It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Officials say a stubbon landfill fire is out after buring for two weeks.
The city initially planned to let the fire burn itself out, but started using a chemical late in the week to put out the flames.
Originally posted by bsbray11
From your link:
Officials say a stubbon landfill fire is out after buring for two weeks.
The city initially planned to let the fire burn itself out, but started using a chemical late in the week to put out the flames.
I suppose a fire could burn indefinitely if you let it, huh?
Any molten iron/steel to be reported?
Originally posted by crowpruitt
I believe alot of the firefighters jobs were threatened after 9/11 if they didn't
"play along".But hey ,this is just my opinion.
Originally posted by untouchable
My entire family consists of firefighters. So I asked them what they thought of this entire situation and what would cause a thermal hotspot for a hundred days or more. They ALL said that it had to be some type of fuel that was attached to the steel columns of the building which collapsed into the center. They also said that there are only two types of fuel known to man that could cause these types of temperatures. They are Thermite and Thermate.
I did some further research to back up the Thermite and Thermate conjecture.It turns out that several scientists have examined steel debris from Ground Zero and have proven conclusively that Thermate was used to cut the steel beams. Please look this up.
And do you know that most firefighters in Canada won't even talk about 9/11 because they are afraid of reprisals by the American government. Sickening
Originally posted by bsbray11
From your link:
Officials say a stubbon landfill fire is out after buring for two weeks.
The city initially planned to let the fire burn itself out, but started using a chemical late in the week to put out the flames.
I suppose a fire could burn indefinitely if you let it, huh?
Any molten iron/steel to be reported?
The mechanics of spontaneous combustion in refuse are not well understood. Wood starts to burn with open flame once temperatures rise above 315 degrees C. Pyrolysis, the process of chemical oxidation of wood, can start at temperatures of 95 degrees C.. The reaction reaches an exothermic (heat producing) and self-sustaining state at temperatures as low as 149 degrees C. Temperatures approaching the 149 degrees ignition point are seldom reached in properly operated landfills where refuse decomposition is occurring under anaerobic conditions. Anaerobic bacteria thrive at temperatures that seldom exceed 60 degrees C. Aerobic bacteria generally thrive at temperatures below 75 degrees C. and typically die was the temperatures climb above 80 degrees C.
www.landfillfire.com...
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Problem is at a landfill you have alot of material to burn, what was at the WTC to burn but hundreds of tons of steel. If you believe the official story the insulation on the steel was mostly burned off in the initail explosion.
Their were several reports by demo and excavation teams of molten steel in several of WTC bulding basements.
"The debris pile acted like a chemical factory. It cooked together the components of the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least six weeks."
When the trade center towers burned and collapsed, tons of concrete, glass, furniture, carpets, insulation, computers and paper were reduced to enormous, oxygen-poor debris piles that slowly burned until Dec. 19, 2001.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
what was at the WTC to burn but hundreds of tons of steel. If you believe the official story the insulation on the steel was mostly burned off in the initail explosion.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Problem is at a landfill you have alot of material to burn, what was at the WTC to burn but hundreds of tons of steel.
If you believe the official story the insulation on the steel was mostly burned off in the initail explosion.
Their were several reports by demo and excavation teams of molten steel in several of WTC bulding basements.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Officials say a stubbon landfill fire is out after buring for two weeks.
The city initially planned to let the fire burn itself out, but started using a chemical late in the week to put out the flames.
I suppose a fire could burn indefinitely if you let it, huh?
Any molten iron/steel to be reported?
Originally posted by the smoking beagle
I was under the impression that they were office buildings which contained furniture, carpets, computers etc etc. Would non of that burn?
The fact that fires burn underground is well known.
What I'm trying to say is, that if you have fuel and oxygen then fires will continue to burn underground. Its not that unusual.
cheers
beagle
[edit on 6-1-2007 by the smoking beagle]
[edit on 6-1-2007 by the smoking beagle]
[edit on 6-1-2007 by the smoking beagle]
You have two 110 story office buildings.
You don't find a desk.
You don't find a chair.
You don't find a telephone, a computer.
The biggest piece of a telephone I found was half of a keypad,
and it was about this big:
(makes a shape with his hand about 4 inches in diameter)
The building collapsed to dust.
Any molten iron/steel to be reported?
ok , what , according to you sustained combustion ?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But didn't the official story say that the furniture and carpet was burned up on several floors in the first hour from jet fuel ? Our are you questioning the official story too ?
So your trying to tell me that fire burned over 1500 degrees according to 1 fire chief from just some carpetting and furniture, and maybe you can explain how air get in under tons of debris to fuel the fire for several weeks.
Originally posted by the smoking beagle
so what happened to the cars in the garages?
Theres fuel in the tank, upholstery, carpet, plastic dashboard, tyres etc. All a bit flammable really.
But you say they werent there
So according to you the two WTC towers contained NO office furniture, fittings or equipment.
The smoke is coming from a "fuel rich" coal fire, but the smoke is white.
Odd eh?
Youve certainly got me thinking about the debris fires.
No fuel, no oxygen supply.
No normal explanation for a fire then?
Originally posted by the smoking beagle
In it, its said that the fires had a 17 day head start because, the authorities wanted to mke sure they got any survivors out before they started flooding the site with water.
The other thing thats mentioned is the idea of flooding the site with inert gas, to starve the fires of oxygen. This is thought not to be practical because the debris are said to be too large and porus.
So if inert gas wont stay in the debris and will leak out, then it seems logical to assume oxygen can enter the debris.
Or maybe you disagree?
Do you surmise that all the air was expelled from the rubble by the collapse and therefore combustion could only be sustained by the addition of an oxydizing agent?
Could this oxidizing agent be the iron oxide present in thermite?
From what I can see the debris at GZ were a sodding great heap of rubbish that was burning quite well on its own.
Now Ive put forward my view on the debris fire, whats yours?
All the best
Beagle
Would this explain the bone fragments found on rooftops,or the steel beams sticking out of neighboring buildings?Alot of bodies were never recovered from the WTC sites because there was none,just body parts.How can this be if the buildings just fell from weakened steel trusses.
Originally posted by the smoking beagle
Hi there BSBray,thanks for taking the time out to make a comprehensive reply.
Not sure if I'm included as one of your "word spitters", I'll just check.
No, the key board seems pretty dry this end
You say that there was nothing in the basement of the WTC,
"except below ground, where I think there was a good amount of gravel (from concrete) and larger piece of unbroken concrete in certain places."
so what happened to the cars in the garages?
Last time I looked cars seemed to burn quite well.
Theres fuel in the tank, upholstery, carpet, plastic dashboard, tyres etc. All a bit flammable really.
But you say they werent there, so they couldnt have been fuel for the debris fires then.
Now then you also state
" the towers were made of 110 stories each and only about 3 or 4 MAX had any appreciable fire on them, and I'm being generous. 3 or 4 from 110 is not 75, though it doesn't really matter, because I see no floors' worth of furniture or etc., and never have, in any GZ photos. "
So according to you the two WTC towers contained NO office furniture, fittings or equipment.
What were all those people doing there every day?
Couldnt have been working, 'cos theres nothing to work with.
Its a bit of mystery why they turned up day after day to empty offices, not even a water cooler to stand around.
It must have been very boring.
Never mind theres always the spectacular views of Manhatten, or travelling up and down all day in the lifts.
Any way, NO office furniture means NO fuel for the debris fires then.
So thats alright then.
Now, onto the smoke. You say:
"Masses of fuel, when burned, are called fuel-rich fires. They produce black, sooty smoke, because the burn is inefficient, not all the fuel is consumed before it can combust, and unconsumed hydrocarbons or etc. escape in the smoke. This is what happens when you really have huge masses of fuel that are on fire. They don't just smolder and smolder and smolder for months, putting off an oddly white smoke."
Have a look at these pictures of an underground fire at Centalia PA
Centralia, no smoke without fire !
The smoke is coming from a "fuel rich" coal fire, but the smoke is white.
Odd eh?
Its been smouldering for 40 years.
You appear to be a bit of an expert on smoke and fires, whats the explanation ?
Youve certainly got me thinking about the debris fires.
No fuel, no oxygen supply.
No normal explanation for a fire then?
Whats the answer?
Look forward to your reply.
All the best
Beagle
Pip Pip!!!
Would this explain the bone fragments found on rooftops,or the steel beams sticking out of neighboring buildings?Alot of bodies were never recovered from the WTC sites because there was none,just body parts.How can this be if the buildings just fell from weakened steel trusses.
Originally posted by crowpruitt
Originally posted by CameronFox
Alot of bodies were never recovered from the WTC sites because there was none,just body parts.
How can this be if the buildings just fell from weakened steel trusses.
I never said they were in on it,I meerly stated I believed their jobs may have been threatened if they didn't support the official story that is all.Don't you think the government is capable of something like this?
And you still believe the FDNY was in on it?