It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lizziex3
Since when were there no firefighters in WTC7 when Silverstein said to pull?
Originally posted by lizziex3
And how does that building prove anything. When that guy said "pull" he ment to pull the building down using cables, they didn't use explosives.
Originally posted by lizziex3
I can't explain why WTC6 didn't collapse..maybe because it was only 8 stories tall and didn't have debris jammed into its lower corner un-balancing the weight?
Originally posted by lizziex3
Once again: Since when do firefighters have the power to "pull" a building? I'm going to ask my co-worker who was a firefighter for 15 years how many buildings he got to blow up during his career and see what he says
and also once again even though the other poster said it as well:
Pull is a term for "pulling" a building down with cables, NOT for demolishing it with explosives, okay?
Originally posted by lizziex3
the thing is, it did NOT fall symetrically. i really suggest you watch the video Screw Loose Change (though i doubt you will) it talks about WTC7 in the very beginning so you wouldn't have to watch all of it. also when i said building, i ment video, i just wasn't thinking and typed it wrong. Also, Pull is NOT, i repeat, NOT a term for using explosives. is IS, i repeat, IS a term for getting the firefighters out of the building. And where is your proof that the firefighters were evacuated early, surely everyone else was, but the firefighters stayed until their commander told them to PULL OUT. I am confused as to why you even made this thread, you're obviously not going to change your mind about what you think no matter how much evidence is provided.
Originally posted by lizziex3
the thing is, it did NOT fall symetrically.
Originally posted by lizziex3
I know it IS a demolition term, just NOT one used when blowing up buildings, but when PULLING them down with cables.
Here's a graphic estimate of how much of the building was actually damaged by the impact of Tower One:
As you can see, WTC 7 is clearly in the debris field for the collapse of WTC 1; indeed in this picture it looks as though some debris might have gone over the WTC 7 building.
I think these photos were photoshopped or air brushed by the government to hide WTC7's south face. Maybe to hide the exact positions of the fires, because it would give away the fact that all the major financial bank floors are on fire. Or just to hide the lack of damage to WTC 7.