It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nerdling
They normally hide things when they're upto something because most of the time the transmissions are as bold as can be.
Originally posted by Kano
Originally posted by Nerdling
They normally hide things when they're upto something because most of the time the transmissions are as bold as can be.
Isn't that just ignoring evidence that doesn't fit your theory? There were earthquakes for a long time before HAARP came around.
Originally posted by shoo
Maybe one of those?
earthquake.usgs.gov...
earthquake.usgs.gov...
and btw. small earthquake happen all the time. About 2000 a day, just read that somewhere yesterday. So as long as there are no news around it is false alarm. Or
Well, actually, it appears that if there are "2000 quakes a day" under St. Helens, they must be < .5 mag, because as you can see in Nerdling's post above, .5 and up is recorded.
The first event may very well have been the 4.2 off the Oregon coast, but as I said before I spent an hour checking CA events against recordings on St. Helens' webicorder and they don't show up...so the second was is not the 3.5 (the times don't match either) - the second event in the Cascades was at about 15:45 UTC. The 3.5 was at 16:00 UTC.
As for conspiracy, I don't know what you're talking about. This thread is about concerning webicorder tracks on St. Helens...how can that be a conspiracy???
Originally posted by Valhall
The 3.5 was at 16:00 UTC.tracks on St. Helens...how can that be a conspiracy???