It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Confirmed: Your Daughter Is Merck's Guinea Pig

page: 1
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:43 AM
link   

CONFIRMED: YOUR DAUGHTER IS MERCK'S GUINEA PIG


www.newswithviews.com

My February 8, 2007 column resulted in quite a few radio show invitations. During my appearance on Michael Baisden's show, several doctors called in to say the HPV vaccine was safe, it has been tested, and yes, they would get their daughters shot up. One mother who phoned into the show said her daughter has received the first of the three shot series and is now worried and doesn't know what to do. I could give her no advice because I'm not a physician, but she should be worried. On March 15, 2007, the bomb dropped on a cable network show which quickly made the Internet media; see full important column here. Diane M. Harper, a researcher who worked on this vaccine has revealed that it has NOT been tested on young girls and "worst case" scenario: increased cervical cancer rates. As I covered in my February 8th column, Merck needs cash badly. The lawsuits over another "safe" product of theirs, VIOXX, could bankrupt them and they know it; one verdict here. At between $320 - $400 per shot per girl in the U.S., then the world, you can see why Merck has spent millions buying the favors of members of the state legislatures. Now comes the truth from an individual who actually worked on this HPV vaccine and pray to God, enough parents get the truth in time. Stockholders of Merck need to bring down the boom on their CEO and others in that company for such irresponsible corporate shennanigans.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.ctv.ca
www.kaisernetwork.org

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Texas Requires Anti-Cancer Vaccine for Girls/Conflict of Interests?
Virginia to require cancer vaccine for girls
Is the Anti Cancer Vaccine a Possible Sterilization Weapon?

[edit on 2007/3/16 by JacKatMtn]
[title: caps]

[edit on 16-3-2007 by 12m8keall2c]



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:43 AM
link   
I was shocked when Texas and my state, Virginia passed legislation mandating the vaccine for HPV, which I honestly had little knowledge of prior.


A brief explanation of HPV

WHAT IS H-P-V? The human papillomavirus, which includes common warts, exists in more than 100 forms, about 30 of which can be sexually transmitted. The virus is ancient and incredibly common. Most people who have genital H-P-V show no symptoms and clear the virus on their own, though some strains can cause persistent genital warts and cancer.





www.newswithviews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:08 AM
link   
Have you noticed the 'fine print'... you know when the announcer whispers the disclaimers...



May... May...

It's an ABSOLUTE embarassment... The drug company labs have NOTHING to do with medicine... The medical field has grown to have NOTHING to do with Science.

It's ALL about the money.

The is NO LIMIT to the publics gullibility in trusting the Big Pharma/MDs.

They have pretty much proven there is basically nothing they won't do in generating cash flow...

We can pretty much add this 'innoculation' for the 'prevention' of CC to the list of other absolute fabrications to diseases, treatments, and medicines foisted on the public...

With the unending daily river of corpses to prove it...

On a somewhat humorous note... Have you guys seen Jarvik pushing his 'anti-cholesterol' drug...

Look at his hair. His liver is seriously hammered.




posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by golemina

The is NO LIMIT to the publics gullibility in trusting the Big Pharma/MDs.


You know who's fault that is, right?

Its the wonderful FDA.
I just heard on the radio yesterday how the FDA is going require new labels on certain sleep aids.

A drug could cause your testicles to drop off and blindness but as long as consumers hear that wonderful "FDA approved" statement they think everything is honky dory. Just slap a new label on it, allow a lawsuit for show but nothing changes. The company that kills people doesnt loose any money or customers.

Dont blame big pharma. Blame the FDA. If they let the pharm companies suffer the consequences of an open market theyd all be shut down if one death made the news. The FDA allows for 100's, even 1000's of deaths before they (gasp!) change the label.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:22 AM
link   
I don't like this "pill / drug culture" for one reason.

No long term testing.

Before you go "but but but you're wrong" - no I am not.

LONG term testing is not "three years".

Long term testing like like, 10, 20, 30 years to see the effects over time.

We are ALL the guinea pigs.

The human body has evolved over thousands of years and isn't use to all the utter crap we eat - much less the 1/2 brained crap Corp Amerika Inc passes off as your new and improved own personal Jesus (tm).

Want to get rid of some weight ? Fight cancer ? Fight some disease ? Fight depression ?

GET OFF YOUR LAZY ASS AND WORKOUT.

Every study on working out says it improves EVERYTHING about you life including fighting depression, cancer, diabetes.

Working out boost your immune system.

THINK ABOUT IT.

But no - fat lazy stupid Americans don't have "time" to workout or are to "tired".

They don't realize they're tired because they DONT workout.

I use to think I had some kind of illness because I was ALWAYS tired even though I never did anything.

Now I workout and have 1000x more energy.

I can go for a 15 mile bike ride and 1hr after I'm done I have 10x more energy than before I started because working out kick starts your metabolism.


edit : Sorry for the hostility I just can stand that people would rather ram handfuls of pills down their pie hole than go on a 1 mile walk.

[edit on 16-3-2007 by NoobieDoobieDo]




[edit on 16-3-2007 by NoobieDoobieDo]



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:26 AM
link   
The long term testing is being done on almost the entire young female population of our country.

When something is found wrong (and I betchya it will be), our ENTIRE female population of childbearing years will be affected.

This is so freak'n stupid. And from a military defensive standpoint it is ... OMG
!!!



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:40 AM
link   
We can't rely on the FDA to protect us......the former director was taking perks from food and drug companies, and resigned under investigation......before that he was overseeing VETRINARY medicines.......( probably felt it was just as well to put us to 'sleep' when we got to be a burden!)

Now he's gone to work for a lobbying firm......so who's ear will he be whispering in ?

Another horror waiting to be 'discovered', I believe is that the big Medicare Drug bill has encouraged nursing home doctors to 'load up' their patients with any and ALL drugs they can find any slight excuse to give them.....whether they are needed or not, whether they cause harm to the elderly or not. And they DO NOT tell family before, or even after they do it!! I suspect they (Dr.s) get some kind of 'kickback' for prescribing as many pills as they can....to those who are least able to protest or testify!



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 01:31 PM
link   
I KNEW it! Last year or so, when I first started hearing the commercials about cervical cancer being caused by a virus, I thought to myself, "They're going to come up with a drug to treat this, because this is the pumping up of classic fear-mongering."

Sure enough, I started to see ads for a drug that could prevent it. Then the schools starting to make the shot mandatory???!?!?!

Man! I'm glad I don't have kids...



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 03:42 PM
link   
A mandatory Shot haha if I had kids over my dead body would they inject
some drug on my kids, I know better that drugs are no good I know medicines and plants that can almost resusitate you.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 07:48 PM
link   
The shot is already in KY. I refused to let them inject it in my daughter.

We only have their word that a virus causes cancer don't we? Where is the proof of this? And if it's been known for years, why wait until a year before a profit making 'mandatory' vaccination is introduced to inform the public?



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:13 PM
link   
Proof?

Google Scholar enough proof?

I come up with 16,700 hits when I use the search term: "cervical cancer" +HPV



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Well we all know that no school age children can be in public or private school without their shots.

And society has accepted and comply with this.

Now this vaccine will be forced into our children and once again people eventually will accept it and be compliant with it, even when is enough evidence of this vaccines killing and causing damage to our children.

This are the things that sometimes I don't get, how we have become a society that while we make so much fuss about issues forced into us by our own government we eventually comply with it.

Funny.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:35 PM
link   
I read somewhere that they are planning on giving this to boys as well since they are generally the conduit for passing it along to women.

My wife and I have already started discussing this thing as she was one of the 25 million or so women who were diagnosed with this virus and she has the rarer kind, which more often leads to cervical cancer. she's all for it but I have said what y'all have been saying. Let's wait and see, our daughter is 4, there's plenty of time for them to find out how good or bad this vaccine is.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:44 PM
link   
Well my daughter that is 23 with a double biology major said that she will not get it, she doesn't trust it.

And my son is already 20 so I have nothing to worry.

By the time my children's children be around we probably have it as mandatory along with the series of school shots, or some children that started as Guinea pig will show some negative results out of it.

Time will tell.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
The long term testing is being done on almost the entire young female population of our country.

When something is found wrong (and I betchya it will be), our ENTIRE female population of childbearing years will be affected.

This is so freak'n stupid. And from a military defensive standpoint it is ... OMG
!!!



You know, the more I think about this, the more creeped out I get.....talk about your One World Order schemes.....this could be a way to shrink the population in just a few years. Is this vaccine being pushed in other countries??



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by marg6043
Well my daughter that is 23 with a double biology major said that she will not get it, she doesn't trust it.


well, according to the studies on the virus (assuming they are accurate), if your daughter is sexually active, odds are about 1 in 5 that she already has the virus.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Crakeur
well, according to the studies on the virus (assuming they are accurate), if your daughter is sexually active, odds are about 1 in 5 that she already has the virus.


And that is something that I will not trust either, I have the feeling that the reason this studies and statistics are flying around is to coerce the population into giving in on the vaccination.

I get paps every year, my mother, my grandmother, my sister, my sister in-laws.

We have never been diagnosed with it.

I only met another women in my life time that was diagnosed with the more serious variation of it, she actually had cancel cells already developed.

I still think that propaganda is been used here.

My point of view on this is, that if you feel comfortable with it by all means go for it.

But people should have the choice, no the government.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:06 PM
link   
my wife found out she had it a few weeks ago and she freaked. then she found out that one of my sisters has it and just about everyone she knows at work and almost all of her friends have it. seems to me it is way too common for them to fully understand this thing



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:13 PM
link   
Crakeur that is very weird and I would go for second opinion, I usually like to do that with anything that has to do with health.

Sometimes paps will come with a positive reading, due to many factors, I imagine your wife is aware of that.

That is why a first reading is followed by certain treatments to rule out reasons of infections.

Then after a treatment the test is done again, up to three times if all the results are positive then is no doubt about the outcome.

In many occasions is easily treated unless is a more advance type of it.



posted on Mar, 16 2007 @ 10:15 PM
link   
she has the virus which may lead to further issues but odds are it won't. I doubt if she's going to get a second treatment as there is nothing to do if she does have it.




top topics



 
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join