posted on Jun, 18 2007 @ 09:04 AM
I do not recall anyone ever debunking this particular photo, but given the source, its a hard pill to swallow even though it seems to look
genuine.
I still havent seen this photo debunked. I cannot find the duplicated image anywhere...anyone?
SIDE NOTE:Although the utterly, putrid,
OBVIOUS duplication of a book cover and trying to pass off such as a "real" pic totally sheds
any bit of credibilty for me personally (and should any rational thinking individual) I
still am perplexed at the absence of a verifiable
original painting or rendering of the dino depicted in this
alleged photo.
Any researchers out there up to the task? I invite you to find this and put this whole silly business to rest...happy hunting and good luck!
[edit on 18-6-2007 by 1nL1ghtened]