It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
India and China (The Tiger and the Dragon) now possess the weight and dynamism to transform the 21st-century global economy. The closest parallel to their emergence is the saga of 19th-century America, a huge continental economy with a young, driven workforce that grabbed the lead in agriculture, apparel, and the high technologies of the era, such as steam engines, the telegraph, and electric lights.
But in a way, even America's rise falls short in comparison to what's happening now. Never has the world seen the simultaneous, sustained takeoffs of two nations that together account for one-third of the planet's population. For the past two decades, China has been growing at an astounding 9.5% a year, and India by 7-8%. Most economists figure China and India possess the fundamentals to keep growing in the 7%-to-8% range for decades. (America’s growth rate is approx 2%)
Originally posted by CAPT PROTON
The other thing is, developed countries like the US and Japan for instance are moving toward more robotic automation for their factories. Ever heard of the "Lights Out" style of manufacturing? Its a factory environment that runs 24/7 with little to no people doing any of the actual work.
Suddenly, there's a huge problem.
[edit on 21-11-2006 by CAPT PROTON]
Originally posted by CAPT PROTON
HAH! I doubt it. Until China and India create some world changing technologies like the steam engine, the telegraph, telephone, and electric lights, etc., they won't be considered too threatening.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I'm not sure I understand the thinking here. Because India and China are overpopulating the earth, that makes them potential superpowers? Seems like a mere biological function to me.
Have you seen some of those people? Look at the slums of Calcutta, for example. Millions teeming in abject poverty and filth, starving to death. That is progress?
And the days of military superiority being determined by sheer numbers is a thing of the past.
As far as progress, we have the world beat. We have so much food we throw it away. We excel in almost every technology known to man. We haven't just been riding the steam engines and communicating via telegraph for the past 150 years.
This is what we are to fear?
[edit on 23-11-2006 by jsobecky]
Originally posted by jsobecky
I notice you avoided my main question, but that's OK. Flattery will get you everywhere!
Originally posted by jsobecky
Have you seen some of those people? Look at the slums of Calcutta, for example. Millions teeming in abject poverty and filth, starving to death. That is progress?
And the days of military superiority being determined by sheer numbers is a thing of the past.
As far as progress, we have the world beat. We have so much food we throw it away.
We excel in almost every technology known to man.
This is what we are to fear?
Originally posted by mikesingh
Heck! More than 10% of this so-called super power lives in poverty! For example, have you seen the back alleys and ghettos of New York?? Shining examples of affluence? Tens of millions of people are hungry each night, including millions of children who are suffering disease and malnutrition. In New York City, one of the richest cities in the world, there are children who live below the poverty level, deprived of minimal conditions that offer some hope from a life of misery, deprivation and violence.
Dude, you seem to be nuts, living in a world of make believe!
That snapshot tally was 727,304 homeless people nationwide, meaning about one in 400 Americans were without a home, according to a USA TODAY survey of all 460 localities that reported results to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in June.
People from all walks of life are among the homeless. They are individuals and families, men and women, they are young children and elderly people. Forty to fifty percent of the homeless have high school diplomas and 24% are employed in either full-time or part-time work
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
Anyhow im not saying there isnt a problem in regards to poverty/homelessness in the US but it certainly isnt anything like the tripe that your trying to peddle to us.
According to figures released by the U.S. Census Bureau in September 1996, 13.8% of Americans live in poverty. Many more are on the borderline. Poverty affects all ages, but an astonishing 48% percent of its victims are children:
>About 15 million children -- one out of every four -- live below the official poverty line.
>22% of Americans under the age of 18 -- and 25% under age 12 -- are hungry or at the risk of being hungry.
>Everyday 2,660 children are born into poverty; 27 die because of it.
>Children and families are the fastest growing group in the homeless population, representing 40%.
Poverty in New York City
Domestic poverty knows no geographical barriers, but it is especially widespread here in New York City. The latest study, released in 1995 by the Citizens Committee for Children of New York, reveals that New York children fare worse in virtually every category than their counterparts at the state and national level. This includes low birth weight, infant mortality, violence-related deaths, abuse and neglect, education, and job preparedness.
Life for New York City children is getting worse:
25% of New Yorkers are children.
762,000 children live in poverty.
181 babies are born into poverty each day.
10,000 children are homeless. This number has doubled since 1988.
Many New York City children read and do math below grade level.
Among the 21 most affluent nations, the United States has the highest percentage of poor children. In fact, our rate is twice that of the country next in line.
Originally posted by mikesingh
And then what of Russia? A strategic triangle, which is already taking shape, consisting of India, Russia and China will make America look like one of the third world countries having little influence on world affairs.
Welcome to the New World Order!!
Originally posted by jsobecky
And the days of military superiority being determined by sheer numbers is a thing of the past.
Originally posted by jsobecky
And the days of military superiority being determined by sheer numbers is a thing of the past.
Originally posted by CAPT PROTON
HAH! I doubt it. Until China and India create some world changing technologies like the steam engine, the telegraph, telephone, and electric lights, etc., they won't be considered too threatening.
The other thing is, developed countries like the US and Japan for instance are moving toward more robotic automation for their factories. Ever heard of the "Lights Out" style of manufacturing? Its a factory environment that runs 24/7 with little to no people doing any of the actual work.
It would be very hard for chinese or Indian factories loaded with workers to keep up with a robotic factory in terms of quantity and most importantly quality. Now, there would be nothing to stop the chinese or indians from building their own robot factories, but then what about all those people out of work? Gee, that looks like a real huge problem taking care of billions of jobless folks.
Suddenly, there's a huge problem.
They better have a war or something with each other, so they can right size their populations, don't you think?
Sure America's growth rate is about 2%, but its real difficult to grow a $10 trillion a year economy.
[edit on 21-11-2006 by CAPT PROTON]
Originally posted by CAPT PROTON
HAH! I doubt it. Until China and India create some world changing technologies like the steam engine, the telegraph, telephone, and electric lights, etc., they won't be considered too threatening.