It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But under civil law, it is the property itself--not the owner--that is charged with involvement in a crime. What's more, that property is considered "guilty" until proven innocent in court by its owner, thus turning our usual system of justice on its head.
According to a report prepared for the Senate Judiciary Committee, at least 90 percent of the property that the federal government seeks to forfeit is pursued through civil asset forfeiture. And although forfeiture is intended as punishment for illegal activity, over 80% of the people whose property is seized under civil law are never even charged with a crime according to one study of over 500 federal cases by the Pittsburgh Press.
Originally posted by seagull
I'll be going against the flow of the conversation here but...
To take incidents, however bad, and they are, no mistake; such as these and then generalize that all police officers are like this is a mistake. Most, notice I did say most, are people trying to do a job to the best of their ability. I've had encounters with cops in love with their power and who abused it...I haven't let it color my views. I'll still call 'em when I need 'em, and expect them to do their jobs.
Dear Troy _______,
This letter today is to thank YOU for your continued and generous support. It is because of you that we are able to serve THIS community in a positive and charitable way! The Indio Police Officer's Association is asking you to help our community efforts by donating to this worthy outreach program....
Troy_____, as President of the Indio Police Officer's association, it is my duty and obligation to develop community relations...
Originally posted by enjoies05
So what do you want? No police in America?
Would you rather have police make mistakes sometimes, or have murderers, drug lords and criminals running around free with no one after them? I think they do plenty more good than bad.
What do you think? Do they do more good than bad? Help more than make mistakes? I think they help out more. But thats just me, a white person.
Originally posted by chissler
truthseeka,
We disagree on this and I'm not really prepared to beat this same dead horse again. But I do want to ask this one question, and I'll leave it at that.
"If it is inappropriate for me to judge you on the color of your skin, why is it appropriate for you to judge these individuals solely on their profession?"
Originally posted by truthseeka
But, when you have both, they compound into a bigger racism issue.
Originally posted by truthseeka
What's the point? You calling me a --nword-- (just an example) is not NEARLY as bad as cops beating my ass when I've done nothing wrong.
Originally posted by truthseeka
Moreover, I don't know you personally, and will likely never meet you in person.
Originally posted by truthseeka
However, I have and will continue to encounter cops. And, when previous experiences with cops have been bad, why should I NOT be apprehensive about future experiences with cops?
Originally posted by truthseeka
Judging people can be problematic, yes. But, if your judgement might save you from harassment, legal/financial troubles, assault, or death, what's wrong with being judgemental?
Originally posted by truthseeka
I'm not special compared to black males that have been hurt or killed by police; I'm a regular dude. Who's to say I won't end up dead, with my killers getting away scot-free with my murder because of their profession?