NASA computer's hacked?

your thoughts please?. very interesting stuff


www.youtube.com...
width="425" height="350"> "http://www.youtube.com/v/B4PkNPCEnJM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350">

www.youtube.com...
width="425" height="350"> "http://www.youtube.com/v/j5uzvrmbIx8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350">

While I applaud hackers trying to find truth's.

It strikes me from very early on he doesn't seem to be planning on showing any hard evidence for anything he claimed to have found.

personally I won't take the risks trying to hack these systems myself. But if I could and would, I would have downloaded any condemning hard evidence I could find and you'd find it splattered big time on e.g. ATS, sent to newspapers and magazine around the globe and so on.

So where's the proof.

admittedly the video hasn't finished yet so maybe he will.. I just don't suspect he will.

[edit]okay okay a 350 mb photo with dial up would be painful
BUT if he had access to the system using remote pc software he could have created a smaller compressed jpg version and download that.[/edit]

[edit on 1-4-2007 by David2012]

far more interesting imho, it was on the selection window viewing your video
Buzz Aldrin talks about UFO's

[edit on 1-4-2007 by David2012]

What do i think about it? that's quite simple:

I think it's laughable to consider that sensitives informations are stocked in such computers with "windows XP" lol

As someone's suggested it's just a scam for hackers to let them think they found something interesting but this might be well organized from a to z ...please believe it.

Never forget US is n°1 in disinformation and this rule applies in every domain from tv news to nasa's sensitive documents.



Oh and is it me or this dude looks like Spok ?

He saw raw pictures of these ufo's but he didn't take pictures because he was shocked at what he saw. Yeah right that would be the first thing you would do. So I find it fairly bs that he saw anything.

From what I can tell, this guy was nothing more than a script kiddie who got caught (as they usually do). And now is being made an example of to others by the US Gov't. I doubt he saw anything secretive since sensitive information would be kept on a separate network not accessible through the Internet. And really, all he would have had to do to get the image was to push the 'print screen' button on his keyboard.

I do how ever think the charges put on him by the US are a bit over the top though.

That's interesting, i heard the same thing on a podcast whilst browsing the web! What are some safety and hacking concerns for windows vista? does the remote access switch work the same? please tell me.
thanks.

[edit on 2/4/2007 by Risingson]

I'm sceptical that the NASA, or any organisation that sucessfully have any "proof" of UFOs, would keep them on a system connected to the internet. These things are simply too sensitive, even if they were "unhackable".

But who knows, they're just pictures after all, it might very well be a disinformation thing.

What amazes me is that this master hacker hacked NASA apparently with the goal of catching any UFO information, yet, he seemed completely unprepared to the size of the pictures, and all that. I don't know...

I say make him do life in prison in order to deter other assclowns like him. But Guantanamo Bay? Hell, that's pretty harsh.

McKinnon actually comes across as a rather sincere person. Granted, what he did was rather foolhardy but still he did something which certainly ruffled some feathers stateside as the potential punishment and the swiftness in which the extradition order was granted does not scale with the crime.

Though, it's more than likely he is just being made an example of.

Or, he "disappears" and is reqruited by MJ-12 instead .