It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kinglizard
I was raised catholic and taught by priests and nuns through school. Maybe 7 years ago I left the Catholic church because of a few things I didn't agree with.
Here is a short list:
- Praying to Saints.
- Worshiping the Mother Mary when Jesus/God should be the only one worshiped.
- The thinking that a priest is closer to God than a normal person and that we should confess our sins to him for judgement when we should be confessing to God.
- Calling a priest "father" when we know that God is the only Father.
- Covering up abuses by Priests made me sick (you know what I'm talking about).
- I have some issues with the way they look at women.
I don't hate the church or anything I just don't agree with the above. I still say the "Lords Prayer" and sign the cross.
Originally posted by thehumbleone
My point is EVERY Christian believes what they believe because the Catholic church chose the books of the new testament.
Originally posted by junglejake
Originally posted by thehumbleone
My point is EVERY Christian believes what they believe because the Catholic church chose the books of the new testament.
I think you're going to have to back that up with more than just saying the Council of Nicea chose them...What are you basing that statement on?
www.antiochian.org... _Where_Why/Who_Gave_Us_The_New_Testament.htm
With the passage of time the Church discerned which writings were truly Apostolic and which were not. It was a prolonged struggle taking place over several centuries in which the Church decided what books were her own. As part of the process of discerning, the Church met together in council. These various Church councils met to deal with many varied issues, among which was the canon of Scripture.
These councils met to discern and formally confirm what was already generally accepted within the Church at large. They did not legislate Scripture as much as they set forth what had become self-evident truth and practice within the Churches of God. The councils sought to proclaim the common mind of the Church and reflect the unanimity of faith, practice, and tradition of the local Churches represented.
The Church Councils provide us with specific records in which the Church spoke clearly and in unison as to what constitutes Scripture. Among the many councils that met during the first four centuries, two particularly stand out:
1. The Council of Laodicea, which met in Asia Minor, around A.D. 363. This council stated that only canonical books of the Old and New Testaments should be used in the Church. It forbade reading other books in Church. It enumerated the canonical books of our present Old and New Testaments, with the exception of the Apocalypse of Saint John. This is the first council which clearly listed the canonical books. Its decisions were widely accepted in the Eastern Church.
2. The Third Council of Carthage, which met in North Africa, around A.D. 397.This Council, attended by Augustine, provided a full list of the canonical books of both Old and New Testaments. The 27 books of the present day New Testament were accepted as canonical. It also held that these books should be read in the Church as Divine Scripture to the exclusion of all others. This Council was widely accepted as authoritative in the West.
Originally posted by thehumbleone
These councils met to discern and formally confirm what was already generally accepted within the Church at large. They did not legislate Scripture as much as they set forth what had become self-evident truth and practice within the Churches of God.
2. The Third Council of Carthage, which met in North Africa, around A.D. 397.This Council, attended by Augustine, provided a full list of the canonical books of both Old and New Testaments. The 27 books of the present day New Testament were accepted as canonical. It also held that these books should be read in the Church as Divine Scripture to the exclusion of all others. This Council was widely accepted as authoritative in the West.
Originally posted by thehumbleone
shihulud, did you not read the links I provided?
No, the eastern orthodox churh did not decide what was to be put in the bible.
Originally posted by thehumbleone
Do you realize who it is that chose these books?
I'll tell you who it is, it's the Catholic church who chose them, that's who.
Originally posted by thehumbleone
Do you know who chose the books that would be in the new testament?
The very books you base you faith upon, the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The acts of the apostles all the way to the book of Revelation.
Do you realize who it is that chose these books?
I'll tell you who it is, it's the Catholic church who chose them, that's who.
No matter what you may have against us, always remember that reason you believe what you believe is because the Catholic church chose the books of the new testament.
[edit on 7-3-2007 by thehumbleone]
Originally posted by shihulud
Originally posted by thehumbleone
shihulud, did you not read the links I provided?
No, the eastern orthodox churh did not decide what was to be put in the bible.
You answer but one question!!!! And as usual it is the one that conflicts with your beliefs
Even if rome had some jurisdiction in this matter, Constantine (who wasnt even a christian for most of his life) was the head of the EOC and played it to his advatage.
However wouldnt you think the original christian church would be the one that james set up in jerusalem, you know the one that paul superceded with his own version for the gentiles????? The Roman Catholic Church????
So it would seem that catholics are still wrong and the bible is therefore total crap decided by a fake religion!!
G
Im a non-believer but i dont hate the church or anyone else for that matter. But if your above statement is a reflection of Catholics i can certainly understand why some may dislike Catholics.
Your statement above comes across as an extremely arrogant put down, ie, so what you dont like us but we invented everything you believe in so nahnahnanana. Who cares who chose them, didnt it all come from God, or is that all just a sham after all.
Not very humble from someone called "thehumbleone" imo.
[edit on 7/3/07 by mojo4sale]
Originally posted by thehumbleone
Originally posted by shihulud
Originally posted by thehumbleone
shihulud, did you not read the links I provided?
No, the eastern orthodox churh did not decide what was to be put in the bible.
You answer but one question!!!! And as usual it is the one that conflicts with your beliefs
Even if rome had some jurisdiction in this matter, Constantine (who wasnt even a christian for most of his life) was the head of the EOC and played it to his advatage.
However wouldnt you think the original christian church would be the one that james set up in jerusalem, you know the one that paul superceded with his own version for the gentiles????? The Roman Catholic Church????
So it would seem that catholics are still wrong and the bible is therefore total crap decided by a fake religion!!
G
Shihulud, you are wrong once again.
You obviously have no idea how these books were chosen.