It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Q: How can scientists be so mystified by gravity
yet also claim to explain it?
A: This is a basic conflict in our science. There is an
unspoken collective agreement in our educational institutions
to teach clearly flawed explanations since they really have no
alternative. In actuality, today’s scientists know nothing about
the true nature of gravity.
Gravitational Perpetual Motion:
As we all know, perpetual motion machines are impossible,
and claims of such devices are a clear sign of bad science.
No device (or natural phenomenon) can operate endlessly
without draining a power source, and certainly no device can
operate without a power source at all. Yet, our science states
that an object dropped into a tunnel cut through the Earth would
oscillate back and forth endlessly from one end of the planet
to the other. This is the result predicted by both Newton's and
Einstein's theories of gravity, yet this belief clearly violates our
most elementary laws of physics as well as common sense.
There is no claim of a draining power source, nor even any
mention of a power source at all to drive this process. Despite
detailed atomic theories and even having split the atom we
have never identified a gravitational power source.
Originally posted by Sly62659
magnets have already been used in travel. Ever heard of the bullet train? the track i an electro-magnet. the train has another. The same polarized magnets repel allowing the train to move really really fast lol.
* Patent Application US 2006/0163971 (appft1.uspto.gov... n.IN.&s2=%22Magnetic+Power%22.AS.&OS=IN/Gunderson+AND+AN/%22Magnetic+Power%22&RS=IN/Gunderson+AND+AN/%22Magnetic+Power%22) (PDF (pesn.com...)) Pending; Solid State Electric Generator; July 27, 2006.
Abstract
A solid-state electrical generator including at least one permanent magnet, magnetically coupled to a ferromagnetic core provided with at least one hole penetrating its volume; the hole(s) and magnet(s) being placed such that the hole(s) penetrating the ferromagnetic core's volume intercept flux from the permanent magnet(s) coupled into the ferromagnetic core. A first wire coil is wound around the ferromagnetic core for the purpose of moving the coupled permanent magnet flux within the ferromagnetic core. A second wire is routed through the hole(s) penetrating the volume of the ferromagnetic core, for the purpose of intercepting this moving magnetic flux, thereby inducing an output electromotive force. A changing voltage applied to the first wire coil causes coupled permanent magnet flux to move within the core relative to the hole(s) penetrating the core volume, thus inducing electromotive force along wire(s) passing through the hole(s) in the ferromagnetic core. The mechanical action of an electrical generator is thereby synthesized without use of moving parts.
* Magnetic Power Inc. Patent Application Published (pesn.com...) - Patent describes a Solid State Electric Generator, the first in a series of Magnetic Power Modules™ that the company says will produce electric power with no moving parts and no need for fuel. (PESN; July 28, 2006)
* MPI Press Release (magneticpowerinc.com...), July 27, 2006
Originally posted by Beer_Guy
Great topic, something I've been exploring for quite a while.
Just to clear things up though,,,, magnets do weaken over time and eventually lose their power. They aren't forever.
Heating a magnet past its Curie point will destroy the long range ordering.
Originally posted by Beer_Guy
Great topic, something I've been exploring for quite a while.
Just to clear things up though,,,, magnets do weaken over time and eventually lose their power. They aren't forever.
If magnetism & gravity ARE closely related, then maybe a small singularity could prove to be a possible perpetual power source. I don't think they "degauss".
Originally posted by Infinite motion
Eh?
Sorry magnets are in no way connected to gravity.
Einstein has already explained what gravity is.
I don't understand why everyone thinks Einstein should be and is 100% correct about everything he ever wrote about.
Anyway, gravity and magnets are EXACTLY the same thing. I dare you to prove otherwise.
Originally posted by Infinite motion
Maybe because he has proven his theory that gravity is nothing more then the visual effects of curved space-time.
Originally posted by Infinite motion
A magnet still works in zero gravity, so how can gravity be the same as a magnet? If they were indeed interconnected then wouldn't a magnet fail to work in zero gravity?
Originally posted by Infinite motion
Sorry but there is no such thing as perpetual motion.
Bring me evidence of the possibilities for it and i may think otherwise.
Originally posted by Infinite motion
Edit to include thoughts on Edward Leedskalnins:
Firstly there isn't much there to keep me remotely interested.
Secondly this is not a "new" science. People have know that magnets can perform strange feats, but is not perpetual motion.
By the way, thanks for the link to the Castle, not sure what it has to do with the topic but fascinating.
Indeed science cannot explain everthing.
Originally posted by Infinite motion
Example: Photons have no mass, yet are still affected by gravity. How if they have no mass for gravity to attract?