Rosie O'Donnell 911 Conspiracy Comments Popular Mechanics Responds

Rosie O'Donnell 911 Conspiracy Comments Popular Mechanics Responds

www.popularmechanics.com

While saying she didn’t know what to believe about the U.S. government’s involvement in the attacks of Sept. 11, she said, “I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.popularmechanics.com
www.popularmechanics.com

I know a lot of people happen to believe in the 911 conspiracy, but have any of you ever considered reading the popular mechanic article debunking the 911 conspiracy instead of all the bias website out there? In my opinion the official story makes more sense then the 911 conspiracy. But how would you know if you don\\\'t read the popular mechanic article debunking the 911 conspiracy? I added the link here for you to read before you jump to conclusions. Let me know what you guys think. www.popularmechanics.com... \"Read this article here\"

www.popularmechanics.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

The article in question is very good. I am interested in hearing the response to it. Can someone point me to the discussion of WTC 7? And what is the response to this article?

The widely accepted account that hijackers commandeered and crashed the four 9/11 planes is supported by reams of evidence, from cockpit recordings to forensics to the fact that crews and passengers never returned home.

We got reamed alright, but not by terrorists. Sketchy forensics, mysterious black boxes, and inaccurate passenger lists does not usually pass as evidence, unless you're the PROSECUTING attorney.

Where's The Pod?

Where's the relevance?

No fighter jets were scrambled from any of the 28 Air Force bases within close range of the four hijacked flights.

Fact: Normal protocol was NOT followed on 9/11 and our airspace was left unprotected.

On Sept. 11, FOX News broadcast a live phone interview with FOX employee...

Enough said....credibility and FOX employees don't cross paths.

When the Air Force 'scrambles' a fighter plane to intercept, they usually reach the plane in question in minutes."

That's only if protocols are being followed.

The collapse of both World Trade Center towers--and the smaller WTC 7 a few hours later--initially surprised even some experts. But subsequent studies have shown that the WTC's structural integrity was destroyed by intense fire as well as the severe damage inflicted by the planes.

What was left to study? The crimescene was compromised in record time.

Following up on a May 2002 preliminary report by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a major study will be released in spring 2005 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a branch of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

So a branch of the government can be trusted to thoroughly investigate the government? Okay.

Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat.

And what did they base this on, since a total collapse of a steel building due to fire had never occured? Are these the same experts who said the air was safe to breathe?

Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction.

So these Einsteins want us to believe that the lower and much stronger floors of the WTC buildings offered up NO RESISTENCE WHAT-SO-EVER during these collapses?

The rest of this garbage isn't even worth addressing. Popular is a matter of opinion when it comes to mechanics.

Do a favor to yourself...read something about materials science especialy about creep (deformation),than about trusses and how multiple-story buildings are build,and than maybe you'll understand why all those Einsteins are trying to mess with your brain using that terrible thing logic
But it's easier this days to play it all knowing or just deny all ( you know that bright thing up there we call Sun is actualy the table lamp of the big alien creature,and we are living in his experiment - or and yes the earth is flat...)

I've worked with steel for much of my life. I suggest that you take your own advise and do some research. You're riding on a slippery slope to nowhere..... or perhaps you are a shill who ignores the most basic principles of physics in exchange for a dirty paycheck.

Fate comes a-knockin, doors start lockin
Your old time connection change your direction
You aint gonna change it can't rearrange it
Cant stand the pain...
Its all the same to you, my friend.

What the heck is everyone talking about?

No Personal Commentary

Originally posted by ZMax
Do a favor to yourself...read something about materials science especialy about creep (deformation),than about trusses and how multiple-story buildings are build,and than maybe you'll understand why all those Einsteins are trying to mess with your brain using that terrible thing logic

Originally posted by HaveSeen4Myself
I've worked with steel for much of my life. I suggest that you take your own advise and do some research. You're riding on a slippery slope to nowhere..... or perhaps you are a shill who ignores the most basic principles of physics in exchange for a dirty paycheck.

Let's stop derailing threads with personal commentary.

The only shills I am aware of deliberately disrupt discussion of 9/11, and I strongly recommend not emulating their tactics.

I gotta say I glad Rosie got a ball rolling here. A solid but expected response. I'm very interested to see the NIST's report on WTC 7 that was mentioned coming out soon. Especially since they are putting in a section specifically for the CT's.

Originally posted by whoknew
I gotta say I glad Rosie got a ball rolling here. A solid but expected response. I'm very interested to see the NIST's report on WTC 7 that was mentioned coming out soon. Especially since they are putting in a section specifically for the CT's.

They will say:

1. damage from Wtc 1 and 2.
2. RAGING infernos.
3. "pressurized" diesel lines.

I cringed when I heard her say "first time in history that fire has melted steel". Of course we know she meant "first time in history that fire caused a steel building to collapse" since steel has been melted by fire since it was created as an alloy of iron.

We need to be bulletproof in what we say here. We don't need to give the official story guys any bullets to fire, however mundane and obvious they are to explain.

3. "pressurized" diesel lines.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here. I thought that most of the fuel those tanks could hold was recovered. I can't find the thread I read that in. Can anyone clear this up?

TWO TOP WEBSITES WHERE YOU SHOULD GET YOU FACTS SRAIGHT

WWW.911MYTHS.COM

WWW.DEBUNKING911.COM