It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This also totally debunks any holographic theories.
Originally posted by Smack
Anyone with a modicum of discernment can see that 9/11 was an inside job.
What difference does it really make how it was done? It was done.
Originally posted by piacenza
that is exactly my point Who cares what hit them.
THE EVIDENCE ARE JUST AGAINST THE OFFICIAL STORY YOU GUYS NEED TO SHOW physical PROOFS TO SUSTAIN YOUR RIDICULOUS THEORY OF FIRE MELTING STEEL AND LEADING TO A 3 PERFECT COLLAPSE.
WHO ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING?
Originally posted by Kingalbrect79
I don't listen to all these people trying to counter claim what the other guy says
and see that two buildings came down at freefall speed
two of which are the only two in history to do so due to the cause.
Two buildings came down in a perfect demolition pattern, without collapsing all those around them, and building 7 came down, not being hit by a plane at all.
What I was attempting to give with this video is true, unedited footage that shows where many of the misquoted comments on many 9/11 conspiracy sites comes from. No one knew what was going on in the minutes after the first plane attacked, and that is where most of the comments come from. People stating that they heard explosions. No S%$, a passenger jet hit a building.
The day I see true physical evidence is the day I change my mind.
Originally posted by esdad71Intelligence failures and complacency allowed 9/11 to happen.
Originally posted by Smack
Whiterabbit -- If you are going to persist in stalking me from thread to thread
attacking my posts for no other reason than to provoke me
into another inane and pointless debate about the unknowable details of how 9/11 was perpetrated
- I'm just going to ignore you.
I don't owe you anything, Whiterabbit. I don't owe anyone here an explanation or detailed rebuttal of the patently ridiculous.
If I were inclined to try to convince someone of these facts, I would not choose a person like you. It would be an utterly futile exercise and a waste of my time.
Originally posted by esdad71
1. why wait so long to 'pull' the building?
2. Where is the physical evidence?
2 simple questions, and only one person that I know of has attmepted to answer it in a civil manner.