It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Not just from the frames but also eyewitness and physical evidence and common sense. The frames prove little, but do nothing at all to disprove a 757.
Originally posted by Mck526
Yes Ive already seen both, the animation is a bunch of horse#, the second one i strongly agree with... what the hell is that thing? looks so close to being a missile... but look at the video the cop car is only half the size of the thing.
Originally posted by Surface
This guy's job was to measure size via images for the government... apparently we really can trust what we see versus what we are told we are seeing.
Originally posted by lizziex3
yeah. because the government knocking over the lightpolls makes so much sense. seriously. if I told you the moon was really a square would you believe me just because the government says otherwise?
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Mck526
thank you ultima1, and whats more dumb, how can you beliebve about the debris? the plane supposivdly was insinerated when it struck... but somehow those pieces were not singed at all?? yea im sure, next thing i will here is that there was a survivor
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Ultima, I'm not sure where you get your information, but full bodies/remains were recovered for each and every passenger on that jet including the hijackers. Those for which the pathologists had DNA samples for, were identified (which includes the entire crew and passengers on the jet)
Or are you going to claim that you dont believe this because the FBI/NTSB did not come to your house and give you a report about it?
Dr. John Butler is a research chemist within the Biotechnology Division at NIST. He has written Forensic DNA Typing: Biology and Technology behind STR Markers (Academic Press, 2001), which received high honors from the British Medical Association Book Competition in November 2001 and is now the leading textbook in the field. President George W. Bush recognized Dr. Butler in July 2002 as one of 60 young scientists to receive the prestigious Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). Dr. Butler leads the forensics/human identity testing project team at NIST and has been involved in the field for the past ten years developing new methods and technologies for forensic DNA typing.
Due to the nature of the World Trade Center disaster, it quickly became evident that traditional methods for performing DNA typing were not likely to be fully successful in identifying all of the recovered remains. Traditional DNA ID methods depend on the presence of long, intact segments of DNA in order to accurately type the sample. The DNA in many of the samples recovered in this situation were so fragmented that these standard methods were ineffective.
In early November 2001, Dr. Robert Shaler, the director of the WTC DNA identification effort, contacted me and asked if I would be willing to develop some new DNA tests to help in the identification effort. I agreed to fast track our research efforts over the next several months and produce some test materials for his laboratory to try by January 2002.
The remains of five people killed in the terrorist attack on the Pentagon were damaged beyond identification in the massive explosion and fire after a hijacked airliner crashed into the building's west side, officials said.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I'd be fair and ask you (either Ultima or Mck or Nick or Surface) to try to convince me, but there's not a new trick you could pull -I've been studying them all and have answers for all. The small hole, the "lack" of plane parts, the unmarked lawn, the seized videos, the white blur, the eyewitnesses, etc.
And finally not everything about 9/11 was a lie. I think we all agree w/the Gov that it was on a Tuesday. So the question is where to draw the line of disagreement. I'm of the belief that FACTS are valuable in this process, not Stubblebine or Rokke or Nelson or Avery or Von Kleist or Flocco or Szymanski or... .
Originally posted by Mck526
ultima1 has the exact point, how could they identify every passenger and hijackers. but when a plane made of metal and steel hits the pentagon it is demolished into dust? it just doesnt make sense... that must mean bodies are stronger than airplanes
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Holy cow you guys just keep going! Surface: Stubblebine is a kook. He thinks he can walk thru walls and will lve to 250. What diff does it make if HE thinks the plane doesn't fit? The evidence is what matters. I don't think he believes what he says anyway. He's most likely another disinfo agent, paid or volunteer.
And I'll take the silence on my original answer to MCK's original question as a "no thank you, I don't really want to see the 757. I prefer my fantasy." I'd be fair and ask you (either Ultima or Mck or Nick or Surface) to try to convince me, but there's not a new trick you could pull -I've been studying them all and have answers for all. The small hole, the "lack" of plane parts, the unmarked lawn, the seized videos, the white blur, the eyewitnesses, etc.
And finally not everything about 9/11 was a lie. I think we all agree w/the Gov that it was on a Tuesday. So the question is where to draw the line of disagreement. I'm of the belief that FACTS are valuable in this process, not Stubblebine or Rokke or Nelson or Avery or Von Kleist or Flocco or Szymanski or... .