It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...it appears that several agencies are laboring to silence scientists who are researching climate trends and alterations, especially where they have knowledge about the degree to which human activities are playing a role in the rapid and historically inexplicable heating of the planet's surface and atmosphere.
The case in point is that of Dr. James Hansen, head of climatology research for NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. He essentially became a whistleblower when he broke an institutional silence and came forward to explain to the press the severe risks facing the world if action is not taken to tackle climate change now. ...Hansen appeared on CBS' 60 Minutes program and other national media. Scientists, academics and journalists formed a wave of support for Hansen and his right to speak openly and freely about public science, and NASA declared its intention to reform its media policy, saying it recognized the rights of individual employees to employ their First Amendment rights to freedom of expression.
But, as Tom Devine and Tarek Maassarani report, there is a lot of fine print to work out in the NASA reforms, and the result is, it may leave scientists and civil servants even more vulnerable to intimidation and to retaliation for speaking freely. The new media policy still places government scientists under harsh restrictions and still seems aimed to give superiors control over what the media hear and discuss, as related to agency work. This standard seems not only to work against the First Amendment, but its lean toward censorship also violates a number of other federal laws.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Hm, you know I seem to remember an ATSNN thread about this
awhile back
Originally posted by soficrow
Thank you so much for your thoughtful, informative and positive contributions.
...I doubt this is a 'departmental' game to get funding increases. There are far too many other examples of this administration silencing scientists and obstructing Open Access to scientific information.
And remember - we're talking about info from research funded by your tax dollars. Dontcha think you have a right to see what you paid for?
[edit on 13-11-2006 by soficrow]
Originally posted by iori_komei
I am opposed to the closing of these libraries, though I think that
they should just create big federal science databases, rather than
libraries for different branches.
Originally posted by Long Lance
Yes, it's apparent that these agencies do not need to follow the law, for the simple reason that no-one enforces them in their case.
Originally posted by soficrow
There are far too many other examples of this administration silencing scientists and obstructing Open Access to scientific information.
Originally posted by marg6043
Yes what was a good agency when it was formed and used to served the public, is becoming over run by private interest.
Originally posted by soficrow
I agree - databases are a good idea, BUT - on the downside, it is VERY easy to censor, rewrite and/or disappear electronic info.