It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZEV93
What is annoying to me is the virulent Anti-Americanism from my fellow Germans here.
According to them, Bush is guilty of almost everything
I'm not a Bush friend either, but I still prefer the American Way of Life over living in an islamized Europe with Sharia Law.
I am not sure if the Germans share this view. At least not the radical left and right, they defend the Islamists and Al-Quida wherever they can and make the USA responsible for everything.
Europe is lost anyway. In 30-50 Years, the Muslims will be in a Majority, they will form Parties and change the state from within. Maybe then these German Idiots will wake up. But it will be too late then, because it's already too late NOW.
I am a Librarian and my English is, well, quite good for a German I think
Originally posted by ZEV93
What is really annoying to me is the virulent Anti-Americanism from my fellow Germans here. According to them, Bush is guilty of almost everything. I'm not a Bush friend either, but I still prefer the American Way of Life over living in an islamized Europe with Sharia Law.
Originally posted by subz
Those believing everything that Washington and Tel Aviv (NOT JERUSALEM!) says are delusional at best and complete fools at worst.
Originally posted by RedGolem
U.S. solders launched two raid on Iranian targets in Iraq yesterday. Five Iranians were detained and vast amounts of documents and computer data were seized. The raids are part of a new U.S. military and intelligence operation launched against Iran. The U.S. is trying to identify and capture top officials of the Revolutionary Gard's al-Quds Brigade operation in Iraq. The Brigade is active in arming and training and funding militant movements such as Hezbollah in Lebanon. Containing Iran is now a strategy to end Iraq's violence.
www.concordmonitor.com
.S. troops launched two raids on Iranian targets in Iraq yesterday, following through on President Bush's vow to confront and break up Tehran's networks inside Iraq. Five Iranians were detained, and vast amounts of documents and computer data were confiscated, according to U.S., Iraqi and Iranian officials.
The two raids are part of a new U.S. intelligence and military operation launched last month against Iran, U.S. officials said. The United States is trying to identify and detain top officials of the Revolutionary Guards' al-Quds Brigade operating in Iraq. The al-Quds Brigade is active in arming, training and funding militant movements, such as Lebanon's Hezbollah, throughout the Middle East.
"Throughout Iraq, operations are currently ongoing against individuals suspected of being closely tied to activities targeting Iraqi and Coalition forces," the headquarters of the U.S.-led Multinational Force said yesterday.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Well, maybe this is it. I have heard people say over and over again that the U.S. is going to be going to war with Iran. So maybe all the predictions are finely come true. I remember people saying the Iran is supporting the violence in Iraq. I figured they were probably right. However I was always under the impression that the violence they were supporting was toward the U.S., not Iraq citizens. Also look at what Hezbollah has become. The political party holds many seats in Lebonans government, and it is controled supplied by Iran. So will Iraq become another Lebanon? I fear the out come will be much worse.
Related News Links:
www.kansascity.com
www.latimes.com
www.chicagotribune.com
Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Middle East See Little Hope In Palestinian
The Nightmare And The Path To The Terror Atacks
Bigger war coming.......
[edit on 14-1-2007 by UM_Gazz]
Originally posted by missed_gear
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Second…in 1993, US forces were in Somalia to help the humanitarian aid flow the UN was attempting to deliver. US forces were deployed with the blessing of the UN to open the closed supply routes, get relief moving again and clear a way for the UN peacekeeping mission UNISOM II…never was the US mandate to enact regime change or disarm the nation. Yet, even these types of humanitarian missions have risks…yes?
Clinton’s administration allowed Somalia to somewhat languish and AQ was blamed for training the Somali’s which committed a majority of the acts against US forces…not a governmental body (if there even was one at that time)...
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So you like imperialism?
Please…Iran is guilty of imperialism.
Furthermore, Iran was involved in these types of organizations long before OIF. Iran’s actions can not be so simply justified by only pointing the finger at the US nor are Iran’s actions that of a solely peace seeking nation.
Mg
Actually, oil is what attracted George Herbert Bush to Somalia's plight. Why should a rich oilman be interested in caring about one hungry African nation when there are dozens more nearby? But you see, that one hungry nation has something that Herbert Bush wanted for his Big Oil buddies. OIL. That's the reason for the bloody US invasion of Somalia in 1993.
What's left out of your altruistic view of US foreign policy regarding Somalia is how oil companies also helped the G.I. Joes do their thing!
www.netnomad.com...
It is just pretty funny in a sad way that the type of mainstream reporting on Somalia ala Mark Fineman's got muted afterward.
And where has Iran's recent imperialism been compared to the USA's historical invasions and/or covert bloodshed in many places from Panama, the Philippines, Grenada, Guatemala, Iraq, Nicaragua, Chile and so forth?
[edit on 18-1-2007 by worldlyman]
Originally posted by littlebird
oh please vitchello and all others, this is all about power, money and control of oil rights to the nations. who gets what and how much and who buys or sells oil at different prices.
Actually, oil is what attracted George Herbert Bush to Somalia's plight. Why should a rich oilman be interested in caring about one hungry African nation when there are dozens more nearby?
The number of United States forces were expected to build to approximately 28,000 personnel, to be augmented by some 17,000 UNITAF troops from over 20 countries. In addition to United States forces, UNITAF included military units from Australia, Belgium, Botswana, Canada, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and Zimbabwe.Source
Originally posted by ZEV93
You can discuss if its justified or not, fact is Achmadinedschahd has threatend numerous times to "Wipe Israel off the Map". Hitler laid out his plans in advance in "Mein Kampf", noone took it seriously until it was too late.
Originally posted by RedGolem
Originally posted by ZEV93
You can discuss if its justified or not, fact is Achmadinedschahd has threatend numerous times to "Wipe Israel off the Map". Hitler laid out his plans in advance in "Mein Kampf", noone took it seriously until it was too late.
zev,
for everything that you said I think that statment I quoted above says the most.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
It's also best to question all propaganda designed to foment hate that builds the military-industrial complex and destroys more Earth.... before becoming a stooge of it:
"So who currently is more apt to bomb a country's infratructure, invade it, kill off its leaders and set up a puppet regime in order to benefit itself and make some quick profits?"
Originally posted by Infoholic
I'm confused as to where you stand?
Originally posted by Regenmacher
So to answer what side I stand on is to ask: What benefits are there in the further destructon of Earth, when we are all confined to a single planet? I see few benefits, unless extinction is the primary goal.
Originally posted by Realtruth
That is your first mistake being rational, logical and having a sense of responsiblity, there are people in control right now that have a biblical agenda to fulfill if you understand what I am talking about.
Is religion logical? I don't think you can explain faith with logic, you either have it or you don't.
Originally posted by Realtruth
Is religion logical? I don't think you can explain faith with logic, you either have it or you don't.
I said, "Are we still going to invade Iraq?" "Yes, Sir," he said, "but it's worse than that." I said, "How do you mean?" He held up this piece of paper. He said, "I just got this memo today or yesterday from the office of the Secretary of Defense upstairs. It's a, it's a five-year plan. We're going to take down seven countries in five years. We're going to start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan, we're going to come back and get Iran in five years. I said, "Is that classified, that paper?" He said, "Yes Sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me, because I want to be able to talk about it." Gen. Wesley Clark