UFO pics which cant be explained

I started a thread last year with these pics since no could explain what they were i decided to post them up again hoping any new members or any one else could explain what they are.These photos are the best in my collection since i saw them flying i really would like to close the case on the photos any help would be great
Cyrax

these pics were taken today in sydney australia
camera used was a kodak z7590
these pics were taken at 4:30pm it lasted a few minutes
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
at 5:00pm this craft? was seen it lasted a few mins trail never got bigger
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
i54.photobucket.com...
well any ideas
most people on the other thread though it could be
1.space junk reentering our atmosphere(does space junk fly like a craft)
2.Discovery shuttle(very unlikely)
i believe i caught a secret military craft or a ufo though i think it was a craft from here.

It looks interesting to me.

Hopefully the members here can check it out and give us an honest opinion.

It DOESN'T look like swamp gas, meteor, balloon, or a kite to me.

The first few pictures are weird. The last 3 are just jet contrails.

I agree with contrail it isn't chemtrail, but I would say it's not a jet contrail but a UFO contrail. Whatever it is I think we can say for right now it is unidentified.

the object leaving the trail when i was taking the pics it looked like it was not moving as you can see the trail never got bigger nor did it disappear like normal contrails, the first object was moving like a plane it stayed on the same path untill i lost it behind clouds when i was watching the object there was not detail to it ,it was just metalic then 30min later i saw the second object
do you think its the same object?

Not all contrails are long. The lenght of a trail depends on the atmospheric conditions - basicly humidity (water vapor partial pressure), dust (condesation nuclei) and temperature. If the high atmosphere is poor in water vapor then the contrail will soon disipate through sublimation or evaporation. In fact, like my physics teacher said, if the contrail is short or absent than the weather will be fine (no rain since there isn't much water vapor). About the object movement...you can't just tell that from and only from your pictures. (ie, what is the time difference between them, what zoom did you used?).
If it was a high altitude jet, then you would percieve it moving verry slowly.
There is a possibility for the object to be the same in all the pictures. It is possible for a jet not to leave contrails.
To further analyse this it will be good if you could provide the original pictures.

edited for some spelling

[edit on 3/10/06 by Apass]

I don't know but I will say it is interesting. I hope you get more responses on this. Many on this site are excellent with looking into possibilities.

I think we really do need honest opinions on this and not the same old , it a balloon.

the pics are the originals
the first set of pics were taken at 4:30pm the sec sets was taken at 5:00
the zoom was set in about half i dont think this was a normal jet as you can see in the first set of pics its dont not look like a normal jet

Not all of them are original. I noticed some of them are zoomed in and cropped and some of them appear also zoomed in but without the cropping.
The zoom was set in about a half...of what? (3x, 6x, 12x,...zoom camera) What kind of zoom? (optical / digital). Are there 2 frames taken with the same zoom?

edit:
Oh..I just noted this

I started a thread last year with these pics since no could explain what they were i decided to post them up again hoping any new members or any one else could explain what they are.These photos are the best in my collection since i saw them flying i really would like to close the case on the photos any help would be great

And the pictures are dated july, 2006

[edit on 3/10/06 by Apass]

First set is a light distortion of the North Star or Venus with your camera.

The second set is contrails made to look more grand with the setting sun.

Originally posted by PisTonZOR
The first few pictures are weird. The last 3 are just jet contrails.

how often do you see a jet flying towards the earth in that manner..

When swamp gas rises to quickly between power lines, it creates ball lightning that appears to be more distant that it actually is.

Originally posted by Beyonddeath

Originally posted by PisTonZOR
The first few pictures are weird. The last 3 are just jet contrails.

how often do you see a jet flying towards the earth in that manner..

I think it's a perspective issue: Given the curvature of the earth, the optical illusion makes the plane look like it's "plummeting" to the earth. In actuality, the plane is flying away from the photographer...

Originally posted by Beyonddeath
how often do you see a jet flying towards the earth in that manner..

It's an illusion. This is because you lose any depth information when take the picture (it is only 2D). The jet flys toward or away from the camera.

super70, swamp gas rises to quickly between power lines?

Originally posted by behindthescenes
First set is a light distortion of the North Star or Venus with your camera.

The second set is contrails made to look more grand with the setting sun.

a star that moves come on

Guys look at the pictures again - carefully - objectively. This guys takes pictures of condensation on his camera lens. It is absolutley and once you look again, obviously condensation.
Vance

swamp gas
theres no way these pics are swamp gas
as for the photos were taken earlier this year sorry but it feels like like it was a year ago
as for the zoom i does not have 3x 6x etc.. its W thats normal in the middle T and the top D

Those arent vessals their artifical worm holes.

Just my theory

Originally posted by vance
Guys look at the pictures again - carefully - objectively. This guys takes pictures of condensation on his camera lens. It is absolutley and once you look again, obviously condensation.
Vance

please with replys like that it proves you dont no what youre talking about
so i guess i have condensation on my eyes too
if you dont want to help me figure out what this is please dont reply


[edit on 3-10-2006 by CYRAX]

CYRAX, I think I mentioned this before, my sighting in Melbourne.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

or directly to image

img393.imageshack.us...

Very similar objects, had some member provide valid explainations too.

We have similar cameras too.

Hope this helps.