It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
You still havent answered my question yet. what about the rest of the globe? there are 6 billion people on this planet, and im damn sure many of them are willing and able to take up arms against this ellusive NWO and its non-existant army.
As for the facility in the video, its odd, real odd, i can tell you that much. If the info on the side of the vid is accurate (which frankly i doubt) and that facility alone can process 26k people a day, wouldnt the international community be wondering where the hell all of the US citizens are? How come no one can find them and the likes. Who would run American businesses? granted industry is moving to cheaper places, but there is still a huge labour market in the US, who would do all the work?
The NWO plan just has way to many holes to work. It relys heavily on a population that cant think for itself. Frankly despite what hollywood says, Id say a large portion of the population of the US (and an even larger portion of the worlds population) arent mindless robots.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
As for the facility in the video, its odd, real odd, i can tell you that much. If the info on the side of the vid is accurate (which frankly i doubt) and that facility alone can process 26k people a day, wouldnt the international .
Originally posted by PHARAOH1133
Camps (More than 600 in U.S.) then with gas tanks to gas us with then and ovens to burn us into ashes here's a FEMA video.
Watch and listen closely now.
Video Link : video.google.com...
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
A very interesting question, one id like to hear an answer too.
And you still havent answered my question abou tthe international community PHARAOH1133.
Originally posted by annestacey
The international community will fall in line because they will be brainwashed and medicated.
Why do you think there is fluoride in the water?
Why do you think there are so many more people on medication today than ever before?
Why are there so many children being put on Ritalin for a fictitious disease?
Why is it that the standard groceries we purchase are loaded with dangerous chemicals?
Why do you think we see so many advertisements for prescription drugs on TV targeted directly to the consumer?
Why is it that we have more people addicted to prescription pills than the standard illegal drugs of the past?
For a small amount of global elite to do this using Robotic jets, and "Terminator Robots" (like they got in theT2 movie with Arnold Swartzi'n-word') they have them now, using them to unload carrier jets and all kinds different types of operations, they also have Bioweapons, which could wipe out 90 to 95% of the population in a matter of months,
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
If the info on the side of the vid is accurate (which frankly i doubt) and that facility alone can process 26k people a day, wouldnt the international community be wondering where the hell all of the US citizens are?
Take a look at most of the people around you. They want to be controlled.
When there around there buddies there all tough talk but when the boss man comes around they just bow there head and and fall in line with the rest of the heard.
We reward the back stabbers and punish people who stand for there kids, there wife , and them selves.
Just look at the world around you. You see it everyday. Greed, vanity, self-centeredness good. Dignity, politeness, true ( and I cannot stress the word true enough ) indviduality bad.
so, they are gearing up for it now, what are we going to do about it, wait around until we are just bleeding out from some high-tech, Bio weapon, and just let them bury us?
And wondering where the hell all the US citizens are?
Why do you think there are so many more people on medication today than ever before?
Why is it that the standard groceries we purchase are loaded with dangerous chemicals?
Originally posted by PHARAOH1133
But if you're saying why can't we see people in them now....
And wondering where the hell all the US citizens are? that are suppost to be in them then my answer is:
They have not been used yet, in other words they are just preparing them in advance, so when they are ready they will have them all greased up and tuned up humming nicely for the extermination. Who knows for sure though maybe they are using them now and taking the remains (Ashes from bodies and desposing of them? it is possible, who knows for sure?
Let me ask you a couple questions :
1) Did you see the AGA gas cylinders which were quite large and standing vertically next to the building? These are gas cylinders for asphyxiation! AGA Gas, Inc. supplies Asphyxion gases, they sell them. You know like the gas they used on the jews in hitlers death camps. What do you think they are for?
2) Did you notice that they also have new "Natural Gas" also, pipe lines for the ovens they got in those buildings it is seperate and different from the AGA cylinders, in other words different uses. AGA cylinders tanks filled with asphyxiation gas to kill you, then the nateral gas new pipe lines hooked up the the ovens to creamate you.
Please answer my questions, I'm dying to hear your answers!
That's not the end of the toxicity in the world of dentistry, we also have dentists pushing for, get this, the dripping of a highly toxic chemical waste product into the water supply... a substance that's scraped off the smokestacks of industrial polluters. They want every person in the community to actually drink this substance.
This material is a toxic waste that's regulated by the EPA. It would be illegal to drip it into a river or a stream, but for some reason, it is perfectly legal to drip it into the public water supply and let people drink it. It's a bizarre cycle of rationalization that can only be called medical lunacy. They no longer consider this toxic substance toxic if it passes through the bodies of human beings first. What substance am I talking about? Fluorosilicic acid, otherwise known by its short name, fluoride.
"Fluoride is a class 2 poison, it is extremely biochemically reactive in the body and only marginally less poisonous than arsenic. It also makes bones more brittle and has led to a marked increase in dental fluorosis (fluoride poisoning), affecting up to 48% of people in fluoridated areas.
"Those who deny that there are fluoride dangers either are ignoring the huge volume of research, or trying to dismiss it. However even the basic laws of chemistry tell us that fluorides will be highly reactive and damaging in our bodies. Either the pro-fluoridation people must accept the logic of chemistry's laws, or they must re-write the chemistry books.
"Besides the reality of negative health effects, there is also the issue of medical ethics. Fluoridating water is essentially medicating people without their permission. It also violates a number of bills and legislation designed to protect health and human rights, and may be illegal.
But he goes on to make the startling claim that these new psychiatric drugs have directly contributed to an alarming new epidemic of drug-induced mental illness. The very drugs prescribed by physicians to stabilize mental disorders in fact are inducing pathological changes in brain chemistry and triggering suicide, manic and psychotic episodes, convulsions, violence, diabetes, pancreatic failure, metabolic diseases, and premature death.
It may be news to you and me, but it's not news to antidepressant drug manufacturers: they've known about the increased suicide risk for years, but they chose to suppress that information and hide it from public view. It's no secret why: if the truth got out about how dangerous the drug side effects are from antidepressant drugs, the public might call for their removal by the FDA, and that would hurt pharmaceutical profits. So instead of risking a drop in revenues, they just bury the research data and pretend that antidepressants are perfectly safe.
Mike: This was a "disease" that almost appeared to be spreading like a virus.
Dr. Baughman: It was a notion of a disease, an illusory disease; with child psychiatry repeating the lie often enough that it was becoming a reality, especially for the educational establishment and teachers nationwide, and increasingly, the media or the public at large. Then in 1997 with the epidemic standing somewhere around 500 to 700,000 nationwide, they simply rewrote the diagnostic criteria by adding hyperactivity to the attention deficit.
Mike: Do you mean to say that there is a group of psychiatrists who meet in a room somewhere and they just write down and invent whatever behavioral observations they want to assign to this disease definition?
Dr. Baughman: That is exactly the way it works. In medicine, including my specialty, neurology, if a curious observant physician discovers a new abnormality in a patient in his practice or in his clinic at medical schools, that previously unobserved abnormality is the new disease. So there has to be an objective abnormality. In diabetes, there is elevated blood sugar in the blood throughout all the tissues. With cancer, a pathologist has to see cells that have abnormal nuclei and chromosomes under the microscope in order to contend that that patient has that disease or a disease. But in psychiatry, the committee of the diagnostic and statistical manual meets in a room and by a show of hands, they consider one another's favorite galaxies or mixture of behaviors and vote those into existence and give it a code number or an entry into the DSM, and they are all psychiatric disorders. By the word "disorder," they mean disease.
Mike: Have you been pressured to censor your views in any way or have you taken any heat?
Dr. Baughman: Back in 1994-95, I made a formal written proposal to the American Academy of Neurology to write practice parameter for ADHD that would essentially determine the best advisable practices for the disease. The Academy wrote an encouraging response and gave me the go ahead in writing. I presented them with a statement saying that my review of the world scientific literature found no evidence that ADHD was a disease. The next thing that happened was that I heard from members of the Quality Assurance Committee that my efforts wouldn't really be needed any longer. So I was essentially deep-sixed; I was put on the shelf.
The toxic additives and ingredients found in our foods are directly causing chronic diseases like cancer, diabetes and heart disease. Which ingredients am I talking about? Sodium nitrite (cancer), refined white flour (diabetes), hydrogenated oils (heart disease), aspartame (nervous system disorders), red meat (colon cancer), excess sodium (hypertension), and the list goes on.
The food lobby, the big sugar lobby and the soft drink lobby have all blockaded what would have otherwise been good nutritional advice. These food and beverage companies are preventing the government from providing information to the public that would save countless lives and dramatically improve the quality of life while reducing healthcare costs in the decades ahead. This action by the food lobby, in my opinion, is nothing less than the outright suppression of advice that would prevent chronic disease and save countless American lives.
The food lobby can no longer claim that it is just on the sidelines and that these diseases are happening unintentionally, because now it is actively involved in suppressing the very information that would help prevent those diseases. It is at this point that the food industry and beverage industry, combined with USDA officials, becomes a "food racket." It is a racket because it represents a combined effort to protect the profits of the industry at the expense of public health. It's much the same as the drug racket currently operated by the FDA in conjunction with pharmaceutical companies -- and in fact the goals of the two rackets are much the same: boost corporate profits, regardless of the ultimate cost to society.
Now here's what's really interesting about all of this. The more successful the food lobby is at suppressing information that would prevent chronic disease in the American people, the more the pharmaceutical industry benefits financially. Why is that? Because as more Americans eat added sugars, processed foods, hydrogenated oils and other foods and food ingredients that promote chronic disease, the more prescription drugs they will need to treat those diseases. Thus, in a rather bizarre and sickening way, the pharmaceutical industry has the food industry to thank for creating more customers!
Likewise, the people making decisions at the FDA have USDA officials to thank for protecting the profit base that keeps drug companies in business and keeps many FDA officials in positions of power. It's a fascinating economic cycle, and strangely all of this counts towards the Gross Domestic Product. Every dollar spent on junk foods and prescription drugs to treat the diseases promoted by those foods is counted as "productivity" in terms of economics. Yet there's nothing productive about this at all! Technically, productivity is being destroyed by these foods and medicines because they interfere with the healthy productivity of the American population and reduce lifespan.
virtually every grocery store in America sells a vast array of foods that promote chronic diseases. Foods made with white flour are very common. That includes most breads, cookies, crackers, pastries and pastas. And this one ingredient -- refined white flour -- strips the body of essential nutrition, leaving it deficient in B vitamins as well as minerals like magnesium and zinc. These are precisely the minerals that children need in order to build healthy nervous systems and avoid behavioral disorders later in life. These are also the same nutrients that pregnant women need to be able to give birth to babies that don't have birth defects.
Every grocery store in America sells foods containing cancer-causing chemicals (sodium nitrite), heart disease promoting ingredients (hydrogenated oils), and drinks that promote osteoporosis and bone loss (carbonated soft drinks). It's almost like a disease store, not a grocery store, since most items on the shelves are actually "disease in a box" rather than real food.
In Washington these days, there's a lot of talk about "protecting Americans." But I say that if we really want to protect Americans, we need to start banning the food ingredients that are killing Americans. We could save hundreds of thousands of lives each year right here in America if we just banned hydrogenated oils, high-fructose corn syrup, and the refining of whole-grain flour into unhealthful white, bleached flour.
And if we told Americans the truth about their foods -- if we gave them honest nutritional advice and dietary advice -- we would help people make better decisions that would eliminate chronic disease in their own life, and, for expectant mothers, allow them to give birth to children without birth defects. We need honest food labeling and we need to outlaw toxic ingredients like aspartame, monosodium glutamate, food additives and chemical preservatives like sodium nitrite that directly cause cancers of the digestive tract.
These ingredients are, technically, chemical assaults on the American public. While the Bush administration is out there worrying about biological agents like anthrax and smallpox, people are consuming bacon every morning all across America made with sodium nitrite, a chemical additive that causes colon cancer. And yet the USDA remains silent. The FDA remains silent. The Bush administration remains silent. And the food companies, playing a full-press game of food politics, continue to insist that all of these ingredients are perfectly good for you, even while suppressing precisely the information that would educate you about ways to enhance your health by making healthier food choices.
Thankfully, there is a growing list of pioneering doctors and researchers
Television drug ads engage in such blatant deceptions and exaggerations that even the medical journals are starting to condemn the practice. This week, the Annals of Family Medicine published an analysis of popular drug advertisements that concluded the ads essentially lie to the public about the benefits of pharmaceuticals while utterly ignoring alternative health strategies like dietary or lifestyle changes.
The advertising practices of drug companies are so outrageous that even David Kessler, the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, penned an editorial condemning them. In fact, Kessler says television ads never should have been allowed by the FDA in the first place (the FDA legalized drug ads in late 1997, after Kessler left his position there). Today, the United States is the only industrialized nation in the world to allow drug ads on television.
Pharmaceuticals don't treat health conditions, only symptoms. None of these drugs have ever cured anyone, nor made them fundamentally healthier. In fact, most pharmaceuticals cause damage to various organs of the body, including liver damage, heart damage, brain damage and kidney damage. Many pharmaceuticals cause heart attacks and strokes, and nearly all pharmaceuticals cause nutritional deficiencies that are almost never mentioned by doctors, drug companies or even the FDA. Furthermore, most drugs don't even work on most people. To be approved by the FDA, a pharmaceutical only has to demonstrate some effect on about five percent of those who take it.
Even the FDA approval of today's popular pharmaceuticals is based almost entirely on fraudulent science, manipulated by drug companies to produce the statistics they desire so that the corrupt FDA decision makers can approve it for widespread use. The drug approval panels, meanwhile, are deliberately and routinely stacked with decision makes who maintain strong financial ties to the very drug companies impacted by their votes.
And then there's the fraudulent practice of off-label prescribing, too, which means that a drug approved for ANY condition can be legally prescribed for ALL conditions, regardless of whether it has undergone a single test for those conditions. Example: A drug approved for migraine headaches can be legally prescribed for heart disease, even if it hasn't undergone a single clinical trial for heart disease. So much for the grand claims of "evidence-based medicine."
Pharmaceutical medicine, as practiced today, is a grand medical hoax involving the mainstream media, the FDA, drug companies, medical journals, medical schools and even M.D.s. They've all quietly agreed to do whatever it takes to maximize profits at the expense of public health, regardless of the science or the ethics involved. So-called "evidence-based medicine" has become modern-day quackery. Statin drugs, for example, have now been proven to offer absolutely no medical benefit whatsoever to women, with zero reduction in the risk of heart attacks or strokes. HRT drugs have been scientifically proven to actually cause breast cancer and heart attacks, not prevent them. Antidepressant drugs cause diabetes, and diabetes drugs cause liver damage. I could go on, but you get the point.
All of this is of absolutely no concern to the FDA and drug companies, who just keep pushing these toxic chemicals through blatantly fraudulent TV advertisements that are extremely effective at selling products, but utterly useless at improving peoples' health.
From 1992 to 2003, while the U.S. population increased 14 percent, the number of 12 to 17 year olds who abused controlled prescription drugs jumped 212 percent and the number of adults 18 and older abusing such drugs climbed 81 percent.
• From 1992 to 2003, abuse of controlled prescription drugs grew at a rate twice that of marijuana abuse; five times that of coc aine abuse; 60 times that of heroin abuse.
• From 1992 to 2003, the number of people abusing controlled prescription drugs increased seven times faster than the increase in the U.S. population.
• The 15.1 million Americans abusing controlled prescription drugs exceed the combined number abusing coc aine (5.9 million), hallucinogens (4.0 million), inhalants (2.1 million) and heroin (.3 million).