posted on Jan, 23 2007 @ 09:05 AM
Originally posted by Stockburn
Agreed. I see two trails on the "plane'.
There is nothing strange in that if you see two trails on the plane.Its because the airplane is very far away and the video camera was not on tripod(
due to camera movement)plus that time I used the maxim digital zoom and so it shows the contrail like duble.Nothing strange on that.
Important are those two spheres that are moving from the left side of the screen and also the sphere that was appearing and disappeared.It is a real
footage of an unknown object captured in a clear day at 11:38 AM.I filmed and I know what I saw.I saw a big thing in the sky, just above my house,
appearing from nowhere. It was looking like a big egg but very shiny like gold. It was very hard on the eyes because of its light reflection.
It was looking somehow like this one from the picture bellow as an example:
If I will go tomorow in the day time at 12 AM and start filming do you think that I can capture the same thing again?Those kind of object you can't
capture everyday.It was just luck.I was just at the right time in the right moment with a camera in the hand.
Those unknown objects were for the first time that I ever seen something like that in my life.Its unique if you can understand me.The speed of those
objects were amazing.
I don't know what those flying objects were but I know that it is a real video of real UFOs.I am trying for about two years to understand the mystery
of those objects but its realy hard.
Originally posted by Stockburn
I just can't emphasize enough on how video's are cut and presented; means nothing. Give us RAW video. If it has cut screens, slow motion or
verbage it is automatically suspect.
Please insert quarter and try again.
Firts part of the footage is the original part and then are the analysis.
I sent the original footage(60MB for about 17seconds to Johnny Anonymous ufologist/researcher)
The video has been analyzed by a Independent American ufologist/researcher with 28 years of experience and Photo-graphical specialist and were
unable to find any discreptencies in the video. In summary, the agreement is made that the video is not hoaxed. Analysis of the pixelazation and noise
in both the upper and the lower video fields were consistent with a normal unedited video.
If there're any questions about the video please let me know.
Best Regards
Bluegate
[edit on 23-1-2007 by Bluegate]