It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Really? Sounds like its pretty much a done deal.
"Muslim delegates at a conference in Etobicoke, Ont., in October elected a 30-member council to establish the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice.
The institute is classified in Islamic law as a Darul-Qada, or judicial tribunal. Its bylaws are scheduled to be drafted and approved by Dec. 31. "
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Would it be possible that I send my ex-wife up there for about a month? She shouldn't need any longer than that to get a rock concert thrown on her behalf!
Originally posted by dexxy
That will never happen, this is just a bunch of bs.
They only want to implement by-laws, which are subordinate to federal law.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Would it be possible that I send my ex-wife up there for about a month? She shouldn't need any longer than that to get a rock concert thrown on her behalf!
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
They only want to implement by-laws, which are subordinate to federal law.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Would it be possible that I send my ex-wife up there for about a month? She shouldn't need any longer than that to get a rock concert thrown on her behalf!
It's only a tribunal, which doesn't have final authority. If Islamic people in Canada want to implement this tribunal, then, they can, just as long it's Constitutionally viable.
This action by Canadian law society show the world that we are a truly free country.!
Originally posted by dexxy
That will never happen, this is just a bunch of bs.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Really? Sounds like its pretty much a done deal.
"Muslim delegates at a conference in Etobicoke, Ont., in October elected a 30-member council to establish the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice.
The institute is classified in Islamic law as a Darul-Qada, or judicial tribunal. Its bylaws are scheduled to be drafted and approved by Dec. 31. "
The point is that we have multi-culturalism inscribed into our constitution, so the canadian gov. lives up to it. It's kind of amazing the there is a country like canada in this world, like a revolutionary one.
Originally posted by Dreamz
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
They only want to implement by-laws, which are subordinate to federal law.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Would it be possible that I send my ex-wife up there for about a month? She shouldn't need any longer than that to get a rock concert thrown on her behalf!
It's only a tribunal, which doesn't have final authority. If Islamic people in Canada want to implement this tribunal, then, they can, just as long it's Constitutionally viable.
This action by Canadian law society show the world that we are a truly free country.!
i dont see what freedom has to do with this, it just proves to me what I suspected all along. Canadians are off their rockers.
No seriously, I don't know much about Canadian government, but whast the point in implementing this if they don't have final authority. Is it just like the Queen, all for show. Either way, it seems kinda BS to me.
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
The point is that we have multi-culturalism inscribed into our constitution, so the canadian gov. lives up to it. It's kind of amazing the there is a country like canada in this world, like a revolutionary one.
Originally posted by Dreamz
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
They only want to implement by-laws, which are subordinate to federal law.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Would it be possible that I send my ex-wife up there for about a month? She shouldn't need any longer than that to get a rock concert thrown on her behalf!
It's only a tribunal, which doesn't have final authority. If Islamic people in Canada want to implement this tribunal, then, they can, just as long it's Constitutionally viable.
This action by Canadian law society show the world that we are a truly free country.!
i dont see what freedom has to do with this, it just proves to me what I suspected all along. Canadians are off their rockers.
No seriously, I don't know much about Canadian government, but whast the point in implementing this if they don't have final authority. Is it just like the Queen, all for show. Either way, it seems kinda BS to me.
Originally posted by Salem
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Their's nothing in our constitution wich stipule that you have the right to do that, I'm far to be racist, but I'm better not seeing any asshole to throw rocks at a woman or I'm going to kick their ass.
I don't where you take your info Ol'tom but you should check out your sources.
That's just morally disgusting.
[Edited on 29-11-2003 by Salem]
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Originally posted by Salem
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
So, your constitution will have no problem with stoning adulterers?
Their's nothing in our constitution wich stipule that you have the right to do that, I'm far to be racist, but I'm better not seeing any asshole to throw rocks at a woman or I'm going to kick their ass.
I don't where you take your info Ol'tom but you should check out your sources.
That's just morally disgusting.
[Edited on 29-11-2003 by Salem]
What, did you not see the rest of the story? Did you comment without clicking through? Do you usually ask questions when the answer has already been afforded?
BTW, who are you to go and interrupt someone else's beliefs in morality by interjecting your own? Kind of goes against multiculturalism, doesn't it?