It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
global warming cant be stopped. nobody is gonna stop driving their car. nobody is gonna stop heating their house. nobody is gonna stop doing things they do because we are accustomed to doing these things.
Originally posted by Paresthesia
global warming cant be stopped. nobody is gonna stop driving their car. nobody is gonna stop heating their house. nobody is gonna stop doing things they do because we are accustomed to doing these things.
Global warming is going to happen regardless, like you said. So why should politicians discuss it?
According to the Greens, during the post-war boom global warming should have pushed temperatures up. But the opposite happened. "As a matter of the fact, the decrease in temperature, which was very noticeable in the 60s and 70s, led many people to fear that we would be going into another ice age," remembers Fred Singer, former Chief Scientist with the US Weather Program.
What's more, 100 million years ago, there was six times as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as there is now, yet the temperature then was marginally cooler than it is today. Many scientists have concluded that carbon dioxide doesn't even affect climate.
Although many environmentalists have been forced to accept much of the scientific evidence against global warming, they still argue that it is better to be safe than sorry. So they continue to use global warming as a reason to oppose industrialisation and economic growth.
Originally posted by Paresthesia
Global warming is going to happen regardless, like you said. So why should politicians discuss it?
Originally posted by RRconservative
Maybe because Global Warming is a myth.
It would be like politicians worrying about unicorns!
Take a look at this site. Great info!
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by Paresthesia
Global warming is going to happen regardless, like you said. So why should politicians discuss it?
Why continue to contribute to the problem? Why exacerbate it? :shk: I don't understand your line of "reasoning" at all.