John Kerry is Questioned on 911 Theories

Hey Bsbray would you still reconsidered on the Osama Confession tape?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

If not, thats okay.

He acknowledges about the CD because of what information he absorbed provided by the questioner. If you want to used his body language as an excuse, look what he is doing when he says "I think that they....." its almost as if the saying, based on what the information you told me...I would say it I agreed with you too on the demolition."

Seriously all you are doing now is speculation. What happened to words mean things in your previous quote to me. And since obviously words do mean things and you just dont agree with the meaning you are now speculating as to his intent which again is really desperate.

Lets try an experiment.
Take his words literally then tell me what he is saying.

edit to add.
now your trying to change the topic of this thread with bsb.
take that to U2U.


[edit on 23-4-2007 by etshrtslr]

I noticed the questioners asked as if what they were asking was common knowledge. They seemed oblivious to the fact that most people don't have a clue what they are talking about. He was just trying to not look bad or insult others until he could figure out what the meaning of the questions was. To read anything into what he said is very premature to say the least.

People who believe in the 9/11 Conspiracy are very rare. People who even know what it is are rare. I'm sure this was the first time anyone had asked him about this. If I were to ask a thousand people at random if they were aware of this theory; I'd bet only a handful would say yes. I'd be surprised if it were 5%. Out of them most would probably not believe it is true. The numbers of visitors on this board may seem large but considering the potential audience is global?

Originally posted by etshrtslr

Seriously all you are doing now is speculation. What happened to words mean things in your previous quote to me. And since obviously words do mean things and you just dont agree with the meaning you are now speculating as to his intent which again is really desperate.

Isn't that what we do? From this subject to the the Pull it subject to Bush's explosives on planes?

Lets try an experiment.
Take his words literally then tell me what he is saying.

I have and I know that based on my speculation, he pretty much thinks it was a demo PROVIDED what the questioner asked and told him. You know when the questioner told him that PULL is the term for demolition of a building, Kerry nods his head as if he finally understands.



Look and listen, before assuming that what Kerry said is an admission.

Look and listen, before assuming that what Kerry said is an admission.

At least you admit you are speculating.

But given your speculation and his actual words I will chose the later every time.

Originally posted by etshrtslr


At least you admit you are speculating.

But given your speculation and his actual words I will chose the later every time.

Fine by me. I'm certain you agreed with the questioner when he says Larry admitted pulling down the building and PULL means demolishing a building in demolition term.

[edit on 23-4-2007 by deltaboy]

Originally posted by deltaboy

Fine by me. I'm certain you agreed with the questioner when he says Larry admitted pulling down the building and PULL means demolishing a building in demolition term.

[edit on 23-4-2007 by deltaboy]

Again, more speculation by you.

I would like to know who Kerry thought the "they" are that brought down the building in a "controlled fashion".

Originally posted by etshrtslr


Again, more speculation by you.

I would like to know who Kerry thought the "they" are that brought down the building in a "controlled fashion".

Jesus man!!! Listen to the questioner!!!! What is the questioner telling Kerry. How else you think Kerry get that word they???

Originally posted by deltaboy
Hey Bsbray would you still reconsidered on the Osama Confession tape?

Did you even read my last post?

If I have to make a judgment on what something looks like, then you don't have proof. You have something that I have to decide for myself. And I still very much disagree with you. But please learn what the word "proof" means, before I start claiming every other post that I've also proven everything I believe.

Originally posted by deltaboy

Jesus man!!! Listen to the questioner!!!! What is the questioner telling Kerry. How else you think Kerry get that word they???

So the questioner is putting words in Kerry's mouth?

Geez your making it sound like the questioner had some sort of control over what Kerry said. Talk about conspiracy.

Kerry is an educated intelligent person and he knows how to handle tough questions.

Kerry is the only one responsible for the words he speaks...no one else is and he used the word "they" when answering the question.

So I want to know who the "they" are that brought down the building in a "controlled fashion" as Kerry says.

You really need to quit constructing your view of what he said to fit you beliefs.


[edit on 23-4-2007 by etshrtslr]

Originally posted by deltaboy

Originally posted by gottago

Let's face it, John Kerry is a very seasoned politician. He could have easily demurred and deflected the question, saying something to the effect of, "I have heard nothing about that topic and I really can't answer it".

Lets face it? You addressing this as if the truth was finally revealed, this ain't it. He could have, but since we can never tell what he should or could do.

What, John Kerry is not a seasoned politician? You're suggesting he doesn't have a free will, a politician's innate sense of when to duck a dangerous question? Sheesh.

Fact is, he addressed the question directly and responded by saying that he had been told WTC 7 was brought down in "a controlled manner." He put in the asterisks of "I think" etc., but the end result is, he answered the question and said it was a CD, to the best of his knowledge.

No...the question was more of a leading question then just asking him what he thought of the destruction of WTC7.

Maybe we watched two different videos.

And that is nonsense about "the wall" he refers to as being that of one of the towers; he's clearly no idiot and is answering the question, which was specifically about bldg 7.

We could use the same argument about Larry's words "pull" and "it" with building or firefighters, now you pretty much understand the problem.

LS said what he said, on tape. It means what it means, demolish the bldg. Everything jives, his syntax and his meaning in the context of the question, as well as using insider lingo for a CD. I'm sure he rues that slip up very much.

What is fascinating is that he did answer the question, apparently rather truthfully, but with his typical style of adding verbiage. He acknowledges the CD. Very impressive find.

As for the poster who mentioned his body language, it is very defensive, the arms crossed, and watch Teresa too, when she realizes where the question is heading, she turns and looks like she's ready to vomit.

When was this question asked? Is it recent, or from the 2004 campaign?

He acknowledges about the CD because of what information he absorbed provided by the questioner. If you want to used his body language as an excuse, look what he is doing when he says "I think that they....." its almost as if the saying, based on what the information you told me...I would say it I agreed with you too on the demolition."

Again, your premise is unsound to say the least. It is that Kerry was somehow forced by mind control by the questioner to actually answer the question. He was under no obligation, and he could have avoided it easily. Again, he is a smart man and a seasoned politician. They weigh every word, at all times. He took the question on anyway, a very dangerous one, and answered that he had heard it was a CD.

That is quite astonishing, no matter what arguments you throw about to try to muddy the waters.

Are you being purposely dense, or trolling here?

[quote-in-quote nightmare]

[edit on 23-4-2007 by gottago]

I find it hard to believe he has been `briefed` enough to know that a dodgy wall was the reason for the demolition of WTC7, but somehow has NEVER even questioned this considered this in any greater depth, and especiallt that he wasn`t aware of Larry Silverstein`s statement/slip.
Interesting Nonetheless...

Sorry, but im gonna have to jump in here with my two cents worth

While we can interpret HOW and WHAT John Kerry said, This is what i'm thinking.

First off how many people were present in the audience? What about John Kerry's Security Detail? Would they have mildly interrogated guests? would they maybe know who's who, and what might be the questions asked?

and does anyone agree with the fact that he came from upstairs after being briefed by his P.R persons on how to answer those potential questions ? Oh and by the way they also KNEW this was being filmed.

I mean c'mon, he was a Presidential candidate for god's sake, he is pretty knowledgable on how this PR thing works. He is always prepared for public speaking.

No curve ball questions there, he answered the way he prepared to.

just my 2 amero's worth.

Never have I seen conspiracy theorizing or de-bunking being so silly! We're dissecting the words and body language of a politician to see where he stands on an issue he has no stake in taking a stand on! And the one Dem Bonesman to come outta the woodwork to "run against" Bush in '04. He drops more confusing hints, I guess just to see how we respond. "Oh man, if Kerrey came out, plus Rosie, wow we'd totally win then!"
DUH!
No offense intended to any previous posters - just sayin...

www.controlled-demolition.com... reqItemId=20050317195824

Here is a press release from CDI regarding a demolition in Florida and they make two references to the term 'pull'. Specifically the term is a demolition term describing the walls being 'pulled' a desired direction during the demolition sequence.

Originally posted by etshrtslr
Bump

I cant believe this is not the hottest topic on ATS.

I cant believe its not the hottest topic on NATIONAL TV.. no wait, I can,they control all that we see on tv......damn..

I posted this in another thread but I want to say it again.


There was no structural damage to the lower portions of either building. The 'weakened steal from heat' line is bunk because last time I checked heat RISES and would not have affected the integrity of the lower steel structure. Also, a flame retardant is mixed with airline fuel to minimize fire, I watched a special on TV about it a few years back. None of the dummies inside the test plane burned.

There is a central structure in the center of the building that anchors the building to the ground and acts as the building spine...if the floors 'pancaked' down, this central structure in AT LEAST SOME portion would be left standing, as the building was built AROUND it. The Twin Towers were also a money pit that needed an overhaul in both the asbestos that it was filled with (the flame retardant that covers the steel infrastructure) and the out of date communications lines. It was going to cost A LOT to renovate what needed to be fixed.

Larry Silverstein had just taken out a $15 Million ($15,000,000) terrorism insurance policy on Building #7 (which also fell that day, had no damage other than some fire, was behind 2 other building, contained paperwork on some scandals (Enron), and is rumored to house the remotes for the demolition charges in the towers, etc...) which had a payout of $3.5 Billion ($3,500,000,000) but since he claimed 2 planes equals 2 attacks he got paid $7,000,000,000 (this was in court not too long ago by the way).

$15,000,000 to $7,000,000,000 is a huge return on an investment.

It got the gears in motion for a cash cow known as the Iraq War, the war on 'terror', and the Patriot Act for our 'freedom'. The VT shooting should show you that this whole 'War on Terror' thing is a HOAX. Why didn't that town go to CODE RED terror alert level during those 2 hours. Terrorists don't belong to governments, and neither do people that print the money.

The 'New World Order' engineered this whole thing and left loose ends intentionally so that people would do what they are doing right now. A cetain amount of people are piecing it together, getting mad, acting out, and will soon be filling a jail cell (it is easier to defeat an uprising one by one than all at once, and a little tainted prison food every so often to thin the heard, but not so much that it draws speculation). Katrina and New Orleans was a test to see what happens when things in a US town go ape sh!t (not even neighboring citizens went to help, I should know, I live in Alabama). At the end of it the only people left will be good ol' complacent, non-thinking, law abiding (money making) citizens. There's nothing you can do to avoid this social reform and that's why I LOVE AMERICA. Turn in your neighbor before your other neighbor beats you to it, cause then ure next.

[edit on 23-4-2007 by Spoodily]

Great thread peeps.
Let me start by saying I have seen literally hundreds of hours of videos and read untold reports on this and related subjects including the 9/11 commission report and other docs. I am still amazed at peoples surprise, ignorance and reactions when I start posing questions to do with WT7.
In my view, this is a very revealing interview you have posted. Thanx.
I find it absolutely staggering that a man (and his wife) in his position admits to knowing so little on the questioners subject and yet can make such confirming statements, dealing with it swiftly and very agreeably. Notice he moves swiftly on to telling people about the available websites?? not lingering or questioning the questioner.
Seems to me he confirms the controlled demo of WT7 though, whether it was a wall of the building or the whole thing. ANY confirmation of ANY controlled demolition screams inside job. It would be impossible to set charges in that building on that day under such short notice which, if we believe the evidence we have been fed by mainstream media, suffered severe fire and debris damage would be prohibitively too dangerous to enter for a demolition team.So this is something we will hear a lot more about in the very near future.
I also watched Teresa VERY closely. It was as if she was faking her surprise and did some totting up of hours or money that was mentioned. She also focuses on John at some key moments as if to observe his reaction and answer to see how he handled something she too knew the answer to.
Sorry, BUT THE WHOLE THING STINKS in my opinion.
My biggest concern would be: If Bush goes, who takes his place? Same dummy, different mask comes to mind!


My head is buzzing & can't write any more
Will contribute when I can, keep this going, good work.

Kerry was performing. A lot of people are enthralled by a puppet show and take it so so seriously. If 911 Truth starts to make real headway with mainstream sleepwalkers and the rock-a-bye-baby media, then we are going to see a lot of fake quizzical faces among the politicians and feigned looks of surprise (plus hand-wringing by their wives) as something like the real facts of 911 come to be accepted. Just hold your nose and gag it down. It means the log jam is starting to break.

It's going to be disgusting when all the fleas jump off the dead body and climb onto the new body, but mark my words, that is exactly what they will do.

[edit on 23-4-2007 by ipsedixit]

This video proves that John Kerry is part of the "sheeple" community.

First off, John Kerry WAS refering to WTC7. The problem is, just like millions of other people (including me), when John saw that clip of Silverstein saying "pull-it", he actually thought they were going to CD the building because it was damaged and could have fallen SIDEWAYS. Instead of WTC 7 falling sideways and potentialy destroying other buildings and killing more, they decided to control demolish WTC7 so it will fall STRAIGHT where they want it, and save buildings and people.


The above is what I thought happened on 911, and when I researched it, it turns out that it is TRUE. But they CD'd WTC7 for more than the reasons above. Then the US Gov. lies, and tried to cover WTC7's CD now, because they forgot that smart people actually know how long it takes to rig a building with explosives, and from 9:02am to 5:00pm is not long enough.

To put it simply, John Kerry thinks WTC7 was an INTENTIONAL controlled demolition by firefighters, to save people and property. John hasn't yet figured out how long it takes to rig a building. He also doesn't know that the gov. changed its mind and is trying to deny the CD story, because no one would believe they rigged the building on 9-11, meaning they did before 9-11, meaning 9-11 was planned.


Conlcusion--

Don't look to Kerry for answers, he doesn't know anything about 911.



[edit on 24-4-2007 by -ufo-]