It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
. Just because the the elevators did not service every floor does not mean that the shafts stopped at each local elevator, nor does it mean that they weren't open to each other laterally.
Originally posted by bsbray11
If anything, you guys would have had it right the first time when you suggested it went straight down. Obviously it did not.
www.usatoday.com...
Elevator shafts worked like chimneys, funneling unbearable smoke to floors above the crashes. The shafts also channeled burning jet fuel throughout both towers. Fire moved not only up and down but also side to side, from shaft to shaft, unleashing explosions in elevator lobbies and in restrooms next to the shafts.
USA TODAY made an intensive effort over the past six months to determine what happened to the World Trade Center elevators. Reporters interviewed more than 50 people who were in elevators at the time the jets hit or moments before. The newspaper also reviewed 2,500 pages of accounts written by survivors and reports in other media outlets, examined architectural plans and spoke to elevator experts and mechanics who worked at the Trade Center.
Originally posted by bsbray11
First of all, if you're referring to CDI, then guess what? They were "in on it", at least in the uppermost levels. They were government-contracted, they came in, they did the clean-up and helped ship all the evidence out, get rid of it. They did the same thing with the Murrah Federal Building during OKC, and undetonated charges were found within that building!
Originally posted by doctorfungi
Typical mentality of a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. The very second someone comes up with credible evidence that debunks your theory...
"THEY'RE IN ON IT!!!"
Originally posted by bsbray11
What are you talking about, dude? They were referenced as a source of information. No actual information was even given!
One day when you play the incredulous card, no one's going to buy it, and you're going to have to try for something with some actual substance to it.
Originally posted by doctorfungi
What'd you expect? Them to do it themselves by hand?
So let's add to the amount of people who are "in on it" shall we?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Do you have a source Anok?
It seems the opposite was true, should we just take your word for it as well?
1) They do it all the time in plane crashes. Into fields, buildings, water, moon. So ya they should have done the same thing.
2) Nobody ever got a chance to study the metal at ground zero unless they had NIST or FEMA on their jackets.
3) There was never an independent investigation on why 9/11 happened. And if you bring up the 9/11 commission you need shot right between the damn eyes. It was a whitewash so people would stfu about 9/11. Fortunately for people like us we aren't shutting up They need a real Investigation PERIOD.
4) CDI is as Bunk as McVeigh bombing Murrah himself.
So why don't you go do some real research and come back to the table with something good to add to this conversation..
Ohh we can bring up a whole 9000 other things if we want..
But explosions at the bottom of the tower, it was stated on NEWS and elsewhere..
www.studyof911.com...
Have a nice day.
Originally posted by doctorfungi
Would someone care to explain to me what on earth an explosion 90 floors below impact would do to effect a top to bottom collapse other than risk exposure for the people who placed them?
The trade towers CLEARLY started collapsing at the top. There is NOTHING a bomb 90 floors below the impact point that went un-noticed by thousands of people would have done to help bring that building down.
Originally posted by doctorfungi
I have studied the summary of the report by FEMA, The American Society of Civil Engineers and several other professional engineering organizations. These experts have given in detail the effects on the Towers by the impact of the commercial aircraft. I have also read Professor Jones' (referred to) 42 page unpublished report. In my understanding of structural design and the properties of structural steel I find Professor Jones' thesis that planted explosives (rather than fire from the planes) caused the collapse of the Towers, very unreliable.
D. Allan Firmage
Structural Engineer - 57 years
57 years of structural engineering experience isn't a walk in the park. After 57 years of experience... you know your stuff.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Maybe you should have done a little more research before posting that giant essay based on the false premise of a single express elevator.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by bsbray11
If anything, you guys would have had it right the first time when you suggested it went straight down. Obviously it did not.
According to who? You?
Sorry if I don't take your word on it.
Actual journalists disagree with you, and until you provide evidence to the contrary go ahead and ignore what you don't want to hear, you seem to do it anyway.
www.usatoday.com...
Elevator shafts worked like chimneys, funneling unbearable smoke to floors above the crashes. The shafts also channeled burning jet fuel throughout both towers. Fire moved not only up and down but also side to side, from shaft to shaft, unleashing explosions in elevator lobbies and in restrooms next to the shafts.
Enclosures for vertical shafts, including stairways and transfer corridors, elevator hoistways, and mechanical or utility shafts were required to be 2 h [that's 2 hours] fire rated construction. Protection of vertical shafts is intended to limit the spread of fire and smoke from floor to floor.
Originally posted by Valhall
This point is actually quite important to this debate. It's important enough that we ought to take the time to list every elevator that:
1. Had people on it at the time of the impact who survived because they didn't get shot like a bullet through the bottom of the building.
2. Were used in any floor below the impact during the post-impact evacuation.
3. Had "burning rivulets of fire" witnessed (because you can't have an FAE and "burning jet fuel" at the same time.
Originally posted by Valhall
I can't believe you're seriously asking us to accept journalists as experts on this matter.
www.usatoday.com...
USA TODAY made an intensive effort over the past six months to determine what happened to the World Trade Center elevators. Reporters interviewed more than 50 people who were in elevators at the time the jets hit or moments before. The newspaper also reviewed 2,500 pages of accounts written by survivors and reports in other media outlets, examined architectural plans and spoke to elevator experts and mechanics who worked at the Trade Center.
Please keep in mind that not a single elevator was reported to have been slammed to the bottom of its shaft.
Most deaths occurred in the express elevators in both towers that went from the lobbies to the 78th floors and in the elevators near the top floors of the buildings. Sixty-four of the twin towers' 198 elevators had cables that ran through the floors devastated by the hijacked hijacked planes, and the cables were likely destroyed.
Forty-eight of these 64 elevators had no known survivors. Even in the elevators where people escaped — mostly because the doors happened to be open at the moment of impact — they left behind a large number of people who were burned to death or were killed when the buildings collapsed.
The loss of life was almost complete inside the south tower's 10 giant express elevators, which were shuttling evacuees from the 78th floor to the ground floor after the north tower was hit. Only four people survived.
The four survivors — two each from adjacent elevators — were in elevators that plunged and were stopped by the emergency brakes 6 to 10 feet above the lobby floor. About 40 people died in those two elevators. Doomed passengers called loved ones from two other south tower express elevators stuck near the 12th floor in one case and the 19th floor in another.
The express elevators in the north tower had eight survivors in two elevators. In the other eight express elevators, nobody is known to have lived.
Originally posted by Griff
There were other express elevators that only went to the ground floor. There was only ONE express elevator that went BELOW the ground floor. Got it yet?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Let's put forth some alternate theories and see if they stand up better or worse than what I am putting forth.
If you have nothing other than, "I Believe there were bombs, so I'm right" then excuse me for being skeptical.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by Valhall
I can't believe you're seriously asking us to accept journalists as experts on this matter.
Right, so I'm supposed to believe you because?
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by Valhall
I can't believe you're seriously asking us to accept journalists as experts on this matter.
Right, so I'm supposed to believe you because?
Because the information I provided came straight out of the final NIST report. They aren't my words, they're NIST's words.
The local elevators in a zone were stacked one on top the other for that zone. But the shaft terminated and was given over to office space at the lowest floor of each zone. The building was in three vertical zones. Only local elevators in the respective zones were stacked. Elevators were not stacked from one zone to the next. It's in the NIST report. I gave the link.