It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Hey there selfless, I want you to know I understand your confusion on this issue. I used to be semi-professional 3d CG artist, I have done commercials and used lightwave 3D the same program used to make a lot of science fiction TV shows and movies. It is great for doing outer space planet scenes. I think what the problem is that what you are seeing is the post processing NASA has to do to make these pictures so nice and crisp. A detailed picture needs a certain amount of light. When shots are taken that far out beyond the sun, and a picture of such scope (capturing a gas giant) it is bound to look like it has been CG. It doesn’t mean it has, remember if a picture can be made on a computer with the kind of detail modern software and hardware has provided, editing a real picture is child’s play.
My point is there is not a reason for them to fake the entire shot. They can just edit the shots that have been taken. I hope this helps.
Regards, LGM
Originally posted by selfless
Do you have the pic that they took before they edited it to to be more crisp? i rather see it for real then seeing itt edited.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Selfless if I remember correctly...John Lear is the one who started talking about how NASA really covers up everything and that Saturn is not a gas giant and has an atmosphere and every picture from NASA is doctored up. Maybe you are taking what John Lear is saying a bit too seriously, considering he himself does not have personal experience with these things and gets most of his info from stories.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Originally posted by selfless
Do you have the pic that they took before they edited it to to be more crisp? i rather see it for real then seeing itt edited.
No my friend I do not, but I do know what you mean, it does look like something I have personally done in Lightwave! I can empathize with you completely. I don’t know why so many people were so hostile to you because it does look CG, this is from an old pro.
Regards, LGM
Originally posted by Edn
Like most people are saying, go look for yourself because its obvious your never going to accept anything else otherwise unless you see the planet for yourself.
Originally posted by selfless
Im just saying that the close up pics of saturn looks like computer generated images and the pics im talking about are still far enough to get a full picture of saturn.
well i want the real deal and i don't care if it's not as crisp as the computer generated ones.
Here is the picture of Saturn taken by the Hubble telescope in ultraviolet light. The glowing, swirling material at Saturn's poles is its auroral "curtains," rising more than a thousand miles above the cloud tops. Saturn's auroral displays are caused by an energetic wind from the Sun that sweeps over the planet, much like Earth's aurora, which is occasionally seen in the nighttime sky. The process that triggers these auroras is similar to the phenomenon that causes fluorescent lamps to glow. Credits: J.T. Trauger (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) and NASA.
Originally posted by Apass
Selfless.... I still didn't get an answer at my question. Well...in fact many of us asked you the same thing. Why do you think those images are not the real thing, that they are computer generated?
Can you give us some objective reasons?
Edited to add:
Damn, Rasobasi420...I told you not give away that picture!!!!!
[edit on 23/10/06 by Apass]
Originally posted by selfless
Why would i waste my time answering something to someone who redicules me?
Right, i wouldn't.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Originally posted by selfless
Why would i waste my time answering something to someone who redicules me?
Right, i wouldn't.
Because if you don't, more people may ridicule you. That may not be the 'right thing to do' but hey, here we are.