The Next, Coming Terror Attack

With all current, obtainable information together, I can say it's damn near safe to say that our United States can be guaranteed to be free from another "terrorist attack" for the next two years. At least, my friends, until the current Bush is out of office. If anything in the past seven years has been shown to us, it is that Bush and family care very much about their reputation. Bush one is not thought of as a particularly good or positively remembered president, and the family would not want two lame-ducks in such a highly coveted position. Bush two, however imcompetent, is smart enough to realize that his current actions will not leave him a positive legacy. If there is anything that should be noted from our increasingly "dangerous world," the danger will grow. In a presidency not marked by any positive results from domestic action, his one final rememberence will be that he kept the country safe. Safe from the "terrorists," which is a job the Democrats cannot do. Believe in the NWO? Pay very close attention to the things happening in the next few months, as I am sure Republicans will paint the same picture as painted in 2004: Deomcrats cannot keep the country safe. When the United States people rally behind change and elect a Democrat, the real flags will fly. A single fabricated attack is enough to usher in change, another will usher in the "new, safer" era. Watch V for Vendetta, as I can imagine things will unravel somewhat similiar. The people will fear the terrorists and will not respect new leaders, they'll support the ones who kept them "safe." Thus, the country will throw open arms to the New World Order, a salvage from the terrorists, even if it means shedding the Constitution and the rights that come along with it.

IMO, we are no safer now than before 9/11. In fact, it may be worse. The fiasco that we have caused in the middle east has more than fueled the hatred felt by radical islamic groups. So we haven't had a attack since 9/11, does that mean that Bush has kept us safer? Couldn't this also have been said after the first trade center bombing, that Clinton kept us safer during the rest of his presidency because there were no more attacks? If there are no more terrorist attacks while Bush is office I seriously doubt it is because he made this country safer to help his legacy.

You are completely misreadingwhat I am saying. I am saying, that as September 11th was a coordinated attack from within our government, that Bush will not have American being attacked again while he is President. As I stated before, one terrorist attack is enough to bring in an era of change. Bush is for this, this set the stage for the NWO. As Bush and the government are responsible for the first attack, I am guaranteeing, while G. W. Bush is President, we will not have another terror attack. He has a bad enough reputation now, another will completely wipe off any credibility he has with the public. As has been stated before on this site, the stage is set for the real plans to begin in 2008. Then, when there is another, presumably Democratic, leader to blame it on, the one's who kept us safe will be welcomed back by the American people when the next attacks occur. Any thought of the United States denying the New World Order is cloudy. I can assure all, that when the New World Order is revealed, it will be welcomed with open arms.

Originally posted by Axe0312
With all current, obtainable information together, I can say it's damn near safe to say that our United States can be guaranteed to be free from another "terrorist attack" for the next two years.

What 'current, obtainable information' are you talking about?
If you have links, please post them. (or is this opinion?)

I disagree. I say -

'it's damn near safe to say that our United States can be guaranteed MORE terrorist attacks - at our interests like military bases and embassys - all around the world and for a very long time.'

I don't think it matters who is in office, they will attack anyways.
Oh sure ... the terrorists may be emboldened more if certain people get
into the oval office. But just because G.W. is in doesn't mean they will
back off.

IMHO

Edited to add -

Originally posted by Axe0312
I am saying, that as September 11th was a coordinated attack from within our government,

Oh .. nevermind about the 'please give links' thing.

[edit on 4/10/2007 by FlyersFan]

Umm what actions by the current president leads you to believe that he CARES what is thought of him and his legacy? I think in history, yes, most presidents would follow this template of improving situations and perceptions before term of office is out. However this prez is indifferent to the will and of the people.

Case in point:

Bush bypasses Senate on naming ambassador in abuse of power

SOURCE

[edit on 10-4-2007 by greatlakes]

If one believes that September 11th was carried out by a group of Islamic Extremists, then you are correct in saying I am wrong, we do not know when, where, or how they will attack again. However, if you do not have unwavering faith in a government that spews out lies upon lies, and believe the theory that perhaps our government orchestrated the attack that fateful day, then I guarantee everyone safety from these "terrorists." It does matter who is in office, all presidents care very much about their legacy, as does the current. He does not want to be remembered as a failure. His place in history and following laws are seperate, we can see that he has tossed the Constitution to the side time and time again. Keeping America safe will be his legacy.

[edit on 10-4-2007 by Axe0312]

Originally posted by Axe0312
With all current, obtainable information together, I can say it's damn near safe to say that our United States can be guaranteed to be free from another "terrorist attack" for the next two years.

I say wait until a potato is dropped on Persia before jumping to that conclusion.

I'm not about to write off the fact that they may have "sleeper cells" around in about every country waiting.

Only if what they say is true, this country could go from hero to zero in a day's time, supposing that they are truly in place and ready for go ahead. Picture the impact of something as minute as a car bomb in every major US city going off simultaneously. Even if it did no damage much. That'd be a perfect martial law excuse right there.

Oh I have no doubt in my mind that we have the capabilities, I believe that in the vain of Bush whatever real event may happen to push martial law on, will be after he is out of office.

Originally posted by Axe0312
You are completely misreading what I am saying.

i dont think he misinterpreted what you said at all.

what he was saying and what ill say to you is people will not believe the republicans have kept us safe. bush has not shown any quality that the people would value. regardless of who planned 9-11, its this administration that keeps us in a war that the people want nothing to do with.

what most people will want is an independent to represent them. unfortunately this wish may not come true.

im sure your guess on what stance the REP will take is accurate, but i dont see it helping them any.

I believe 9/11 was an act of the real in charge government to go ahead Iraq, maybe even order by the aliens.

An order by aliens..?

my guess would be biological weapons blamed on terrorists

My guess is something along those lines sounds very convincing.. biological weapon or perhaps a dirty bomb? Whatever will cause the most panick and disarray will be chosen, as that will grant the need to declare martial law.

Oh, i think there's something headed this way (pardon me, did you say Bush cares about his image?)I wont laugh because I dont want to be disrespectful to you.
Unlike 9/11, what happens will most likely be outside terrorism forces who are going to pay us back. Of course, this is my opinion and mine only, but judging the pattern, i feel pretty safe or unsafe by saying this. It will be payback time at some point, and according to prophesy, which i do read, Father Wingate has visions of Russians and Chinese among other nationalities attacking us from the North,South East and West- it could be BS, but it could be true. Look for a ship, a battle ship of ours to sink and all hell will brake lose.
But that will be a good day for the governments of the world who want to rid the planet of millions.
BTW, i am of the thought that its not just Bush, there are other countries involved in this "lets get rid of them charades"

Just my 2 cents.

Originally posted by dgtempe
Oh, i think there's something headed this way (pardon me, did you say Bush cares about his image?)

I wont laugh because I dont want to be disrespectful to you. - Father Wingate has visions of Russians and Chinese among other nationalities attacking us from the North,South East and West

I too follw Father wingnut, but he told me that it would be Mexicans advancing fomr the north and Canadians from the south...wait...scratch that..now reverse it....Father wingnut PU-LEEZE. I wont laugh because I dont want to be disrespectful to you

Of course President Bush cares about his legacy, even Jimmy Carter cared about his legacy ( not wanting his policies to be blamed for the first go-a-round with iran )

M.Agenda!

Just my .10 worth

If you want to know when something is going to go down become a wall street banker or lawyer, then you can also profit from the attacks.

I think that both parties are actually one-in-the-same. They all act exactly the same when they get power, they abuse it. To say that they differ in views is true, but doesn't everyone disagree with everyone else on at least something? I find it especially nearsighted to assume that either Democratic or Republican control of the Three Branches will bring any kind of noticeable change, as both parties are controlled by a much smaller, more elite unknown third party, IMHO.

TheBorg

Originally posted by TheBorg
I think that both parties are actually one-in-the-same. They all act exactly the same when they get power, they abuse it. To say that they differ in views is true, but doesn't everyone disagree with everyone else on at least something? I find it especially nearsighted to assume that either Democratic or Republican control of the Three Branches will bring any kind of noticeable change, as both parties are controlled by a much smaller, more elite unknown third party, IMHO.

TheBorg

I tend to agree with Borg's overall premise here. I have thought this for many years now about the institution or religion of politics. It is not run by the American people for Americans but for someone unknown or unseen in the background. I suspect this has been going on for some time now but only gotten more sophisticated in how it works. My opinion on this is that it has been going on since some time back in the Ameircan Civil war if not further back.
The telltale sign of this openly coming about is when you go back in books and newspapers and see the word "Democracy " occuring over and over..instead of the word..Republic. "And to the Republic for which it stands." This means that the machine to make this happen was in place quite awhile before the open switch to the word Democracy.
To me this means we have been Hijacked.

Thanks,
Orangetom

^
I think it should be obvious to everyone by now that the only differences among the republicRATS are rhetorical. They talk slightly differently, but walk the exact same globalist walk.

Personally, I think we'll be under martial law before Bush is out of office. I think it's his role to bring down the USA so that the NAU can come in, much like Hitler had to bring down Germany for a united Europe to exist. Just think about the image W presents and the things he has been made to represent. They are all the things the globalists most want to destroy, and after W initiates a nice little nuclear exchange, they will be forever demonized and easily replaced, with the resulting chaos making it quite easy for the new order to be established.

edit for grammer

[edit on 21-4-2007 by resistor]

We just need to drop a few MOABs (wish we could nuke) on top of afghanistan and keep pounding them down. Man if I was in charge, afghanstan would be a giant swimming pool by now. Fly some Peackeeper missiles tipped with MOABs and eliminate every single living soul so that there is no attack of terrorism in the future. Then burn the country with napalm and then throw radioactive waste products on their so that no plants could ever grow and there would be no food for the enemies. Im just getting started. That is phase I of operation remove terrorist. Got to check on dinner. brb