It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They are sending over forces that are already trained. They are not increasing the forces size, they are simply moving more forces too Iraq. As in poorly thought out, a admit I do not have much info on the subject but, I still wanted to point this out as a possiblity.
Originally posted by FreiMaurer
Considering the US is not "weed-whacking" but increasing its force size this is pretty poorly thought out.
Originally posted by halfmask
..... What if that is what Bush is doing. Sending all these forces in Iraq half heartedly to make way to a better military. This is just another theory to consider but, here on ATS we always talk about black projects excetra, what if Bush or the heads of the military, are making room for a new more advanced army. Just a thought.
[edit on 26-1-2007 by halfmask]
Originally posted by halfmask
A sad thought just occured to me. I was just wondering about the war in Iraq, and the not so great outcome so far. Then I remebered an article on budget problems the military is currently having. The two thoughts about budget and the loses in Iraq crossed. From this I remebered a military game I play on the PC, medieval total war. Most of you most likly haven't played the game but, one part of it is to manage your money between your forces and what not. I always end up with too much military expences, due to the cost of sustaing all my units.(They have a yearly fee in the game/maintenance costs). To solve this problem, I simply send my out of date/useless troops in to hopless battle so they get killed thus, I don't have to pay for them anymore. What if that is what Bush is doing. Sending all these forces in Iraq half heartedly to make way to a better military. This is just another theory to consider but, here on ATS we always talk about black projects excetra, what if Bush or the heads of the military, are making room for a new more advanced army. Just a thought.
[edit on 26-1-2007 by halfmask]
Originally posted by ShooterSix
Originally posted by halfmask
.........
[edit on 26-1-2007 by halfmask]
There's a major flaw to your thinking. The US military is mainly losing MEN, not tanks, jets, etc etc.
So unless Bush is trying to replace all of our dead marines with robotic soldiers for a more "advanced" army, you need to seriously reconsider your position.