It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You’ve probably heard of a molecule called DNA, otherwise known as "The Blueprint Of Life".
Molecular biologists have been examining and mapping the DNA for a few decades now. But as they’ve looked more closely at the DNA, they’ve been getting increasingly bothered by one inconvenient little fact - the fact that 97% of the DNA is junk, and it has no known use or function!
But, an usual collaboration between molecular biologists, cryptoanalysists (people who break secret codes), linguists (people who study languages) and physicists, has found strange hints of a hidden language in this so- called "junk DNA".
Only about 3% of the DNA actually codes for amino acids, which in turn make proteins, and eventually, little babies. The remaining 97% of the DNA is, according to conventional wisdom, not gems, but junk.
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
My money's on it being a movie script.
UFO disclosure.
Originally posted by plopunisher
What if it is that the ununsed DNA is our un-used potential as humans?
As we evolve, more of that "junk" turns to good DNA.
Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
Originally posted by plopunisher
What if it is that the ununsed DNA is our un-used potential as humans?
As we evolve, more of that "junk" turns to good DNA.
It's a nice sci-fi'ish idea, but a lot of it is endless repetition of one codon like "stop stop stop stop stop stop stop", stretches that look similar to other coding DNA, only it's got point mutations, or it's obvious retroviruses with the promotor regions damaged so that they can't replicate. Sort of like being infected with HIV, then the HIV regions that were inserted into your DNA were damaged so they couldn't work anymore.
Some of it looks like it might be used for "jumping genes" to swap in and out of currently active genes, you'd want that part, and some people think that some percentage of it is structural coding. Given that some of it is strongly conserved I'd have to bet that it's useful in some way.
But having "unused DNA that turns into good DNA as we evolve" doesn't even make sense, really. Evolution is the process of making good DNA. If it's there to begin with, then we would have had to have devolved at some point, conserved the DNA for some reason, and then reincorporated it. Which doesn't make sense, except maybe to Steven Spielberg.