Originally posted by xmotex
1) Hezbollah was founded in Lebanon, with the express purpose of repelling the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. While they have been known to operate
outside of Lebanon, the vast majority of their infrastructure and operations are based there, and the vast majority of their members are Lebanese. How
is it "baseless" that they're a Lebanese organization?!?
Addressig all of 1).....
Expressed purpose…no...infrastucture...no. c'mon
Hezbollah was not formed specifically to resist Israeli occupation and the formation and organization’s involvement in Lebanon is larger than just
Israel...this is more than a historical fact. The 'press' loves to mention your idea...without accountability.
The self stated position of the organization is that Hezbollah exists as an “umma”,
not a defender of a Lebanon but of an ‘ideal’. If
one takes the time to read their manifesto, it is clear what the main goals are:
The complete destruction of Israel, establishing a Shi’ite theocracy in Lebanon under similar Iranian structure and the elimination of all Western
influences in the ME. This is proclaimed by the organization!
“to create an Islamic
nation over the ashes of the State of Israeli---1997
Furthermore (very, very briefly),
Hezbollah’s initial primary function was engaging the
Amal militia (
please take the time to understand the history here) from
conception (not Israel). Not until
Iran chose to direct the organization completely was ‘resistance’ against Israelis an issue.
Hezbollah primarily continued to only combat the Amal until Syria intervened and ended the civil war. It was Syria that disarmed all militias with the
exception of Hezbollah, not Lebanon.
Hezbollah was to directed (by Teheran and Damascus) to remain in the southern regions in a favorable position which could be used to offer resistance
against Israel, but all military plans, at this time, had to go through Damascus.
Not until 1991, when
Iran choose to replace Sobhi Tufaili with Musawi (as Secretary General of Hezbollah) and after Musawi’s death in 1992
(caused by Israeli action) did Hezbollah begin targeted/organized attacks on Israeli forces.. Narsallah was then appointed by Ayatollah Khamenei.
Iran also responded to the attack against Musawi by blowing-up the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires (which Khamenei is going through indictment
by Brazil this very week for this act).
Iran began fixing the 'MO' for Hezbollah at this time.
Btween 1985 and 1987 major events between the two factions occurred, when Hez defeated by margin (600+) of the Amal in a full press, Hezbollah assumed
their role...but nothing more....yet.
The leadership of Hez is appointed and controlled historically and presently by Syria and predominantly by Iran. These states created and support
syndicates. The leadership has not constantly enjoyed a Lebanese majority and while there may be currently a Lebanese born SG, he answers
not
to the Lebanese people or government. Simply, review the comments from Iran’s Supreme leader during this past summer’s conflict.
A number of other armed militant organizations stem from the territory of Lebanon and may use Lebanese recruits (some examples):….
…Force 17, Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA), Japanese Red Army, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine Special
Command (as well as the GC and LP), Abu Nadal Organization (ANO), Asbat al-Ansar and the PIJ….
Are all of the above “Lebanese militias?”...or Lebanese?....NO.
Originally posted by xmotex
2) Nasrallah has essentially said that Hezbollah defers to the Palestinians on the issue of Israel, IE if the Palestinians can come to an agreement
with Israel, Hezbollah has no right to intervene and the "necessity of the destruction of Israel" is a moot point.
The enemy of my enemy etc…Palestine is a platform for their goals (as well as may other states) as long as conflict exists between the two, on this
I’ll agree…but Hezbollah helps to foster and support the conflict...yes?
The destruction is Israel is an announced public point Hezbollah intentionally put in writing…to you it may be moot by opinion…but clearly not to
Hezbollah.
Originally posted by xmotex
Hezbollah are by no means an innocent party, but the pretense that the Israelis are "innocent victims" of Hezbollah is absurd, and little more than
transparent propaganda.
Guilt or innocence is a point I never addressed.
But this common misconception Hezbollah formed to “resist Israel” is fallacious and historically inaccurate. Hezbollah is and has always been
nothing more than proxy militia, formed, supported, lead and overseen by “other than Lebanese”. Everything Hezbollah has done so far is
consistent with its goals.
mg