It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skitzo
im going to need some help explaining this to the old lady so could you guys hype this back up please
Originally posted by soficrow
True, small quakes are quite common.
Today had a few larger than normal quakes - but that too, is not uncommon.
The number of actively erupting volcanoes seemed large though, as did the incidences of gases escaping from vents.
Here's something that coincidentally(?) just appeared:
Mining Caused Major Earthquake
Mining significantly changed the stress field in the earth's upper crust, reactivated a major fault beneath Newcastle's coalfields, and triggered an earthquake that killed 13 people in 1989 causing billions of dollars in damage
Originally posted by sensfan
Originally posted by soficrow
Here's something that coincidentally(?) just appeared:
Mining Caused Major Earthquake
Just appeared, yes, but happened quite a while ago.
Originally posted by soficrow
Originally posted by sensfan
Originally posted by soficrow
Here's something that coincidentally(?) just appeared:
Mining Caused Major Earthquake
Just appeared, yes, but happened quite a while ago.
Erm.
Point being: Human activities like mining, constructing dams and reservoirs, and oil and gas drilling ALL can cause large eathquakes.
...And those human activities continue.
Ergo - their effects continue.
.
Originally posted by sensfan
...We've been wrecking the earth for decades, and now we're starting to feel the effects of it. Just look at the large junk of ice shelf that broke of in the Canadian North...just a small sample of what's to come.
Sigh.
Originally posted by Duby78
You might take a look at this... I think they're wrong, it seems impossible!!!
RSOE Havaria
Originally posted by merky
...if this starts working up the west coast of USA....watch out.
By similar reasoning, ground motions large enough to alarm the general population (intensity >/= V) occurred over an area of 2,500,000 square km. Except for later shocks of the 1811-1812 sequence, no earthquakes in the recorded history of the United States have had a damage or felt area anywhere approaching this size. For example, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake had an area with intensity >/= VII of about 30,000 square km, and with intensity >/= V of about 150,000 square km (Lawson, 1908). On a global scale, the only other seismic region which is notable for such anomalously large damage and felt areas is the subcontinent of India. For example, the three great Indian earthquakes of June 16, 1819, June 12, 1897 and January 15, 1934 had comparable damage and felt areas (Richter, 1958; Davison, 1936).
Originally posted by thehumbleone
when do you think the San andreas fault line will give? i predict it might happen this year, it's long overdue, hope it doesn't happen though.
Originally posted by tribaltrip
Remember remember the 8 of January,
Doesnt sound as cool, oh well.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
I know whats going on. Its Elvis's birthday and mother nature is excited.