Larry King celebrates 50 yrs of journalism/Disinformation

Now I hate to be a pessimist here, but I have heard many rumors that Larry King is in fact involved with occult NWO strategists and a disinformation specialist that enjoys the benefits of the Bohemian Grove among other things. Am I falsely assuming these things on his 50 year anniversary in Journalism?

Larry King has for some time been questioned for being too easy on his guests. I have always personally thought he was ok. However after finding certain information out I began losing my respect for the man.

My favorite story is of Larry King being involved with and laughing at seein a snuff film made at the grove which included men in cloaks, rape, sodomy and murder of a 13 yr old boy.

Paul Bonnnaci mentions Larry King's involvement:

Warning: This Is Very Graphic!!!!!!!!!!!

Paul Bonnaci (who won aa $1million in a court case against a US politicain) tells of rape and murder at the Grove, that is quite a BIG deal

www.tedgunderson.com...

I do think it is very funny however how Mike wallace puts Lary King on the spot in one of the videos below:

60minutes.yahoo.com...

Well anyway 50 yrs is a long time doing anything I guess



[edit on 15-4-2007 by theutahbigfoothunter]

[edit on 15-4-2007 by theutahbigfoothunter]

[edit on 15-4-2007 by theutahbigfoothunter]

I wonder why those Freemasons on this board never say anything about their little Homosexual child sex rings.

Guess the Freemasons on this board are not cool enough to rape and murder children. You have to be a 20degree mason to do that...

Larry King is a man without any opinion when it comes to talking either for or against the government. But if you notice, he has NOTHING to EVER say about anything. He offers NO opinion about anything.

He's just an old man with suspenders getting paid to give people face time on TV and he has no imput one way or another.

He's not incriminating himself- some people chose to do that so that they think they appeal to everyone and make no enemies.

He's just there.

Just a quick aside, guys, but I think the Larry King associated with what they call "The Franklin Cover-up" is a different Larry King. If that's the case, I'm sure the TV version would appreciate the clarification.

I would like to know if it's a different one because it also refers to Hunter S. Thompson, is that a different one too or is this just a mix up. I figured it wouldn't mentioned names unless the people were famous. Please if anybody knows I would like this clarified. Thanks

It's a different Larry king, the one implicated in a number of similar scandals. there's a banned documentary on google video about the whole 'child-sex smuggling ring' thing, that talks a lot about the other (non-suspendered) King, who's more involved in politics.

so, a totally different Larry King. that aside; that story really doesn't sound too believable to me. the way it's phrased, the constant use of 'and stuff'... it all smacks of deception and delusion. it's just my opinion.

Yes it is a different LARRY KING, the other was Lawrence King who went to Jail.

IT IS NOT LARRY KING the interviewer.

I would like to know if it's a different one because it also refers to Hunter S. Thompson, is that a different one too or is this just a mix up.

I hear that too, as mentioned in another recent thread. That's apparently the same Thompson. Quite distressing a suggestion that is.

the larry king that this poster is referring to is in jail. its just confusion do to the similarity of the names but if you type alot of common names like mike white or matt smith into google you get alot of hits on different people but their certainly not all the same person. to suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

That's a bummer. I thought he was a little weird, but that's way over the top. I would like to apologize to everyone about confusing this Larry King with the other one. I honestly thought it was the same one after reading seeing this website and reading about the talk show Larry King: freemasonrywatch.org...
Again, Apologies. And thanks to all who clarified

Thing to remember about Thompson is that there's no evidence on the table. That being the case, the more important question becomes "Why is he being smeared?" Talk is that he was suicided. I don't think even the great man himself could have dreamed this one up.

Seems that if they want people to recoil from undue examination of any issue, then throw pedophilia into the mix. Apparently the same is now being done with Richard Tomlinson (ex-MI6). Curiouser and curiouser...

These days, people are so tense and scared of everything and everyone that if you point the finger at someone and yell 'pedophile!', everyone's gut reaction is to be horrified and nobody feels like they can really contradict you because then you're 'defending a pedophile'. it's a pretty easy way to smear just about anyone you don't like, just by implying it. Nowadays tensions are so high from everyone watching pedo grandpa on Dr Phil and whatnot that you don't even need any evidence to convict someone in the public eye.

I'm not in ANY WAY defending actual pedophiles or sex offenders, just to make that clear. they're scum that should burn in the deepest pits of hell, to be sure. I'm just making a point that in the modern age you can smear just about anyone by falsely accusing them of being a pedophile without actually supplying any evidence, and that could very easily be what's happening here (at least for certain individuals).