It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Killed by who agit8d?
I find it funny you seem to omit who is killing these people in Iraq. Its not Americans killing them, its the ensuing civil war. Lay blame where it belongs.
Did you know there's a town there with movie theaters, fast food joints,
Originally posted by stumason
Did you know there's a town there with movie theaters, fast food joints,
Oh my god. The sign of progress in Iraq is Cinema's and Burger Kings. Poor point not very well made there chap.
[edit on 9/3/07 by stumason]
Originally posted by stumason
Oh my god. The sign of progress in Iraq is Cinema's and Burger Kings. Poor point not very well made there chap.
[edit on 9/3/07 by stumason]
Originally posted by stumason
Er, who started the War?
Originally posted by Connected
I vote Agit8dChop for the "Way Above Misleading Info Award".
Agit8dChop go visit Iraq and then come back, and THEN tell us your point of view.
Originally posted by Connected
The pictures you show are NOT from the USA's hand. It's basically a civil war! They are killing themselves over there!
Originally posted by Connected
Believe it or not, USA's weapons and tactics are HIGHLY ACCURATE. We usually can not shoot someone without first getting clearance, and when we do, we hardly ever miss, or kill something that wasn't intended to be killed.
Originally posted by Connected
***cut the big heart-string pulling paragraph to get to the point*********
All USA want's is a peaceful Iraq. That agenda alone is worth the lives lost.
Originally posted by stumason
It was bloody well peaceful before the "Coalition" showed up. Granted, Saddam was an utter git and thousands died over a 35 year period, but prior to `91 it was the most prosperous, westernised country in the ME and would have made a great ally.
Now, after 2003, it's a cesspit. Well done.
Originally posted by stumason
I assume you've just got back yourself then? What did you do out there?
Originally posted by stumason
In a War started by the USA. Yes, they are killing each other, but everyone warned of the post invasion problems you'd face but were ignored because the USA knew best. Well done! Mission Completed! Whatever....
Originally posted by stumason
Give over. There are plenty of cases of US forces not only shooting up civvies, but their own allies (ie us Brits) as well. i suppose the accuracy part is correct, but give over about the clearance needed, or not "killing something that wasn't meant to be killed" rubbish.
Originally posted by stumason
It was bloody well peaceful before the "Coalition" showed up.
Originally posted by marg6043
....historical facts of the time when our own elected officials used to sleep in the same bed with Saddam . . .
And then make him an enemy when greed and oil grab was to good to resists . . .
You have voted Agit8dChop for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by marg6043
Connected can you please enlighten us on how Saddam started the invasion of Iraq? his own country?
He started the war you said.
BTW my husband served for one year in the first gulf war and that was because of the invasion of Kuwait. . .
Originally posted by Connected
Yes I said Saddam started the "war" not the "invasion". Want to know how? He didn't turn over any of his deadly weapons, nor did he do anything to stop the terrorists against USA.
All he had to do was show us his bio/chemical weapons, or dirty bombs, or any other type of WMD, and then insured us that he would not give these weapons to the terrorists against USA, and Iraq wouldn't have been invaded.
Since he didn't do any of the above, we could not trust him, and we went to business.
Originally posted by Connected
He didn't turn over any of his deadly weapons, nor did he do anything to stop the terrorists against USA.
The issue of Iraq's disarmament reached a crisis in 2002-2003, when U.S. President George W. Bush demanded a complete end to alleged Iraqi production and use of weapons of mass destruction
In March 2003 the U.S. government announced that "diplomacy has failed" and that it would proceed with a coalition of allied countries, named "coalition of the willing", to rid Iraq of its alleged weapons of mass destruction
All he had to do was show us his bio/chemical weapons, or dirty bombs, or any other type of WMD, and then insured us that he would not give these weapons to the terrorists against USA, and Iraq wouldn't have been invaded.
WASHINGTON - The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks reported Wednesday that Osama bin Laden met with a top Iraqi official in 1994 but found “no credible evidence” of a link between Iraq and al-Qaida in attacks against the United States.
Since he didn't do any of the above, we could not trust him, and we went to business.
Originally posted by Connected
marg6043 I'm sorry to say but you are just another sheep. Thats not an insult, that is just the only way I can describe the fact that you don't know the full story.
Using the wiki and msnbc links as a resource lol.
Did you know, bio/chemical weapons were found in Iraq? A LOT. Those are WMD's. Do you really think Saddam himself was in control of these weapons? No, his government was. Did his government have ties with terrorist cells? You bet.
We are still finding WMD's till this day.
SHUUSH
Originally posted by sobolwolf
Originally posted by Rockpuck
People die in wars. Glad you figured that out. Want a cookie now?
She looks a bit like my daughter, you got any kids Rockpuck?
Originally posted by marg6043
BTW you think that the 9/11 commission findings are not true?
Here is a government link, www.9-11commission.gov...
Originally posted by marg6043
Well show me the links to the news stories and then we can have some more debates on the issue, is nothing more that we here in ATS love than a good prof of conspiracies . . .
We are still finding WMD's till this day.
SHUUSH
Like I said Show me the links to the stories . . .