One point I'd like to make is that mainly, UFO's are an ambiguous subject since (I'd say about...) 1920's or '30's. This is quite simple to
understand...
UFO's observations have been made all through recorded history, and possibly even before. Try for example on search engines to find "Julius
Obsequens", a roman writer who in his time was reporting (often as 3rd party) stories of blazing shields in the sky, fireballs, and so on. Stupid
would you say? No, no... How the hell would he describe a commonly recognized today's UFO in his time's words? How could he possibly compare it to a
plane?
(EDIT)
Buffon wrote in his "Dictionnaire des synonymes"
Comme nous ne connaissons rien que par comparaison, d�s que tout rapport nous manque et
qu�aucune analogie ne se pr�sente, toute lumi�re fuit, in English about this:
As we know everything only by comparison, as soon as we have no
relation and no analogy is found, all light goes. So true...
And indeed, all through history one can easily find such reports, with variations in the way people perceived what they saw: it went from blazing
shields to ballons, air "boats" and flying chariots, so on... Old Japan also has its lot of stories, and the Sanskrit history is full of flying
machines, to quote only a few. But then, zzzzzzip through time to about 1910, 1915, and people
knew what to compare it to: planes! They
knew that planes could fly, but they were all about the same shape, not like what they saw, they flew slow and were doing a lot of noise,
unlike also what they could see...
It was obviously something else, it already started to get in the interest of scientists and governments, as well as militaries. Since no plane was
able to that, they were somewhat baffled, but also strongly interested in the phenomenon, and to this date remain. Thus, people who would see it
should not know.
It all started about then that people who would see UFO's were crazy or invented their story. Still today, lots of people think that the ones who see
flying saucers are nuts. The fact that people who do see UFO's are nuts is a new thing in history. About 1 century old thing...
And then there was a supposedly crash (don't remember) in 1942, there was Kenneth Arnold, and above all, Socorro and Roswell in 1947. This one has
been the most documented UFO story so far I think.
The main reason for hiding it is very obvious to understand then: owning better technology than the ennemy. Military powers and wars have so far been
the most excellent accelerator of development ever. Even in old times. They
had to know, and the ennemy should not. It is true when viewed from
all sides: Russian in their USSR times did not publicly talk either about UFO's, though we know now that they knew their bit also.
Maybe, just maybe, another reason... I am not too much eating any of the big conspirationist stories (though one never knows...), but if indeed those
aliens are malicious and if indeed the governments knows, then they certainly do
not want us to know...
Now about the religions (and I must point that I am completely atheist myself), I don't think that they would be that much in trouble. The people who
would be in trouble would be the close-minded ones, any religion. We should accept now anyway that life does exist outside in the universe.
Hey, just two (stupid?) questions anyway...
Would a racist be racist or xenophobic towards aliens? Would
they be racist towards us?
[Edited on 10-4-2004 by SpookyVince]