It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Furthermore, being that conspiracy theorists don't trust the government, even if evidence were provided, they probably still wouldn't believe it.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The point debunkers make though is that, they're being asked by the conspiracy theorists to disprove a negative.
If one proposes a theory about an event, the burden of proof is on them.
It's not possible to prove an impossibility, which is where the logical fallacy comes into play.
Furthermore, being that conspiracy theorists don't trust the government, even if evidence were provided, they probably still wouldn't believe it.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
As for WTC steel being destroyed-
The USS New York has steel from the WTC in it, there's beams in various museums(including the Special Operations Museum at Ft Bragg, NC). I'm pretty sure that were further study required, samples could be found.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
I have been asking the people who believe in the official story for over a year to show some real, hard evidence or FBI / NTSB reports to support the official story. I have not seen any yet.
Thier is not enough evidence to prove the government was behind 911 (YET) but thier is planty of evidence that proofs the government knows more then what they are telling and may have let it happen.
[edit on 2-3-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Ypu might want to diversify your evidence portfolio eventually, nutyeah, good point. and the "debunkers" continue to stay away. This is a pattern.
Originally posted by Lexion
My proof, after ?
Nothing else in the U.S. has been blown up.
Enough for me.
Lex