It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Not sure what is wrong with the "children of today", but I know one thing. If they were drafted (given legal age), they would sure as hell have their acts cleaned up.
Yes, turning people into trained attack dogs for the power elite is very character-forming.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Yes. Why should I lie for a reason as trivial as making a point on an Internet message board?
I have a life, as it happens. One -- as it happens -- that is under constant and daily threat from uniformed men with guns.
The US won the Cold War by outspending the Soviet Union in an arms race at a time when the latter's grip on its empire was being challenged from within. Your military didn't win the Cold War. Your economy did.
And -- possibly unlike you -- I am old enough to remember the Cold War and the terror it inspired in ordinary people living under the shadow of the Bomb.
The policy of deterrence you tout brought the world to the very brink of nuclear war over and over again.
In your own words, pick up a book, friend. A psychology textbook.
Originally posted by llpoolej
What has happened? The schools are castrated in being able to kick out kids who are bad, violent, disrespectful or disruptive. Parents no longer parent. They expect the schools to handle it, which, they can't
Originally posted by llpoolej
The bad ones just ruin it for everyone else
Originally posted by llpoolej
I have worked in a Jr High school. I worked in the Resource dept. There was one boy, at age 13 that was 6ft tall and very violent. When he slept at his desk, he was left to sleep. I was instructed to leave him to sleep. That is a child that SHOULD not be in a regular school. That is a bad kid. That is the kind that keeps the ones trying to learn, needing the extra help in resource from getting it.
Originally posted by llpoolej
Teachers do reward positive behavior. But, ignoring the bad behavior doesn't extinguish it. No matter how hard you want to believe so.
Originally posted by llpoolej
I grew up in the 70's/80's. We had a paddling was part of discipline. No one was abused. They were paddled. Parents were aware of it and they were punished when they got home too. You know, there wasn't back talking, disrespect, threats of STUDENT violence(in jr high) as I saw where the school has no rights
Originally posted by llpoolej
The ones who don't usually have the kids who are misbehaving in class. I am a parent. I am on the PTA board. I am very involved with my kids and at school. My kids are in grade school and they go to a very good school.
Originally posted by llpoolej
I have a friend who worked at an at risk elementary school and was going to have her masters repaid if she stayed there 3 years. The kids and parents were so bad, she chose not to. It was that bad. Parents totally uninvolved and kids completely out of control at the GRADE school level.
Originally posted by llpoolej
Parents make or break a school. It isn't about money being given to the schools, but, how involved the parents are and how they raise their kids. In my state, funds are distributed evenly across the state. Not to the individual areas.
Originally posted by llpoolej
Parents are what make children what they are.
Originally posted by snafu7700
why dont you ask the admin how many hoaxers they have each month?
And -- possibly unlike you -- I am old enough to remember the Cold War...
possibly not. dont make assumptions....you'll find that you make an ass out of yourself by assuming too much.
i'd rather educate myself by reading a history book than psycho-babble... if you try that yourself, you might actually become educated as to the benifits of said military.
Originally posted by Mechanic 32
I was prompted to start this thread, in response to this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
regarding a bill that was introduced that would allow teachers to to carry concealed weapons into the classroom.
To me, there is no valid argument for that. In fact time and money would be better off spent in investigating what would motivate a child to obtain a firearm to do harm to others, or to his or her self in the first place?
It would seem that there are many factors involved including, the education system, the childs upbringing (did they come from an abusive family), violence on television in movies and in videogames.
With many of todays youth growing up essentially with one parent, it becomes increasingly harder for that parent to monitor their childrens activities, physical and mental well being, etc., etc. Even to the point that the parent may only see this child basically on the weekends only.
This is a sad state of affairs for the youth of today.