It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byrd
The Sitchin story is cute and interesting
you're not very nice, sometimes
Originally posted by Marduk
I would do anything to take a trip back in time and see what really happend.
from what you just said you'd be extremely dissapointed that your imagination doesn't match the reality
can you give me a link to a good example of this egyptian sacrifice for the mythical gods that you speak of ?
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
Originally posted by Byrd
The Sitchin story is cute and interesting
I've got to disagree with you there Byrd, though I suspect you are being intentionally generous.
Sitchin writes 4th rate sci-fi which can't hold my attention for more than 10 minutes. If you guys want to read some spine tinglingly good Space Opera then get hold of Iain M Banks or Alastair Reynolds (I'm just reading his Century Rain at the mo, for a little holiday treat). These authors also have the advantage of not pretending that their stories are actually real. They are also a million times more sophisticated than anything that hack Sitchin could ever dream up.
Thanks Undo and militia, for your interesting thoughts on Sumerian origins.
1. You continued with your insults at following members again with total disregard and contempt to moderators
2. You continue to persist in claiming others' views are 'crap', fiction, etc, and yet..are you yourself an 'expert' on Sumerian history, culture, science and knowledge? (Desist using googled fu to back you up please!)
3. A civilisation such as Sumeria encompasses a landmass almost the whole of modern arab world. And yet, with a few hundred archeological holes in the ground, are we to accept the so-called 'experts' opinion based on a few broken chips or works of art as holy writ?
( try IMAGINE a dig around a kansas farm after a post apocalyptic event in an imaginary future, with sand or earth that covered the whole of USA for 4000 years, dug by an ignorant surviving race - would their 'facts' be that 4000 years ago after the apocalyptic event, the US civilisation were a bunch of farmers? Will they dig up every square inch of USA? How much of a civilisation's non-stone artefact will remain intact after 4000 yrs? So how much would be fact and how much would be conjecture of a civilisation? )
4. Who is more ignorant - the one who questions the 'expert' or the one who does not question but accepts 'experts' opinion on blind faith?
Take note: History is not science. Science is based on theories that can be repeated with similar results and are thus facts. History is only interpretation of events by fallible men, from the recorder to the archeologist.
I am only going to speak up for UNDO. I went back and reread her post in this thread. No where does she claim that what she is saying it is fact
Originally posted by Marduk
[edit on 3-1-2007 by Marduk]