It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by admriker444
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the NWO folks advocate taking away property rights. This makes no sense to me. Wouldnt this hurt the rich elitists even more so than me ??? Why would someone like rockefeller promote such a philosophy if they stood to lose all their family property ?
Also, I dont understand this whole corporate-led takeover and enslavement conspiracy theory. If we're all slaves with no property working on some commune, who the hell is going to buy their products ???
To me the whole idea of an NWO takeover (the conspiracy viewpoint) makes no sense if it will hurt the very corporations that seek profit.
Originally posted by passenger
In the U.S. the elimination of property rights has already begun, Google Kelo v. CIty of New London.
This doesn't mean the termination of all property rights-just for the common man. As stated aptly above, the middle and lower class is being reduced to the state of serfdom.
A misconception seem to be that the NWO is avowedly Communist. Whereas, I see it as Fascist in nature. That means a centrally controlled economy but with limited property rights for certain individuals (corporations mostly) and those of the select few. Study the economic structure of Nazi Germany to see how it worked. It's happening almost point for point here.
Originally posted by admriker444
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the NWO folks advocate taking away property rights. This makes no sense to me. Wouldnt this hurt the rich elitists even more so than me ??? Why would someone like rockefeller promote such a philosophy if they stood to lose all their family property ?
Also, I dont understand this whole corporate-led takeover and enslavement conspiracy theory. If we're all slaves with no property working on some commune, who the hell is going to buy their products ???
To me the whole idea of an NWO takeover (the conspiracy viewpoint) makes no sense if it will hurt the very corporations that seek profit.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by admriker444
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the NWO folks advocate taking away property rights. This makes no sense to me. Wouldnt this hurt the rich elitists even more so than me ??? Why would someone like rockefeller promote such a philosophy if they stood to lose all their family property ?
Also, I dont understand this whole corporate-led takeover and enslavement conspiracy theory. If we're all slaves with no property working on some commune, who the hell is going to buy their products ???
To me the whole idea of an NWO takeover (the conspiracy viewpoint) makes no sense if it will hurt the very corporations that seek profit.
The abolition of private property is the doctrine of the Communists, not the wealthy capitalists.
The Communist line follows the phrase "Property is theft!" In other words, Communists view the entire earth not as "property" per se, but as Mother Nature giving us a temporary home. To think we can "own" it would be ridiculous.
The wealthy elite love private property, and wouldn't let it go without a fight. You are 100 percent correct: it's the property that makes them "wealthy elite" to begin with. And according to the Communists, this is precisely reason that private property has to go.
It's interesting that all the crazy, wild anti-Communist propaganda has come from the same sources: rich, elitist capitalists.