It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by observe50
I have much respect for Mr. Lear and it does surprise me at the way some here just don't seem to understand that when dealing with this subject we are talking about a different reality.
You need to really open your minds. What is realistic for humans isn't the way it is in the universe.
The camera was pointing toward TETHYS at approximately 509,689 kilometers away, and the image was taken using the CL1 and CL2 filters. This image has not been validated or calibrated. A validated/calibrated image will be archived with the NASA Planetary Data System in 2007.
Originally posted by SearchEngine
Back on subject here..
I found these links to some NASA photos of strange objects near Saturn:
Bright Object Up Close
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Bright object farther away
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Strange Object
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by SearchEngine
Back on subject here..
I found these links to some NASA photos of strange objects near Saturn:
Bright Object Up Close
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Bright object farther away
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Strange Object
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
This isn't so much a question TO Mr. Lear, more to you ABOUT Mr. Lear..
I mean, this forum is ALL about PROOF PROOF PROOF, but when someone that has nearly been DEIFIED by the majority of this community comes in and tells us that EVERYTHING we have ever been told about Space, the Solar System, and our own Planet is erronious, you eat it up like it is the biggest news of all time!
Think about this for a moment.
Originally posted by tomra
Obviously you missed a beat somewere, this forum is most certainly NOT ONLY about PROOF PROOF PROOF. Ideas and getting bold thoughts on the table most certainly is a major player within these realms.
Concerning proof, there´s plentyfull of blurry images featuring dots, spots, dust, lensflare, pixelation and every other thinkable possible image anomaly there is, and so far it has pretty much gotten us nowhere. Documents, sure plentyfull of those too, video...yupp, by the tons, witnesses, sure, how many do you want? Still the comunity screams for proof!
Someone mentioned earlier in another thread that many people would not feel convinced even if a UFO landed in their backyard and knocked on their door. Sceptisism is good but like everything else only to a certain point, it CAN make you go blind for the truth too...
Personally i think proof happens on a one to one basis and it won´t come in form of a pixelated blurry images, we need to look elsewhere. All said IMHO of course...
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
This isn't so much a question TO Mr. Lear, more to you ABOUT Mr. Lear..
There is no denying Mr. Lear's service and accomplishments, however.. ..how far does someone get to go without evidence of EXTRADORDINARY CLAIMS before they can be looked at skeptically?
I mean, this forum is ALL about PROOF PROOF PROOF, but when someone that has nearly been DEIFIED by the majority of this community comes in and tells us that EVERYTHING we have ever been told about Space, the Solar System, and our own Planet is erronious, you eat it up like it is the biggest news of all time!
Think about this for a moment.
Everything you think you know is wrong. Not some, not a few of the more undesirable bits, but -EVERYTHING-. The Earth is hollow and there are/were beings living inside of it. Our Moon was put in its orbit by aliens and they fly in ships that are tens of thousands of miles in length! There are people living on Venus, Mars, and Saturn, and I think the Moon as well. Oh yeah, and the moon is being mined.
HELLO???
Some of you that are putting so much FAITH in Mr. Lear's stories are the same people that find it so hard to believe Christianity's Bible.
It is one thing to step outside the box and another to burn down the box and never look back. I think that it is unhealthy and foolish to believe too hard in this without proper evidence.
Please tell me I am missing the joke here, because in your quest to deny ignorance, it would seem that some of us are denying sanity.
Without proof this story is nothing more than John Titor: Space Traveller from Saturn.
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between posting ideas and getting bold thoughts out there and making sworn declarations about life on other planets and telling everyone that there IS life on Saturn and that we arent psychologically equiped to phathom it's beauty.
So I am wrong to be skeptical of someone that is challenging EVERYTHING without solid tangible evidence?
There is no doubt in my mind that if this secret was being kept a secret for a reason, Mr. Lear would be dead before he could disclose anything more. The information that is presented would destroy religous AND modern scientific trust and a whistle-blower like Lear would be removed from the scene long before he was a threat to the secret.
Originally posted by johnlear
...if you saw a real picture of Saturn you would not be able to function as a normal walking, talking human being for about a day while you tried to assimilate what you saw.)
Originally posted by johnlear
Yes, Saturn still looks like Saturn through a telescope but you should know that it is a great deal further out in space than the moon.
Hank, if you don´t mind me asking, or anyone else for that matter, what is your idea of "tangible evidence"?
Originally posted by ferretman2
John Lear = John Titor?
Originally posted by jra
You have voted HankMcCoy for the Way Above Top Secret award.
Originally posted by johnlear
...if you saw a real picture of Saturn you would not be able to function as a normal walking, talking human being for about a day while you tried to assimilate what you saw.)
Originally posted by johnlear
Yes, Saturn still looks like Saturn through a telescope but you should know that it is a great deal further out in space than the moon.
Ok so looking at a "real picture of Saturn" would blow my mind, but looking at Saturn for real through a telescope, it still looks like the Saturn we know... riiiight... Care to elaborate? Because I must be missing something.
Originally posted by TheAnt
Can you see past the gases? If you can, then you can talk all you want that he's wrong. But seeing how you can't, you really don't know whats past the gases and clouds and therefore your point is invalid.
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by TheAnt
Can you see past the gases? If you can, then you can talk all you want that he's wrong. But seeing how you can't, you really don't know whats past the gases and clouds and therefore your point is invalid.
What point is invalid? I was asking a question as to why a "real" photo of Saturn supposedly looks so different from what we know, but looking at the real thing through a telescope, it looks just like the Saturn we know. John never said anything about a photo taken on Saturn under the clouds and gasses, he said a "picture of Saturn". I take this to mean of the planet itself. Thus, why I asked him to elaborate.