Proof Of a Mine on Mars???

Originally posted by nataylor

Originally posted by SneakySquirrel
I checked your link and the only thing that strikes me as odd, is that there is a single block of nothingness directly above the picture. Is this just an ordinary thing? Or is it blocking something else? I'm curious and would really like to know.

The black area is a data transmission error. That's fairly common on data returned from any number of probes.

Ah, thank you for the clarification. For a moment, I didn't really know what that was, does anyone have a picture of the anomaly that doesn't have the 'data transmission error?' Just wondering.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by denythestatusquoThe grooves in the Martian crater are spiraling and the hole is a lot deeper vs its diameter.

I do not see any spiraling, and as we only have half of the "feature" there is no way of knowing if those markings are concentric or if they are spiraling.

The area around the concentric/spiraling marks also looks like the result of an impact, with some material projected to the outside of the impact area

Okay so I can't prove spiraling effect here without the other side so you both got me there so far. But if this is a crater impact then why so little debris then?

Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
And remember there are disinfo guys out there having a ruddy good laugh when they create this kinda stuff.

Now who are these so called 'disinfo guys' out there having a ruddy good laugh? NASA? CIA, NSA? DSA? KGB, Mossad? Did they purposely create this stuff, the photograph of the hole on Mars? For whom and why?

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
And remember there are disinfo guys out there having a ruddy good laugh when they create this kinda stuff.

Now who are these so called 'disinfo guys' out there having a ruddy good laugh? NASA? CIA, NSA? DSA? KGB, Mossad? Did they purposely create this stuff, the photograph of the hole on Mars? For whom and why?

I think that person means that they forgot to 'do' that one and now they regret it. In fact instead of laughing they may be crying.

Keep up the good work.

Here’s another photograph of another type of ‘mine’(?) on Mars, reproduced from another thread I posted. Notice the oddities in this one!

I have marked some of these areas in red and probable air brushing by NASA, in white. Notice the ‘structures’ and the ‘spray’. Needless to say, all this could be what we term as natural geological formations. It could also be a mining op!!


Courtesy: JP Skipper
Source: NASA-JPL-MSSS
MOC # M11-00009
Loc: Longitude 19.73W – Latitude 03.08
Scaled image Size: 2.91 km wide – 45 km Height



[edit on 25-11-2006 by mikesingh]

you cant determine what it is 100%. but it loos very intrigueing, could be natural but then again it looks not so natural in nature. interesting

Cool. Not a cowpie? Lets have a photo of Kennicott copper open mine in Utah for comparisons sake eh?

Originally posted by Black Sword
Cool. Not a cowpie? Lets have a photo of Kennicott copper open mine in Utah for comparisons sake eh?

Here..Couldn't get a better res pic!


Kennecott mines



And the one on Mars.

And with false color..



[edit on 26-11-2006 by mikesingh]

Originally posted by nataylor
FYI, more information and a wider view of the area here.

"Exhumed" appears to refer to a process of wind removing sediment from the crater. A Google search for "mars exhumed crater" turns up more information.

Thanks for providing a link to the best explanation I've read so far. An old impact crater that got filled with sediment. The sediment hardened into rock and then the wind? eroded the sediment away exposing layers of the impact crater. It makes the most sense to me especially due to the fact that I see no shadows. I would expect to see shadows of a mountain if it was a pic of a volcano or shadows in a pit if it was going down. Of course I wouldn't see any shadows if the sun was directly overhead.

As much as the idea of evidence of an old civilization or signs of life may be, I don't see it here.

That is spectacular, mikesingh! (been waiting and waiting to be able to use the word "spectacular", i hope i spelled it right. )


The resistance to this particular theory is really strong. I'ma thinkin' you are onto something big.

That's definitely not a meteor crater. Compare it to www.meteorite.com...
the arizona meteor crater.

And Tunguska
www.hydrogencommerce.com...

THIS is WIND / WATER erosion on Mars. Big difference from the "Exhumed" crater.
www.msss.com...





[edit on 26-11-2006 by undo]

To the gentleman who thought it necessary to suggest only lonely men without women are abducted and "probed", perhaps you'd like to prove your baseless assumption. If not, then why mention it? It's one of the most hateful remarks I've heard from another human being in a long time. That is, if you are human anymore.

Originally posted by undo
That's definitely not a meteor crater. Compare it to www.meteorite.com...
the arizona meteor crater.

Not all craters look like the Arizona meteor crater.

The shape of the crater is the result of many factors, that is why here on Earth, on the Moon or on Mars there are different types of craters.

Did you saw the satellite photo of that crater in Mauritania that I posted earlier?If you didn't then I post it again.

And Tunguska
www.hydrogencommerce.com...

I did not know that they had found any crater in Tunguska. In fact, the article with that photo to which you posted the link says "detonated in the atmosphere", it did not it the ground.

THIS is WIND / WATER erosion on Mars. Big difference from the "Exhumed" crater.
www.msss.com...

Nobody said that the crater was the result of erosion, on the contrary, the crater was most of the time covered with dust, and after being uncovered (or exhumed), it shows as much better preserved crater because it was not the victim of erosion.

I don't think it is a crater of any kind, there is very little shadow "inside" it, which would be expected unless enough light was shining directly onto it.
I think it looks like like a natural formation of some kind, possible raised up like a small mountain, with clear contours.

I'm still undicided to be honest, open to persuasion in either direction.

Larks

Mikesingh,

Have you got a direct link to the source image for the other alleged Mars mine photograph in your post? Thank you.

[edit on 26-11-2006 by Ross Cross]

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by T Trubballshoota
And remember there are disinfo guys out there having a ruddy good laugh when they create this kinda stuff.

Now who are these so called 'disinfo guys' out there having a ruddy good laugh? NASA? CIA, NSA? DSA? KGB, Mossad? Did they purposely create this stuff, the photograph of the hole on Mars? For whom and why?

My point is that you guys should be sure of the evidence before claiming its proof.
OK this thread is qualified by having a question mark.

Clawing through NASA or whoever's pix hoping to find evidence of Alien life past or present is madness I believe. You guys on one hand claim NASA are covering up "Oh look this is airbrushed" or whatever, then are using NASA's photo archive to look for it. Surely if they were covering up they would only release the pix that don't show anything? Is this fact too simple? Maybe I am the simple one.

Regarding disinfo guys who knows who they are, that's why they are disinfo guys.
I am not claiming this is their work. My point is the reaction to this thread by believers is a gift to such people. Maybe these images are created by disinfo guys wouldn't be hard for them would it? The reason? Well they would know but would they tell?

You guys are a gift to such people. How many kiddies must look on here and think how easily led and gullible the residents are? What an ideal place to start a rumour.

I am amused by comments here that there is "Resistance" to the thread and that means you are onto something big.

So if I get this right, the more someone proves this theory wrong the more correct the theory is??

Must quadruple the aluminium foil in my hat.....

Here's a photo of the Mauritania Crater. Notice that it is indeed a spiral.



Source:
www.raidaventura4x4.com...

in another article written on the topic of this particular crater, I found some very interesting info, which I will bold for you in the text:

"The Guelb er Richat is the largest guelb in Mauritania with a diameter of about 50 km. What has caused this circular depression in nature is uncertain. Some speculations say it is the remains of a grand meteorite impact, other speculations say it is caused by magmatic rise.
The dimensions of the guelb are so big that it is easily visible from space, and is sometimes called "The Eye of Africa".
Standing on ground, it is often quite possible lose the perspective of the dimensions. Its circular shape is slightly difficult to see, even if the sides of the guelb at many points stand as tall as 200 metres above the lowest points.
Today there are only few people living in the guelb, the exception is at the copper mine. But travelling around even the uninhabited areas, it is quite easy to spot traces of human activity going thousands of years back in time. Needles, fasteners and points of lances can be tracked down by visitors with time on their hands."

Source:
lexicorient.com...

Suffice it to say, there's every possibility this was indeed a strip mine a very long time ago. It certainly shouldn't be any less of a possiblity than the other speculation, that a crater 50 kilometers (please, consult your brain for this one) wide, was caused by a meteor impact that didn't destroy the planet or punch a hole clean through it.



[edit on 26-11-2006 by undo]

Originally posted by undo
To the gentleman who thought it necessary to suggest only lonely men without women are abducted and "probed", perhaps you'd like to prove your baseless assumption. If not, then why mention it? It's one of the most hateful remarks I've heard from another human being in a long time. That is, if you are human anymore.

Calling me a Gentleman comes close to being as hateful.
Personally I think the Wrexham girls comment was more hateful (they are easily pulled).

I did not mention abduction either. Perhaps you would want proof of the Martian Starship as well? I see nothing in my comment that indicates that the anal probing was limited to one group? I just mentioned one group.

My point was things the image could be. To be honest there is as much evidence to prove some of my list as there is evidence to prove its a mine.

Prove my baseless assumption? Where is the proof that Aliens are probing the backdoor of humans? This is as baseless is it not? Civilisations years in advance of ourselves travel all the way here, not to investigate the brain oh no to easy, lets interrogate their bottoms. Maybe because so may humans talk out of them...I know I do

Unfortunately I am still human. Anymore? You mean I don't have to be?
I must keep up the mind controlled DNA manipulation.

Anyway I am off to buy some KY just in case someone wants to probe me......

Originally posted by T Trubballshoota

Prove my baseless assumption? Where is the proof that Aliens are probing the backdoor of humans? This is as baseless is it not? Civilisations years in advance of ourselves travel all the way here, not to investigate the brain oh no to easy, lets interrogate their bottoms. Maybe because so may humans talk out of them...I know I

Not to go off topic, but the point of those abduction stories isn't just that they might probe orifices, but that they tend to treat this planet like a farm for breeding animals.

[edit on 26-11-2006 by undo]

Have I missed something??? Probing, abductions, Wrexham girls?? I live near Wrexham LOL I thought it was Essex girls we ad to watch....no just Kiddin!!!

Well the African whole is the most similer to the Mars hole, Very interesting subject!! It probably is due to weather and erosion without REAL proof it is hard to say.

Not as fascinating as the GLASS TUNNELS ON MARS!! But still pretty fab picture Good reasearch Well done everyone keep up the good work!!