Ian Huntley Framed: USAF servicemen paedo's

golddragnet what you have learned is extremely dangerous. I would be very careful about what questions you answer that might give away your I.D. I would also suggest you get the appropriate I.P address, plus other hiding software.

Ian Huntley was just a cleaner, and yeah is innocent.
However was he killed by someone working at the base? Who then dumps the bodies outside the base? (Quite unlikely, unless they’re completely mad, and as a genuine lunatic would be even more unlikely to qualify for state protection)
Or does this location simply derail conspiracyists away from a darker secret?
You said secret paedophile ring, maybe. Or maybe black magic ring?

Obviously a death caused by a serviceman at a U.S base wouldn’t do the bases PR reputation any favours. But I doubt it wouldn’t come anywhere near to causing it to be closed. Therefore what happened with this U.S serviceman is as irrelevant as the bodies location.
What’s important is that a dark group has caused the police, mass media, and justice system to frame a perfectly innocent man, in order to protect a guilty group. The mass media would have cooperated on the understanding the cause was on national security grounds (though this is of course a lie).

Perhaps questions should also be asked about the five prostitutes murdered up north, and the fork lift driver they claim did it?
Or maybe not? Personally I would forget about it; know what you know but surely you can see that in (in this case) Resistance is Futile? You’re not a world changer.

I have heard from a former inmate or patient at Rampton that the authorities there do administer very high doses of drugs to the patients constantly, and he is sure that the doctors there use the patients for experiments with different drugs. He described his time there, drugged constantly against his will, being out of it all day, and totally at the mercy of the authorities. He couldn't remember alot, other than being drugged all the time, he saw the faces of other patients, looking totally vacant and drooling mouths open, and he said that he was aware that he must have looked the very same himself. He told of one occasion when the medics brought out a huge needle, enormous one, he was already weak from being drugged and motionless for long periods, the medics told him they wanted to test his brain, the huge needle was pushed into his face and he could feel it going up behind his eyeball and into his brain before they released the conconction and he passed out. He was very lucky to get out of there. Patients can be held there even if they aren't criminals, all the authorities have to do is hold them under the Mental Health act. He said that Huntley would definintely have been drugged constantly and probably deprived of daylight, it would have been easy for the authorities to attempt to brainwash him through hypnosis and the drugs.

When Huntley appeared in court his appearance was remarked on by the press and it was obvious he had been treated with neuroleptic drugs at Rampton.

I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread, but if you are...

I was in Soham when this happened. I went to the trial.

I have no doubt that Huntley killed those two girls.

Those who quoted the late Mr Vialls theories need to realise they have holes big enough to drive a red Ford Fiesta through.

Huntley was guilty, get over it.

But if you want to debate it some more, let me know.

49 fibres from the man u shirts of the girls were found in his house and his finger prints on the black bag in the hangar where he tried to burn their clothes..

s

Forgive me if someone has already mentioned this but wasn't there evidence concerning the CCTV cameras which picked the two girls up on their way home right up to the point they reach Huntleys home yet none of the cameras pick them up after that point! Clear evidence that they went missing near Huntley home!
As far as I'm concerned Huntley is guilty.
As for him being brain damaged! Haven't heard that before but from what I've read in the newspapers he now shares his cell with his lboyfriend . . .

I cannot believe i am reading this! I was only told the nearly the EXACT same story by a friend
who was told it by a US serviceman in a bar while my friend was on holiday.

I found it to hard to believe and was not going to post on it but then my friend said
it was common knowledge that it was indeed a US serviceman who had committed
the murders and he had done it before in soul in Korea a young girl killed so they said.
Apparently this too was hushed up and the man was moved to England.

There are so many holes in the official story as to make this a possibility.

If this was found to be true imagine the outrage it would of coursed and they could not
do with our close ties with the US being broken because of what happened.

I really do not know what to believe but why would US servicemen come out with such a story?
Then i look just out of curiosity and here it is! a thread on what i heard. can this be true?

Well it certainly could be possible OP, considering the players
One third of the women in the uS army claim to have been raped by their compatriots

“Almost a third of all women serving are raped, and over two thirds sexually assaulted, this problem is rampant and systemic,” National Public Radio has reported.
“Everybody’s supposed to have a battle buddy in the army, and females are supposed to have one to go to the latrines with, or to the showers – that’s so you don’t get raped by one of the men on your own side. But because I was the only female there, I didn’t have a battle buddy. My battle buddy was my gun and my knife,” Army specialist Chantelle Henneberry said."

republicbroadcasting.org...

There were a high number[1] of alleged rapes of Japanese civilians committed by Allied soldiers during the last months of the Pacific War and the subsequent Occupation of Japan. Okinawan historian Oshiro Masayasu claims that there were as many as 10,000 rapes of Okinawan women by American troops during the three month Battle of Okinawa.[2]

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Danbones


Shocking. I only heard about this "theory" the other day and i was NOT going to start a thread
on it but i was shocked to find one!
I just find it hard for someone to make up such an allegation.

As far as the official story went i fell for it hook line and sinker. I hated Huntley and believed
he was guilty. but this opens up a whole can of worms.
I wish i had not been told it really. This is dangerous information.

reply to post by golddragnet


I remember the Soham Murder Trial and I have to say that at the time I did not believe Huntley had been the brains behind the deaths of these two girls.

I remember seeing him at the trial a long time after the murder. I always wondered why he had been sent to a psychiatric hospital and kept there so long when at no time did the authorities say he was mentally disturbed enough to kill.

I also remember reading in a newspaper that the security services had insisted that the murderer of the girls was back in Soham and there was no need to pursue the matter further at the base. I always found that to be a very odd thing to say, do, or write about in the media. After that the media continued to push that Huntley was the murderer and I never ever believed the official story.

He may have had some part in the whole business but I don't think he was the ring leader.

I have always suspected that perhaps there is a big child sex abuse ring with many people in high places involved but have never had any evidence, and besides I don't think any case would stick if the authorities didn't want the person smeared and removed from doing any damage to their corrupt endeavours.

I do remember later reading Joe Vialls account on the internet and found he stated very well what I had been suspecting. I was not surprised to read later that he had died.

There have been several instances of sexual abuse to girls and young women in the Cambridgeshire/Norfolk area since then, and whilst no-one has linked them with the Soham case I personally am of the opinion (although I can't prove anything beyond the circumstantial) that there is something going on like this, and that the bases are somehow connected. Much was made of the fact they were British bases, but in reality they have been given to the US and the personnel their have total control, treating the bases as if they were on American soil.

Suddenly I thought about the whole issue today, many years later, and decided to look on the net for further information. I found this site. I am now responding in what I hope is an appropriate way. All the views I express here are my own; I came to them independently.

For those who find the whole thing hard to believe, that there could be a paedophile ring involving American Military Personnel, I would say that I have been reading a book written in 1960 by Dennis Wheatley called the Satanist. It has many views expressed, mainly fictionally presented, however I believe there were similar things going on at that time which he was aware of. Remember, he was an influential person during WWII, he had many influential people within whom he was in contact, and he also knew a lot about Satanist activities. Although I don't think he was an active occultist I think he knew many who were.

As I read this book I am surprised at how so many concepts expressed within it are happening today. I suggest you find a copy of this book - if you can - and read it. You may be surprised at what it contains, and how accurate it is regarding today's situation. Or pehaps not. It is up to you to decide.

What better place to take victims to, to rape, torture and murder, perhaps even make movies of it, than a military base. They are completely out of bounds to EVERYONE.
Gotta be an idea for a movie there somewhere.

I don't believe this, sorry but it seems too much of a reach. Especially considering Maxine Carr's involvement and this,
from Wiki
"On 5 September 2006, Huntley attempted to kill himself by taking an overdose of antidepressants he had accumulated in his prison cell.[219] This resulted in his hospitalisation and a thorough search of his cell, in which a cassette tape was recovered. This cassette tape contains a very different account of the murders of Wells and Chapman than that to which Huntley had testified at his trial. In what Huntley had believed would be his posthumous confession, he claims to have confessed to having murdered both girls to Carr prior to their arrest and his plans to confess to authorities, to which, Huntley alleged, Carr had slapped his face and informed him to "pull [himself] together" as she did not wish to lose the teaching position she had yearned for all her life. Huntley further alleges Carr had encouraged him to burn both bodies in an attempt to destroy all forensic evidence linking him to the crime.[220] It is believed Huntley had agreed to make this recording for a fellow prisoner (who had hoped to later sell the confession to the media after his release), in return for being provided with the antidepressants he had used to attempt suicide."