posted on Mar, 15 2007 @ 05:01 PM
While I do feel there are many inconsistencies surrounding the Whole of 9-11, I certainly can't see where this video provides an answer to
anything.
From the video ...
Jack Kelley, Foreign/War Correspondent:
"Uhm, apparently
what appears to happen was at the same time two planes hit the building that they're ...
that the FBI ... most likely
thinks that there was a car or trucked, packed with explosives, underneath the building, which also exploded at the same time and brought both of
them down.
... that is the working
theory at this point ... that is still unconfirmed, but that is what the FBI is going on at this point."
At what point does he EVER clarify having been "Informed by the FBI"? The vast majority of his comments seem more
speculative journalism than
anything else.
... and, I think you'll find Jack Kelley is quite capable of ... uhm ...
not getting his story straight.
www.pbs.org...
Read the full article, but here are two choice portions.
"The reason for ending Kelley's employment was that he engaged in an elaborate deception during an investigation into his work," USA Today
editor Jurgensen said on Jan. 13. "He admitted that he engaged in conduct designed to deceive the investigation."
and there's more ...
The lead article explained that reporters had "found strong evidence that Kelley fabricated substantial portions of at least eight major
stories, lifted nearly two dozen quotes or other material from competing publications, lied in speeches he gave for the newspaper and conspired to
mislead those investigating his work."
Oddly enough, it actually raised a few questions.
Who's Jack Kelley (?)
Foreign (War) Correspondent (?)
reporting,
what appears to be,
that the FBI ... most likely thinks (?)
Well, at least I did find answers to those questions.
Way to go Jack ... from Pulitzer to putz.