It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iran has barred 38 inspectors with the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), from entering the country, an Iranian lawmaker was quoted by Iran's ISNA news agency on Monday as saying.
"Iran has decided not to give entry permission to 38 inspectors from the IAEA and has announced this limitation to the IAEA officially," Boroujerdi told ISNA.
Originally posted by ferretman2
But...but it's for 'peaceful' purposes.........
Originally posted by Mdv2
Originally posted by ferretman2
But...but it's for 'peaceful' purposes.........
I agree that Iran would probably be using its enriched uranium for military weapons. But:
1) You don't start a war on speculation
2) You don't start a war on US intelligence (example: Iraq)
3) It's none of the US's business
4) Nuclear weapons are predominantly to strengthen one's political position
And if you believe that they would launch nuclear missiles on Israel, you should stop reading fairy tales.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
False, then what should we start wars with, origami? Just because it was wrong this time doesn't mean it is always unreliable or that we should not trust it in the future.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Nukes + Terrorists make it the US and the rest of the morally conscious world's responsibility. According to Augustine's docrine of war you would be correct, however weapons today aren't what they were in the 15th and 16th centuries. Today the Nuke and the destruction it can cause has changed war theory.
Hence, when there is Nukes + Terrorists(people with known intent) it is morally acceptable to go in early!
Originally posted by ferretman2
Mdv - You happen to forget the other countries the US received 'reliable' intel from:
Germany
France
England
Russia
All angencies failed, it was not just a 'US' intelligence failure.
Originally posted by ferretman2
Oh and now we should go into Dafur.......
Originally posted by ferretman2
The US went into Vietnam under the same pretenses (civil war and to save the French) and look how all 'you' react to that.
Originally posted by Mdv2
Originally posted by ferretman2
But...but it's for 'peaceful' purposes.........
And if you believe that they would launch nuclear missiles on Israel, you should stop reading fairy tales.
The Soviet Union, once Western's biggest enemy, did not launch a single nuclear missile on Western soil, nor has China. Now the magical answer why nuclear weapons have only used once:
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Martyrdom isn't a goal in China or Russia. MAD is only effective against folks that don't wish to die. When you're dealing with an ideology such as the Iranian president has, you can't assume self preservation is as important as in other societies. Waiting for a city to be glowing before action is taken is unacceptable, as the stakes are too high.
Disputes over Iran's nuclear programme must be resolved through dialogue and negotiation, not through the use of force or even threats to use force. To his great credit, the former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw consistently argued while in office that the use of military force against Iran was "inconceivable". However, it is not enough to make pious statements while the inexorable march of events is moving towards a disastrous confrontation. The British Prime Minister Tony Blair has consistently refused to completely rule out a military attack on Iran. In order to make up, in part, for his ill-judged support of the neocon-driven war on Iraq, he must now make a resolute effort to act as an honest broker and mediator between the United States and Iran, and push for a peaceful and honourable solution to the present impasse. That policy would help both Iran and the United States and would be Mr Blair's greatest legacy for posterity. Meanwhile, America's greatest assistance to democracy in Iran would be to give people hope, to recognise Iran's legitimate rights and address her legitimate security concerns. In return, Iran could help stabilise the situation in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon and the Persian Gulf and help resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Iran's population is young, educated, well-informed and outward looking.Iran has the second highest number of per capita internet bloggers in the world, only second to the United States. Persian is incredibly the fourth most commonly used language on the internet. 70% of Iran's 70 million population is below 30. Literacy is at around 80% nationwide, and over 90% among those below the age of 25. There are 22 million pupils in schools and close to 3 million university students, over 60% of them girls. That population can be won over with a genuine hand of friendship, not with threats and bullying. Israel's security, meanwhile, would best be served by an Iranian government that is more engaged with the West than one that is isolated, or by inflicting yet one more disastrous conflict on the region. The policy of sanctions followed by military action and regime change has failed, and is bound to fail again.
Source
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
nor does Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, etc. either frankly...
Originally posted by ferretman2
All Iran has to do is give 60 day notice and they can withdraw fro the NPT and do what-ever they pleae.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
I don't know why this news is surprising. Frankly I'm surprised they didn't kick out the IAEA a while ago. Israel has been harrassing them for over a decade making accusations that they were "this close to the bomb" constantly calling for sanctioning as well, then you allow Israel to go on spouting that they want to attack them openly and publicly, now they have American warships surrounding them, and to top it off, we recently kidnapped 5 of their countrymen in Iraq from a Consulate in progress. I don't know what it is Irael and the USA are trying to accomplish but I think that whatever the results will be it will be nothing but violence and death in the end for people that have no say or control over the matter.
So far they have been allowing not only physical inspection but video monitoring as well, so now what will be the fruit of all this? Secret labratories? More Deep Underground bunkers? This looks like an almost repeat of Iraq and yet people are still behind it. Amazing.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
I'm not sure kidnapping is the most accurate term to use with regards to rounding up FIS types.