It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.asiamedia.ucla.edu...
China is acting in bad faith on the Korean nuclear issue. That’s the provocative suggestion now coming from some Western intelligence circles. It’s a scary, foul and ultimately upsetting thought. It may also be wrong.
Originally posted by LooseLipsSinkShips
I agree 100% and we all know Russian and China are cooking up something as we speak...
Originally posted by maestro46
Originally posted by LooseLipsSinkShips
I agree 100% and we all know Russian and China are cooking up something as we speak...
Oh and deessell, why does SK want US troops out? Is your opinion biased by any chance? Just curios cause that is the first time I ever heard that, so please explain my the issues if you can.
PS: K4rupt, your quote - "It's not the voting thats democracy, it's the counting." is not by Tom Stoppard, it was origionally said by Joseph Stalin if memory serves; "In democracy it's not the people that vote that count, but the people who count the votes". Ironicaly he was right, just look at Bush.
Very interesting. Can you fill my in a bit more on this though. Aren't the US bases there for peace keeping purposes? Is it just the way you feel, I mean about saying that SK is not an independant country or are it's decisions in any way influenced (if so then how much) by the US or does the US do what it want's there? Last but not least, don't you think that if the US withdraws its forces SK will be able to withstand a NK invasion? I myself know little to nothing about SK military, and I only assume they recieve and use US military tech and equipment (and some Russian I think) and also get training from US.
The United States is equipping its forces for high tech expeditionary warfare, in part as a hedge against the uncertainties posed by China's military buildup, a Pentagon spokesman Thursday.
The change in tone began last June when US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned at a international security conference in Singapore that China was spending much more on its military than officially acknowledged.
Could this be the real clash of civilizations? For half a decade, the U.S. government has been preoccupied with Islamic fundamentalism. That threat is real. But even as the U.S. military continues to battle radicals in Iraq and Afghanistan, Washington and Beijing seem to be engaged in a quiet but comprehensive war of wills—over trade policy, human rights, globalization and other issues—that could greatly affect what sort of governance systems emerge in the developing world. While car bombings grab the headlines, it's at least arguable that long-term, mild-mannered Chinese leaders like Hu Jintao pose a greater challenge to America's vision for the wider world.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
I would strongly suggest that the decision makers in this country open their eyes.
On Friday, the Pentagon released a strategic blueprint indicating that China was a major focus for U.S. military planners. "Of the major and emerging powers, China has the greatest potential to compete militarily with the United States," the 92-page Quadrennial Defense Review stated.
Originally posted by LooseLipsSinkShips
I agree 100% and we all know Russian and China are cooking up something as we speak...