It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jbondo
Originally posted by Fiverz
You forget though that 9/11 didn't have the religious implications that a nationally-televised UFO event would have. You pretty much pull the rug out from under 84% of the world's population with a UFO attack.
I'm so tired of this one!
I happen to be a faithful Christian and I see no reason why other lifeforms can't exist in the universe.
Originally posted by sergejsh
Are ou sure that inside airplane, which is landing or descending (moving fast), water drops on the window will behave the same way as on the static ground, i.e. on your appartment window?
Originally posted by robertfenix
I flew from ORD on 11/15/2006 United 668 to New York, left from C gates (15 I think)
It had been really mild here, not even a hard cold snap yet, there was still a lot of green trees from what I remember on the whole drive up and in the Joliet area as well. As well as on 294 before the 190.
We did not get that big blast of snow until Thanksgiving, but prior to that it had been really mild.
Annuals had turned to gold and amber colors in mid Oct around 15th or so. But there are some evergreens that are still green even today 1/26/07.
Originally posted by Realtruth
What happens when UFO's become identified?
What will everyone call them IFO's? Identified Flying Objects.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by SkyWay
It is compared to Chicago. And if anyone is going to devote any time to a place the size of a Chicago suburb then it merits at least as much attention when a ufo appears over a great metro area like Chicago at an airport that is crowded with air-traffic landing and taking off.
Well, not to be off topic, but a city of over one million is a remote farm compared to a city of two million? Not to mention sightings were reported throughout the state....
Originally posted by Crakeur
it was actually decided several years ago at a very high level clearance meeting that, in the event of UFO's being identified, they would, from that point on, be known as George.
I spoke to some friends after making the claim that there was a significant military presence during that sighting. ...
Something happened that day that I am sure of and whatever it was that people saw the military had concerns.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Actually the population of Chicago is closer to 3 million. But to get back on topic, it really warrants painstaking investigation when anything unknown appears in the sky over one of the most congested airports in the world such as O'hare. This is an area where millions of airpassengers are coming and going everyday and if for no other reason, alien visitors aside for the moment, anything occupying air space over O'hare needs to be dealt with so as to try to prevent endangering the lives of so many people.
Originally posted by Fiverz
Originally posted by Dr Love
Originally posted by Fiverz
While it's probably POSSIBLE for a water drop to be at a wierd angle like that, I am now leaning away from the water drop theory.
Forgive me for the schleppy arrows. Not only is it "probably possible", it's highly probable.
There is something going on here and ATS's "professionals" are in on it. Is this some kind of test or something?
Peace
I was gonna post that image rotated 8 to 10 degrees to show you that it does make a difference ... but ... it doesn't haha. Most of the drops actually still look parallel to the ground when rotated by that small of an angle. Well I thought I had ruled something out, now I'm back to the very beginning of the thread and having no idea what I'm looking at. Well at least lots of ads got viewed while I was reading all 55 pages here, eh
Like I mentioned previously, along with others, the only way that we are gonna get any resolution on this is for the eyewitnesses to actually step forward, give us their names so we can verify that they are genuine, and have them pass judgement. We can talk about water drops and photoshops until we're blue in the face but we're not gonna get any definitive conclusion without that firsthand testimony.
EDIT: oh yea yesterday was my one-year ATS-joining anniversary! go me!
[edit on 26-1-2007 by Fiverz]
Originally posted by jritzmann
If it's a "raindrop" why is there only one? How many times you seen a raindrop on your windshield...alot right? How many times ya seen just one?
The reason I stick with it is that shape matches reports of how it looked.
IF this shot is so damned fake
Originally posted by sergejsh
I don't think this photo is fake. It is not fake, but probably original photo, with no graphical manipulations. This is just airport photo taken through the airplane window. I also like to do such photos. That's it. And suddenly photographer noticed "something" in the corner. Hmmm... maybe this is IT? But problem is - photo appears to be taken in different than Gate C17 direction.
Photographer heard about "O'Hare UFO case" and, why not, there is something in the corner of he's photo! Wow! He probably emotionally reacted to this (as almost all people here) and believed that it can be that UFO! Why not? But who knows? Let's try to give it to the people from forum and we will see what happens.
[edit on 26-1-2007 by sergejsh]
Originally posted by sergejsh
Or it can be drop after somebody's sneezeng. You name it.
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Anyone else have any serious possibilities that can be discounted as inprobable?
Originally posted by Jbird
Originally posted by Crakeur
Is it not odd that the reporter who broke the story, and then did a round of interviews has been silent for so long?
'vacation' could just be a cover story?
possible reasons why the reporter would
drop out of sight.
- waiting for further contact/info
- book deal with the witness/es
- further investigations(unfettered/'undercover')
- editors order
- writing 'scoop' piece for his paper
and
- Gov. involvement
Originally posted by SkyWay
So money is not really a serious factor here. Besides, not everyone is motivated by money.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by SkyWay
So money is not really a serious factor here. Besides, not everyone is motivated by money.
And you're just speculating on how much money one could get, sure the photo we have here wouldn't be worth squat, but if somebody had something real solid, you have NO idea how much one could make....
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
This might be radical thinking.. but instead of trying to prove what it is how about we try to eliminate what it isn't?
Can we eliminate all known aircraft/weather ballons?
Can we eliminate all types of known birds or insects?
Can we eliminate the water drop theory?
Can we eliminate it being a hoax created with the other image?
Can we eliminate it being an alien spacecraft?
Can we eliminate it being an experimental aircraft that conforms to any known experimental designs?