It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I can see now why you avoid the pentagon argument threads.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Stockholm syndrome
Originally posted by carpooler
I posted several threads on Nosty, but these guys don't seem to be too well read. Hang on for one rough ride. Iran has always been the main event.
Bushies have messed things up so badly, I believe the madmen in Iran are now in the driver's seat. So with the Persians, look to them nuking one of their own cities, and then raising up a monstrous tidal wave of emotion, throughout the Islamic world. Everyone addicted to Persian Gulf oil, is going to be in this coming fight.
Originally posted by billybob
satanists have been planning this for centuries.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
I would dare say that it goes back even further than that. (More like Milleniums)
Originally posted by interestedalways
... we are reactive and not proactive because so many are oblivious, as planned
Originally posted by Vinadetta
... now the media will sell the war and bring about the NWO with little to no reistance of the public.
Originally posted by Inannamute
What can you prove?
According to Stephen Hawking in A Brief History of Time, "a theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations". He goes on to state, "any physical theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis; you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result will not contradict the theory. On the other hand, you can disprove a theory by finding even a single repeatable observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory".
Originally posted by Inannamute
As someone with scientific training, this quote is probably quite apt (from wikipedia.org)
According to Stephen Hawking in A Brief History of Time, "a theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations". He goes on to state, "any physical theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis; you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result will not contradict the theory. On the other hand, you can disprove a theory by finding even a single repeatable observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory".
Every time someone posts a theory about the world, 9/11 etc, ANY specific part of their theory that is either contradictory or disprovable in essence disproves the whole theory.
Originally posted by infinityoreilly
... we still try to make sense of 911 in our own ways, different in sides taken, but both want to win the game. I want to believe it's the way we were told, but my guts say no freaken way! ...
My gut says biggest heist in the history of the world and continuing at this very instant. My heart wants to believe something else!