It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GwionX
If these powerful directional charges, strong enough to level all of the support columns, were causing all this destruction, then where are any signs of Squibs?
Originally posted by GwionX
Once that happens not even the best demolitionists and firemen know where the building might fail.
Evil super-beings would have had to know that the North tower was going to cause enough damage to WTC7 to even make this theory even debateable.
How do we know that all tube in tube designed steel buildings wont do the same thing in a similar situation in the future?
Originally posted by GwionX
Can we all agree that WTC7 was badly damaged before it fell?
It freaks me out to hear people saying "it was nothing" "just superficial stuff"
Like a window got broken..or art was knocked off the wall, or someones make-up case got spilled.
Once that happens not even the best demolitionists and firemen know where the building might fail.
Originally posted by GwionX
Can we all agree that WTC7 was badly damaged before it fell?
It freaks me out to hear people saying "it was nothing" "just superficial stuff"
Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever caused a steel framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.
Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
CTers are proposing that unknown individuals were clever enough to sneak in huge quantities of explosives under peoples noses
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
CTers are proposing that unknown individuals were clever enough to sneak in huge quantities of explosives under peoples noses
Well if the building was so severly damged and all the floors gutted by fire it would not take a huge quantity of explosives. WTC 7 was evacuated several hours before so thier would have been no sneaking in under peoples noses.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Thank you to all on a great thread with great points... same old questions though.
The beginning of the video shows smoke pouring out of almost all the floors. This is not smoke or dust from the debris of the collapsed towers as we once thought.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Thank you to all on a great thread with great points... same old questions though.
I would like to say that this video has lead me to believe that the fires were even more severe than I had first thought. I'm sure some believe the same. I think that just because you can't see the flames, does NOT mean there isnt fire. The beginning of the video shows smoke pouring out of almost all the floors. This is not smoke or dust from the debris of the collapsed towers as we once thought. (yes i thought so too) There are fires on MANY floors of this building that were showered with debris. Lets keep in mind there were minimal firefighting efforts going on. The last two hours there was ZERO.
There are fires on MANY floors of this building that were showered with debris.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Ultima? come on now! Your a pretty smart guy. But Geesh! to even THINK that CD experts could look at a 47 story skyscraper burning out of control and say...."ok lets all run into this burning building... plant EXPLOSIVES...and detonate in under 2 hours????" Dude... your reaching here. Remember the last two hours all the firemen were doing was pretty much standing around watching it burn. Of the hundreds of firefighters..not one ever mentioned seeing a crew of people running into the building with explosives.
Sorry... not one of your better posts.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well for 1 if you rememebr from the report from the EPA recovering the fuel states that thier was probly no fires on the ground floor because other wise they would have recovered all the fuel.
Second all personel including firemen were moved back beyond a safety zone around building 7.
Third as stated several times and backed up by fire department, no steel buiding has collapsed due to fire and or structural damage.
Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
CTers are proposing that unknown individuals were clever enough to sneak in huge quantities of explosives under peoples noses, plan to have aircraft crashed into buildings at different locations and all the rest of the ingenious stuff...]
In the first place I cannot see any body in the US being capable of planning the alleged conspiracy in all its permutations
So IMHO they had no need to demo the buildings, a bit of flame was enough!!
Originally posted by CameronFox
~ The safety zone was i believe 100yards. And there were fireman around the entire perimeter. NONE of which witnessed anyone sneaking into a building carrying hundreds if not thousands of pounds of explosives with them.
~ You and others can state that till the cows come home. Just please remember that NEVER has a steel building been showered with debris from a skyscraper that was collapsing, burns out of control with MINIMAL fire operations, then left to burn for two hours. Look at the video...look at the holes in the building.