It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by Harte
The Earth is not an entity, and thus cannot be said to "give us" anything at all.
Really? Hmmmm..
Earth
I guess it depends on what you want to believe.
His initial hypothesis was that the biomass modifies the conditions on the planet to make conditions on the planet more hospitable – the Gaia Hypothesis properly defined this "hospitality" as a full homeostasis...
...This theory is based on the simple idea that the biomass self-regulates the conditions on the planet to make its physical environment (in particular temperature and chemistry of the atmosphere) on the planet more hospitable to the species which constitute its "life". The Gaia Hypothesis proper defined this "hospitality" as a full homeostasis. A simple model that is often used to illustrate the original Gaia Hypothesis is the so-called Daisyworld simulation.
Originally posted by Harte
Of course if you want to believe something (as you said,) you can. Harte
Originally posted by Harte
The Earth is not an entity, and thus cannot be said to "give us" anything at all.
If the Earth was capable of this, then it would have already gotten rid of us and the rest of this fantastically thin shell of what basically amounts to slime that has started growing on, and infecting, it's surface.
Harte
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
I guess it depends on what you want to believe.
Originally posted by dave_54
gaia?? LOL!!!!!!! A trip down memory lane to a less enlightened time.