It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Masisoar
I'm not going to submit to your version of how the window issues weren't "Squibs".
Originally posted by Masisoar
What I like to pursue at heart, shared by BSBray11, and others.. is the "free-fall" velocity of World Trade Center 7 as it fell and how, even the video seems to reveal a "demolition look-a-like" from in which how it fell, experiencing, what appears to be, minimal to little resistance. This is the key factor in this, and how the vertical supports in WTC 7 all seemed to of been equally compromised (well.. relatively speaking) at the same time to allow for it fall in its foot-steps.
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
That figure is with resistance, remember it was taken from the video, so whatever the time and distance the buildings fell at was in the figures, so you don't need to re-factor it in...
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
That figure is with resistance, remember it was taken from the video, so whatever the time and distance the buildings fell at was in the figures, so you don't need to re-factor it in...
You're saying, it wasn't a demolition, therefore all of the resistance in the video is all of the resistance the building should have provided against it falling onto itself.
Originally posted by bsbray11
The building above falls straight down, accelerating near free-fall, because everything that would prevent this has been destroyed.
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
I guess that tells me your powers of observation...
The building you are showing doesn't fall straight down, it looks like it is tilting as it is falling...
The vid of WTC 7 has all the evidence you need, it did offer resistance to gravity...