It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by queenannie38
It would seem to me that the object in question must surely have to have been in the sight of at least one soul at one point in time - otherwise the object would have no representative correspondence upon the fabric of space/time.
Originally posted by Voidmaster
It can be pretty difficult trying to pick out your Subcon. voice among all that static thought that we create without trying.
Originally posted by Valhall
When I got my first job out of college I worked with a man who told me that he would have "spells" where he saw through some one else's eyes. He had no control over when it would happen, or how long it would last. But he claimed that he could just be sitting at his desk working, and all of a sudden his "view" would change to the view of another person, say the person in the next office, and that he would actually be seeing whatever they were seeing (I'm assuming he just presumed that to be true, but he may have actually verified it). Anyway, thought I'd share that. I know it's anecdotal, but that's what he said.
Originally posted by Voidmaster
..., but looking through another's eyes and hearing what they hear and all that, by Psionic means, is called Outbounding.
Originally posted by elaine
Try asking yourself the question about where something is before you go to sleep and sometimes you'll wake up just "knowing" the answer. Trick is to remember the dream long enough to get the answer you want.
Originally posted by yeht Anyway I wanted to open up the debate of you can remote view through a person but objects alone are useless without a person.
I have never experienced the later.