It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bertie Ahern, the Irish Prime Minister, today faces questioning in Parliament after he admitted accepting interest-free personal loans totalling £33,600 (€49,500) while Finance Minister in the 1990s.
The Taoiseach said that eight friends had banded together to lend him £15,100 (€22,500) in December 1993, when he was separating from his wife Miriam, and four friends gave him a further £18,500 (€26,500) in 1994. The loans have never been repaid and he has never paid interest on them, he confirmed.
Mr Ahern made the admissions last night in a candid and emotional television interview on the Six One programme on RTE, an Irish broadcaster. Gerry Brennan, his solicitor, had approached the group for help without his knowledge, he said.
Taoiseach Bertie Ahern will face a Dáil onslaught today from the Opposition, after he acknowledged last night that he has not repaid any of a €50,000 loan given to him by businessmen in 1993 and 1994.
The money from the 12-strong group, who he described as long-time friends, was used to pay costs surrounding his marital separation, including legal bills.
While the Tánaiste and Progressive Democrats leader Michael McDowell stayed silent following the Taoiseach's 20-minute interview, the Opposition said Mr Ahern must now clarify that all tax has been paid.
They said he must explain his declaration that he had appointed some of the group to State boards "because they were friends". At least four of the group, including Des Richardson, David McKenna, Jim Nugent and Joe Burke, have served on State boards.
A spokesman for the Tánaiste said he was "making no comment on the matter tonight".
Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny said Mr Ahern should not have accepted the money in the first place, given that he was then minister for finance. He said the situation is now "very grave" and Mr Ahern now had serious questions to answer with respect to tax issues and ethics legislation.
Taoiseach Bertie Ahern will face a Dáil onslaught today from the Opposition, after he acknowledged last night that he has not repaid any of a €50,000 loan given to him by businessmen in 1993 and 1994.
DUBLIN (Reuters) - Pressure mounted on Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern on Friday to explain a fee he received 12 years ago as finance minister that has sparked a political furore some commentators believe could topple his government.
Ahern, already under fire over a 50,000-euro (34,000 pound) loan from a group of friends in late 1993 which he has not repaid, insisted on Thursday he had broken no rules in accepting 8,000 pounds for speaking at a dinner in Manchester in 1994.
Irish premier since 1997 and facing a general election in the next nine months, Ahern mentioned the payment in a televised interview this week to discuss money he received from friends 13 years ago to help with legal costs of his marital separation.
The Progressive Democrats, junior coalition partner in government with Ahern's Fianna Fail party, initially defended his actions in accepting the loans but later questioned the speaking fee in comments the Irish Independent newspaper said "effectively put a gun" to Ahern's head.
"I have to say that there are very significant matters of concern which are not completely put at rest by the facts now in the public domain," newly appointed Progressive Democrats leader and deputy prime minister Michael McDowell said.
Tánaiste and leader of the Progressive Democrats Michael McDowell has called on Taoiseach Bertie Ahern to make a full public statement about his finances.
At a news conference this morning he confirmed that the PDs would not be withdrawing from Government, despite widespread media speculation to the contrary.
In a statement, Mr McDowell said he believed information given by the Taoiseach on his personal finances had been anything but complete.
He said it is now appropriate that a full statement be made by Mr Ahern and he said that the information given by the Taoiseach last autumn was very different from the information now available from other sources.