It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The political neutrality of Jehovah's Witnesses is also expressed by their refusal to participate in military service, even when such is of a compulsory nature, and by their detachment from secular politics. Before 1996, Jehovah's Witnesses also refused alternatives to military service.[105][106][107] Jehovah's Witnesses are discouraged, but not prohibited under all circumstances, from voting in elections.[108] They believe voting or elections in themselves are harmless, for example, although they would not generally vote to elect a political leader, they would have no problem voting on a trivial issue such as what color balloons to buy for a party.[109] They do not stand for any political office.[110]
en.wikipedia.org...'s_Witnesses
Originally posted by wellwhatnow
As a former JW, I can understand where they are coming from. Although their faith does allow them to abide by secular laws, they feel that God's "laws" should take precedence. If the two should be in conflict, God's way should be the one that is followed.
A major part of their faith concerns non-participation in political arenas. (To live in this world without being of this world.) In the US many of them were imprisoned for dodging the draft during the Vietnam war. If facing years of imprisonment would not cause them to bend, then I think a fine isn't going to do it either.
Requiring these people to vote would be like requiring a Christian to spit on a Nativity scene. It just isn't likely to happen.
To avoid the vote is an act of worship.
Although I am not knowledgable about law in Australlia, I know that in the US it would be a complete violation of the freedom of religion to require a JW to either vote or pay a fine.