It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
911 Commision, FEMA, NIST,etc. We have found that most of these agencies of the government were not perfect in thier investigations. (911 Commision was FAR from perfect)
I have read literaly hundreds of posts on this site alone, other CT blog sites, and 911 Conspiracy sites. I have also read the other sites in support of the "offical story". I can not find one shred of evidence that supports the "Controlled Demolition" theory.
Originally posted by CameronFox
There is an abundance of holes in the C.D> Theory.
1- Seismic Activity/ There was ZERO evidence to support a C.D. In fact there were several "Field Seismographs" in the area of 911 and ALL of them are consistent in their findings, providing a scientific conclusion of each of the three events.
Originally posted by CameronFox
2- People often say in here "it looked like a controlled demolition". Well, controlled demolitions require to concentrate their efforts to the lowest floors of a structure. Yes you do place charges on upper floors to facilitate breakage, maximizing control as the structure collapses...EVERY implosion ever performed follows the same rule of thumb. Take out the structural supports from the bottom floors. This "Gets the structure moving". The Twin towers were clearly collapsing were the planes struck.
Originally posted by CameronFox
3- Now I wll hear the cutting charge...or pre burning. You will need access to all these areas to cause this. We all know the time and man power to do this. The "planners" of this CD would not have the exact location of the damage the plane would cause..so they would have to hit SEVERAL FLOORS.
4- Squibs..EVERY expert has come out to agree these are not FLUMES or Squibs, but air, dust and debris. Claims that the air would follow JUST THE CORE are not accurate. The air being pushed downward would force it through the path of least resistance. Please look at the squibs in all the videos, tell me if you notice ANY failure on those floors. Isnt that their purpose? To help it along? ALSO..if your looking to use a detonation powerful enough to defeat steel columns, this would have been detected by any seismograph. Detailed analysis of ALL data has shown ZERO abnormal vibration events.
5- Molten Steel burning for days? I have to admit there were some great photos. Truth is, we dont know if it was steel. there have been interviews done by investigators that have said that if it were STEEL that was melting like that, it would have destroyed the hydrolic systems on their equipment as they removed the rubble.
Originally posted by CameronFox
6- What about Dr. Jones? The tests he did? He admits that his theory is still in its research phase . Lets think for a minute.Is there anyway someone could predict the destructive process that thermate takes on to destroy all the beams at the same time? Getting the same results? He did the tests from a memorial of the WTC. How were these beams cut? Maybe with torches, or other materials that may cause false readings?
1- Seismic Activity/ There was ZERO evidence to support a C.D. In fact there were several "Field Seismographs" in the area of 911 and ALL of them are consistent in their findings, providing a scientific conclusion of each of the three events.
Originally posted by CameronFox
3- Now I wll hear the cutting charge...or pre burning. You will need access to all these areas to cause this. We all know the time and man power to do this. The "planners" of this CD would not have the exact location of the damage the plane would cause..so they would have to hit SEVERAL FLOORS.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
So tell me, when was the last time ever in human history has a HIGHRISE ever fell due to some fire..
Remember boys and girls, steel weakens at 2500+f not 500F or as jet fuels are concerned 600+
Ever see how fast Steel melts with thermite?
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I think you might want to look at these links.
The bridge was a gasoline fire and gasoline has a lot less heat energy than Jet fuel.
Burned Bridge
Fire Could Easily Have Been Cause of WTC Collapse
As far as thermite is concerned, how do you keep it in contact with an I-beam long enough for it to melt through it? Your video was pretty, but how much structural damage was done to the car? It was the gasoline left in the fuel tank that destroyed the car. All the thermite did was to burn a small hole through it. If it was used on an I-beam it would burn a hole through the flange, leaving the web intact.
Originally posted by CameronFox
BSBRAY -
I looked at the link you attached. Thank you. Yes, if his data is correct (and i have no reason to think otherwise) Then there in deed was a 14 second difference in the time the FAA lost the flights on radar and the Seismic data. I believe this may have been the time it took for the destruction of the transponder. I dont claim to be a scientist..or work for Boeing..etc...
the person on this "paper" claimed that a plane traveling at 500 MPH slamming into a sky scraper would not offer any seismic activity. So the only seismic activity was from an alleged "BOMB" in the basement of the twin towers. The impact of the planes did NOT register any seismic activity?
Originally posted by CameronFox
However, bombs, if detonated underground, would have generated strong P waves in addition to S waves.
The Theories that basement bombs were the cause of the collapse of the Towers are contradicted by Ladder Company 6 who survived the collapse of the WTC.
www.acfd.com...
Thats an interview with 7 Firefighters with Stone Philips of Dateline NBC.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
So tell me, when was the last time ever in human history has a HIGHRISE ever fell due to some fire..
Remember boys and girls, steel weakens at 2500+f not 500F or as jet fuels are concerned 600+
Originally posted by doctorfungi
NIST did controlled tests using materials identical to those in the WTC's